Respiratory diseases are extremely common conditions worldwide with a high social and economic impact. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the scientific evidence on the efficacy of thermal inhalation treatments to manage the signs and symptoms of all type of upper and lower respiratory diseases. The review was conducted according to the PRISMA recommendations. The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO platform (ID: CRD42024510869). The bibliographic search was performed using PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases without time limits up to January 2nd 2025. All experimental and semi-experimental studies conducted on humans, published in Italian and English, aimed to evaluate the effects of thermal inhalation treatments in the treatment of respiratory diseases were considered eligible. The quality of the studies was assessed using the CLEAR NPT scale. Overall, 27 studies were included, related to chronic and chronic-recurrent upper and lower respiratory tract diseases. The results agree on beneficial effects of thermal waters use, with an improvement in the sensation of nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, muco-ciliary transport time and lung function parameters. The therapeutic effects determined by thermal inhalation treatments is attributed to the composition and biochemical activity of the different waters, which lead, among other effects, to a regularization of the activity of the immune system. The results, although agreeing and encouraging, cannot be definitive due to the limitations of the studies included, especially their low quality and heterogeneity. Therefore, further clinical studies should be conducted using more appropriate methodologies, study designs and statistical analysis techniques.

Background/Objectives: In recent decades, the need for sustainable alternatives to traditional foods for the global population has become urgent. To this aim, edible insects, cultivated meat, and vegetables produced through soil-less farming have been proposed. This cross-sectional study was aimed at exploring willingness to eat these novel foods and its possible correlates in young Italian adults. Methods: An electronic questionnaire was administered to the student populations of 13 universities throughout the Italian territory. Results: The results show that insects and cultivated meat were widely acknowledged as possible food, while soil-free cultivation seems to be less known. Indeed, the percentage of participants who have heard of insects, cultivated meat, and soil-free cultivation was respectively equal to 91.5%, 84.7%, and 32.9%. However, the majority of respondents were uncertain about the sustainability of all the proposed products (52.6% for insects, 39.5% for cultivated meat, and 58.0% for soil-free cultivation, respectively), and the propensity to try and eat insects (9.5%) was lower than that declared for synthetic meat (22.8%) and products from soil-free cultivation (19.2%). However, the regression analysis showed that the propensity to eat these foods regularly is positively related to the confidence in their sustainability (p < 0.001). Willingness to try each of the proposed foods positively correlated with that declared for the others (p < 0.001). Conclusions: These findings highlight the need to implement interventions aimed at increasing awareness about the use of these products as alternatives to less sustainable foods and the importance of identifying consumer groups to which these interventions should be addressed.

Background/Objectives: Food technology neophobia (FTN), defined as the reluctance to accept or consume foods produced with novel or emerging food technologies, represents a psychological barrier to the adoption of sustainable and innovative dietary practices. This cross-sectional study investigated the prevalence of food technology neophobia and its associated factors among Italian university students. Methods: A total of 1788 undergraduates from 13 universities completed a validated online questionnaire between February and October 2024. The instrument included the Food Technology Neophobia Scale (FTNS), environmental attitude items, and demographic and dietary questions. Results: The mean FTNS score was 51.2 ± 14.0, suggesting moderate levels of neophobia. Multivariate logistic regression identified several factors inversely associated with neophobia: male gender (OR = 0.73, p = 0.003), paternal university education (OR = 0.73, p = 0.024), studying in Northern Italy (OR = 0.64, p < 0.001), dietary supplement use (OR = 0.74, p = 0.003), and pro-environmental attitudes (OR = 0.97, p < 0.001). Conversely, being a commuter student was associated with increased neophobia (OR = 1.29, p = 0.031). Conclusions: These findings highlight the influence of socio-demographic, behavioral, and attitudinal factors on the acceptance of new food technologies. Tailored strategies are recommended to address FTN in specific subgroups, particularly among female, commuter, and Southern Italian students, to enhance receptivity to food innovation and support sustainable dietary transitions.