Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) is a technique to quantify tissue perfusion based on phase-specific enhancement after the injection of microbubble contrast agents for diagnostic ultrasound. The guidelines of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) published in 2004 and updated in 2008, 2011, and 2020 focused on the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), including essential technical requirements, training, investigational procedures and steps, guidance regarding image interpretation, established and recommended clinical indications, and safety considerations. However, the quantification of phase-specific enhancement patterns acquired with ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) is not discussed here. The purpose of this EFSUMB Technical Review is to further establish a basis for the standardization of DCE-US focusing on treatment monitoring in oncology. It provides some recommendations and descriptions as to how to quantify dynamic ultrasound contrast enhancement, and technical explanations for the analysis of time-intensity curves (TICs). This update of the 2012 EFSUMB introduction to DCE-US includes clinical aspects for data collection, analysis, and interpretation that have emerged from recent studies. The current study not only aims to support future work in this research field but also to facilitate a transition to clinical routine use of DCE-US.

Several different platforms providing ultrasound elastography have emerged in recent years. In this in vitro study on a single tissue-mimicking phantom (CIRS Model 49), we aimed to compare the performance of quantitative elastography measurements from platforms running strain elastography and others running shear wave elastography. We evaluated five different elastography platforms using both linear and curvilinear probes. All measurements were performed in parallel by two independent investigators who recorded the elasticity quantitatively. We investigated intra- and inter-observer agreement by intra-class correlation analysis and coefficient of variation, by correlation and limits of agreement. The reproducibility of elasticity measurements was good to excellent for shear wave and strain elastography. All five elastography platforms had high intra-observer (intra-class correlation coefficient: 0.932-1.0) and inter-observer correlation (intra-class correlation coefficient: 0.845-0.996). All inclusions could be differentiated by quantitative elastography by all systems (p < 0.001). The use of a linear probe yielded more reproducible measurements compared with use of a convex probe in 3/4 platforms.

Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of strain assessment in solid focal pancreatic lesions using real-time elastography in combination with endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Material and methods. Forty-eight solid focal pancreatic lesions in 39 patients were included prospectively over a 3-year period and studied by EUS with real-time elastography (EUS-RTE). Lesions previously described as cystic by CT were not included. Distribution patterns of tissue strain were assessed using strain ratio (SR) measurements, continuous visual analog scale (VAS), and a visual categorical score (VCS), based on color coding of relative strain. Final diagnosis was based on histopathology, fine-needle aspiration cytology, and/or follow-up for ≥6 months. Results. The 48 lesions included 11 adenocarcinomas, 7 malignant neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), 11 benign or indeterminate NETs, 8 focal pancreatic lesions, 2 microcystic adenomas, and 9 other benign lesions. Malignant lesions had significantly higher median SR (7.05 vs. 1.56) and VAS scores (93.0 vs. 63.5) than benign lesions. A receiver operation characteristic curve analysis showed sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 71%, when using SR = 4.4 as a cut-off for malignancy. The highest SR values were found in two benign microcystic adenomas. Conclusions. EUS-RTE with SR measurements and VAS evaluation demonstrated a significant strain difference between benign and malignant lesions. However, the variation within the entities was substantial and some benign lesions presented with low strain. Benign lesions were generally characterized by a strain similar to reference tissue, whereas malignant lesions were harder. The recorded strain pattern in individual lesions must be interpreted with caution.

This first position paper of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) on professional standards presents a common position across the different medical professions within EFSUMB regarding optimal standards for the performing and reporting of ultrasound examinations by any professional ultrasound operator. It describes general aspects of professionality that ensure procedure quality, effectiveness, efficiency, and sustainability in virtually all application fields of medical ultrasound. Recommendations are given related to safety and indication of ultrasound examinations, requirements for examination rooms, structured examination, systematic reporting of results, and management, communication and archiving of ultrasound data. The print version of this article is a short version. The long version is published online.