The water conservation capacity of the litter and soil layers of forest ecosystems improves the function of forest ecosystems in conserving soil and water. Plantation restoration plays a key role in preventing soil erosion. In order to evaluate the water conservation capacity of plantation restoration in Latosol soil-eroded region, we analyzed the litter thickness and mass, water absorption process, water holding recovery process, and soil water holding capacity of five restoration types (Hevea brasiliensis, Acacia mangium, Eucalyptus robusta, Acacia–Eucalyptus, and Acacia–Hevea) in the Mahuangling Watershed, Hainan province. The results showed that the thickness of the litter ranged from approximately 3.42 ± 0.24 to 4.73 ± 0.81 cm, and the litter mass ranged from 5.04 ± 1.52 t·ha⁻¹ to 13.16 ± 1.76 t·ha⁻¹, with higher litter mass in the SL layer than in the UL layer. The litter mass of A. mangium was higher than that of H. brasiliensis, E. robusta, Acacia–Eucalyptus, and Acacia–Hevea, which was 3.16 ± 1.76 t·ha⁻¹. A. mangium forest was significantly higher than other plantation restoration types in terms of the maximum water retention capacity (Q_max) and the effective water retention capacity (Q_eff). The soil bulk weight ranged from approximately 1.52 ± 0.09 to 1.59 ± 0.08 g·cm⁻³, and porosity ranged from 31.77 ± 4.72 to 35.62 ± 3.02%, both of which increased with the depth of the soil layer. The water holding capacity of 0–60 cm soil varied from approximately 12.94 ± 7.91 to 45.02 ± 31.79 t·ha⁻¹, with A. mangium having the best soil permeability and the strongest soil water holding capacity. The entropy weight method was used to conduct a comprehensive evaluation, and the results showed that the water conservation capacity of the soil layer was 1.26 times higher than that of the litter layer, in which the water conservation capacity of A. mangium was the strongest, with a comprehensive evaluation value of 0.2854, which effectively intercepted rainfall and reduced surface runoff. Hence, we suggest that the planting of A. mangium should be considered in future ecological restoration projects of the erosion area of Mahuangling in order to improve the function of conserving soil and water in a restoration forest ecosystem.

Magnoliaceae plants have high ornamental value, resulting in their widespread use in landscaping construction, and play a major role in the ecological functions of soil and water conservation. However, the landscape value of magnolias from the perspective of the water conservation capacity of the litter and soil layers is not yet fully understood; this restricts the popularization and application of Magnoliaceae plants in landscaping. In this study, we determined the characteristics of the litter thickness and mass, water absorption process, and soil water-holding capacity associated with five Magnoliaceae plants (Michelia shiluensis, M. crassipes, M. foveolata, M. maudiae, and M. odora). (1) The total litter thickness ranged from 2.29 to 5.58 cm, with M. crassipes achieving the highest value. The total litter mass for M. shiluensis (25.11 ± 2.58 t·ha⁻¹) was largely greater than that for the other magnolias. The mass of the un-decomposed litter (UL) layer was 1.31- to 3.82-fold larger than that of the semi-decomposed litter (SL). (2) The maximum water retention capacity (H_max) and effective water retention capacity (H_eff) of M. shiluensis were markedly larger than those of the other magnolias. (3) The W_max and W_eff of the UL layer were greater than those of the SL layer. (4) The soil bulk density varied from approximately 1.22 ± 0.08 g·cm⁻³ to 1.55 ± 0.08 g·cm⁻³, and the total soil porosity varied from 40.03 ± 3.44% to 46.42 ± 1.02%. The soil bulk density rose with an increasing soil depth, yet the total porosity was reduced. The soil water-holding capacity of the 0–30 cm soil layer varied from approximately 26.23 to 70.33 t·ha⁻¹, with soil near M. crassipes having the greatest water-holding capacity. The soil water infiltration recorded for M. crassipes was significantly higher than that of the other magnolias. The water conservation capacities associated with M. crassipes and M. shiluensis were the largest, which may suggest that these species are better at increasing rainfall interception, lightening splash erosion, and reducing surface runoff. Hence, we suggest that M. crassipes and M. shiluensis should be prioritized in landscaping applications.