Explore full metrics on Scilit
(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)
<mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>CeO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>CeO2 . We prepared the nanoparticles by combustion synthesis and characterized the nanopowders by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy. The good sintering properties of these nanopowders allowed us to obtain very dense ceramics of Y-doped <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>CeO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>CeO2 ( <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo></mml:mo><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:mo>%</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math>90% theoretical density) and keep the grain size small, in some cases around <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.3em"></mml:mspace><mml:mi>nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>100nm , by using sintering temperatures as low as <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1250</mml:mn><mml:mo>°</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>1250°C and very short annealing times between 5 and <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>60</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.3em"></mml:mspace><mml:mi>min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>60min . The microstructure of these nanoceramics was analyzed by atomic force microscopy and SEM. The most interesting feature of these nanoceramics is that the electrical measurements in <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>N2 <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.3em"></mml:mspace><mml:mi>atm</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math>(pO2=3.5×10−6atm) carried out by the four-point dc technique showed a considerable increase in total conductivity in comparison with the measurements in air or oxygen in the range <mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>700</mml:mn><mml:mo>–</mml:mo><mml:mn>900</mml:mn><mml:mo>°</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>700–900°C . This conductivity enhancement might be associated with the electronic contribution to the total conductivity and it is clearly higher than the ionic conductivity in the same temperature range.No biography provided yet