Georg D. Strbac

Prof. Dr. Georg D. Strbac


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2017 in Journal of Endodontics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GSGeorg D. Strbac
Georg D. Strbac
ASAlbrecht Schnappauf
Albrecht Schnappauf
KGKatharina Giannis
Katharina Giannis
AMAndreas Moritz
Andreas Moritz
CUChristian Ulm
Christian Ulm

1 December 2016 in Journal of Endodontics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GSGeorg D. Strbac
Georg D. Strbac
ASAlbrecht Schnappauf
Albrecht Schnappauf
KGKatharina Giannis
Katharina Giannis
MBMichael H. Bertl
Michael H. Bertl
AMAndreas Moritz
Andreas Moritz
CUChristian Ulm
Christian Ulm

26 September 2012 in Clinical Oral Implants Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GSGeorg D. Strbac
Georg D. Strbac
EUEwald Unger
Ewald Unger
RDRené Donner
René Donner
MBManfred Bijak
Manfred Bijak
GWGeorg Watzek
Georg Watzek
WZWerner Zechner
Werner Zechner

29 April 2012 in Clinical Oral Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GSGeorg D. Strbac
Georg D. Strbac
AFAndrea Foltin
Andrea Foltin
AGAndré Gahleitner
André Gahleitner
HBHans-Peter Bantleon
Hans-Peter Bantleon
GWGeorg Watzek
Georg Watzek
TBThomas Bernhart
Thomas Bernhart

24 January 2013 in Clinical Oral Implants Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GSGeorg D. Strbac
Georg D. Strbac
KGKatharina Giannis
Katharina Giannis
EUEwald Unger
Ewald Unger
MMMartina Mittlböck
Martina Mittlböck
GWGeorg Watzek
Georg Watzek
WZWerner Zechner
Werner Zechner

21 November 2020 in Clinical Oral Implants Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DTDino Tur
Dino Tur
KGKatharina Giannis
Katharina Giannis
EUEwald Unger
Ewald Unger
MMMartina Mittlboeck
Martina Mittlboeck
XRXiaohui Rausch-Fan
Xiaohui Rausch-Fan
GSGeorg D. Strbac
Georg D. Strbac
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate thermal effects of ceramic and metal implant drills during implant site preparation using a standardised bovine model.Material and Methods: A total of 320 automated intermittent osteotomies of 10‐ and 16‐mm drilling depths were performed using zirconium dioxide‐based and stainless steel drills. Various drill diameters (2.0/ 2.2, 2.8, 3.5, 4.2 mm ∅) and different cooling methods (without/ with external saline irrigation) were investigated at room temperature (21 ± 1°C). Temperature changes were recorded in real time using two custom‐built multichannel thermoprobes in 1‐ and 2‐mm distance to the osteotomy site. For comparisons, a linear mixed model was estimated.Results: Comparing thermal effects, significantly lower temperatures could be detected with steel‐based drills in various drill diameters, regardless of drilling depth or irrigation method. Recorded temperatures for metal drills of all diameters and drilling depths using external irrigation were below the defined critical temperature threshold of 47°C, whereas ceramic drills of smaller diameters reached or exceeded the harmful temperature threshold at 16‐mm drilling depths, regardless of whether irrigation was applied or not. The results of this study suggest that the highest temperature changes were not found at the deepest point of the osteotomy site but were observed at subcortical and deeper layers of bone, depending on drill material, drill diameter, drilling depth and irrigation method.Conclusions: This standardised investigation revealed drill material and geometry to have a substantial impact on heat generation, as well as external irrigation, drilling depth and drill diameter.