Objective To analyze the changes induced by ocrelizumab in blood immune cells of patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS). Methods In this multicenter prospective study including 53 patients with PPMS who initiated ocrelizumab treatment, we determined effector, memory, and regulatory cells by flow cytometry at baseline and after 6 months of therapy. Wilcoxon matched paired tests were used to assess differences between baseline and 6 months9 results. p Values were corrected using the Bonferroni test. Results Ocrelizumab reduced the numbers of naive and memory B cells (p < 0.0001) and those of B cells producing interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) (p < 0.0001 in all cases). By contrast, the proportions of plasmablasts and B cells producing GM-CSF and TNFα increased significantly, suggesting the need for treatment continuation. We also observed a decrease in CD20⁺ T-cell numbers (p < 0.0001) and percentages (p < 0.0001), and a clear remodeling of the T-cell compartment characterized by relative increases of the naive/effector ratios in CD4⁺ (p = 0.002) and CD8⁺ (p = 0.002) T cells and relative decreases of CD4⁺ (p = 0.03) and CD8⁺ (p = 0.004) T cells producing interferon-gamma. Total monocyte numbers increased (p = 0.002), but no changes were observed in those producing inflammatory cytokines. The immunologic variations were associated with a reduction of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels (p = 0.008). The reduction was observed in patients with Gd-enhanced lesions at baseline and in Gd− patients with baseline sNfL >10 pg/mL. Conclusions In PPMS, effector B-cell depletion changed T-cell response toward a low inflammatory profile, resulting in decreased sNfL levels.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide clinicians with further understanding of the impact of treatment on patients' daily lives. In addition, real-world studies, which employ broader inclusion criteria than randomized trials, may help to inform prescribing decisions when selecting a disease-modifying therapy (DMT) to treat relapsing forms of MS (RMS). We sought to use PROs to determine patient treatment satisfaction and other treatment outcomes, and report safety and tolerability associated with teriflunomide, in the global, phase 4 Teri-PRO study (NCT01895335). Patients with RMS (N = 1000) received teriflunomide for 48 weeks per local labeling. The primary endpoint was Global Satisfaction with teriflunomide treatment measured by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM, V1.4). Secondary endpoints included TSQM scores at Week (W)48 vs baseline in patients switching to teriflunomide from other DMTs ('switchers'), additional PROs, and safety. Mean TSQM Global Satisfaction score at W48 was high (68.2). Switchers reported significant improvements across all four TSQM domains at W48 vs baseline (all p < 0.0001). Adverse events were consistent with teriflunomide clinical trials. Patients reported high treatment satisfaction with teriflunomide, with switchers also reporting improved treatment satisfaction vs baseline. High treatment satisfaction in patients with RMS may lead to improved adherence, and hence treatment outcomes.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can assist clinicians in understanding the impact of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) on the daily lives of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). With an increased number of DMTs becoming available, patients are now switching treatments more frequently in clinical practice. The effects of switching DMTs on a patient's daily life and their disease course may be reflected in PROs. The global, multicenter, open-label, phase 4 Teri-PRO study (NCT01895335), which was conducted in routine clinical practice, previously showed statistically and clinically significant increases in patient-reported treatment satisfaction in patients switching to teriflunomide from other DMTs. The impact of switching to teriflunomide from other DMTs on treatment satisfaction and a range of additional PROs was also evaluated. Patients with relapsing forms of MS (N = 1000) received teriflunomide for 48 weeks per local labeling. Outcomes assessed in this analysis included treatment satisfaction (as measured by Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication [Version 1.4]), disability worsening (as measured using the Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score, the Patient-Determined Disease Steps scale, and the Multiple Sclerosis Performance Scale), cognition (as measured using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test [SDMT]), treated relapses, quality of life (as measured by the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life [MusiQoL] questionnaire and the Stern Leisure Activity Scale), and safety/tolerability over the course of the study in the subgroup of patients switching to teriflunomide from another DMT (n = 594). Patients reported significant improvements in treatment satisfaction scores following the switch to teriflunomide regardless of the reason for treating with teriflunomide (Global Satisfaction, disease worsening: baseline, 46.0, Week 48, 65.1; convenience: baseline, 57.4, Week 48, 72.4; intolerance: baseline, 50.9, Week 48, 71.1; side effects: baseline, 49.7, Week 48, 67.2; P < 0.0001 in all comparisons). These patients also showed improvement or stability in PROs evaluating disability worsening, cognition, and quality of life (EDSS: baseline, 3.1, Week 48, 3.0; SDMT: baseline, 0.975, Week 48, 0.978; MusiQoL: baseline, 67.5, Week 48, 69.5). The safety and tolerability profile of teriflunomide was consistent with that observed in other teriflunomide clinical trials. This analysis of the Teri-PRO study demonstrates the value of switching to teriflunomide from other DMTs in a real-world, clinical practice setting. The high levels of treatment satisfaction associated with teriflunomide in Teri-PRO may lead to improved adherence and thus improved outcomes.

Objective To understand COVID-19 characteristics in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and identify high-risk individuals due to their immunocompromised state resulting from the use of disease-modifying treatments. Methods Retrospective and multicenter registry in patients with MS with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis and available disease course (mild = ambulatory; severe = hospitalization; and critical = intensive care unit/death). Cases were analyzed for associations between MS characteristics and COVID-19 course and for identifying risk factors for a fatal outcome. Results Of the 326 patients analyzed, 120 were cases confirmed by real-time PCR, 34 by a serologic test, and 205 were suspected. Sixty-nine patients (21.3%) developed severe infection, 10 (3%) critical, and 7 (2.1%) died. Ambulatory patients were higher in relapsing MS forms, treated with injectables and oral first-line agents, whereas more severe cases were observed in patients on pulsed immunosuppressors and critical cases among patients with no therapy. Severe and critical infections were more likely to affect older males with comorbidities, with progressive MS forms, a longer disease course, and higher disability. Fifteen of 33 patients treated with rituximab were hospitalized. Four deceased patients have progressive MS, 5 were not receiving MS therapy, and 2 were treated (natalizumab and rituximab). Multivariate analysis showed age (OR 1.09, 95% CI, 1.04–1.17) as the only independent risk factor for a fatal outcome. Conclusions This study has not demonstrated the presumed critical role of MS therapy in the course of COVID-19 but evidenced that people with MS with advanced age and disease, in progressive course, and those who are more disabled have a higher probability of severe and even fatal disease.

The demographics and management of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) differ across geographical regions, but it is unclear whether/how these differences affect treatment outcomes. The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to assess teriflunomide use and patient-reported outcomes in the United States (US) and the rest of the world (ROW) in the phase 4 Teri-PRO study (NCT01895335). In the phase 4, real-world, Teri-PRO study, patients with relapsing forms of MS received teriflunomide for 48 weeks according to local labeling. The primary endpoint was treatment satisfaction measured using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication Version 1.4 (TSQM 1.4). Secondary endpoints included scores on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Performance Scale (MSPS), and Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS), and occurrence of adverse events. Primary and secondary endpoints were assessed at baseline and Week 48. An exploratory subgroup analysis assessed PROs in the black patient population. The US and ROW groups included 545 and 455 patients, respectively. The mean age of patients in the ROW group was lower, they had a shorter mean time since first symptoms of MS, and had lower mean EDSS scores at baseline, compared with the US group (all p < 0.0001). Black patients made up 9% of US patients vs 0.2% of ROW patients. TSQM global satisfaction scores and effectiveness, side effects, and convenience subscale scores were significantly improved from baseline to Week 48 (all p < 0.0001). Disability measures were stable from baseline to Week 48 for both groups, despite different baseline level scores between the two groups. The overall proportion of patients who experienced an AE was similar across both groups. Fewer patients in the US group vs the ROW group reported hair thinning (16.1% vs 31.2%). Black patients showed comparable baseline demographics and disease characteristics and similar change over time in PROs compared with the overall US group. Patient differences observed at baseline between the US and ROW groups suggest variation in teriflunomide prescribing practices in the real-world Teri-PRO study. Improvement in treatment satisfaction and stability of disability measures were comparable between patients in the US and ROW. This suggests that teriflunomide was effective despite differences in baseline demographics and possible cultural and management differences between these geographical regions.