Purpose: This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of Saudi female nurses working in mixed-gender healthcare environments and understand how they navigate professional identity while managing cultural expectations in Saudi Arabia’s evolving healthcare landscape. Methods: A descriptive phenomenological qualitative study grounded in symbolic interactionism was conducted using in-depth semi-structured interviews with 20 Saudi female nurses working in mixed-gender healthcare settings in Riyadh. Interviews were conducted in Arabic and systematically translated using forward–backward translation protocols. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi’s phenomenological analysis framework to identify essential themes and meanings. Trustworthiness was established through credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability strategies, including member checking with 6 participants, peer debriefing, and comprehensive audit trails. Results: Four major themes emerged: (1) Reconciling Traditional Values with Professional Duties, (2) Negotiating Gender Dynamics in Clinical Practice, (3) Developing Professional Identity Amid Cultural Tensions, and (4) Organizational Support and Environmental Adaptation. Participants demonstrated remarkable resilience in balancing cultural expectations with professional responsibilities while developing sophisticated coping strategies. Conclusions: Saudi female nurses actively construct their professional identities while navigating complex cultural landscapes. The study reveals the need for organizational policies that support cultural sensitivity while promoting professional growth and gender equality in healthcare settings. These findings may inform healthcare workforce development in other Islamic and culturally transitioning contexts.

To explore how nurses working in Saudi–affiliated health-care settings experience and negotiate quality indicators within the context of health syste

Leadership at the point of care is pivotal to safety, flow, and patient experience in ambulatory settings. In Saudi Arabia, the Excellence in Care (EiC) pr

Background: Perceived inequity in work allocation has well-documented consequences for nurse job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and patient safety. Despite this recognition, empirical research examining how nurses in Middle Eastern healthcare contexts conceptualize allocation justice remains limited. This qualitative study explored Saudi registered nurses’ perceptions of work allocation justice, identified the organizational factors shaping those perceptions, and examined their implications for nurse well-being and quality of care. Methods: A qualitative design employing reflexive thematic analysis was used, grounded in constructivism. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 17 purposively sampled registered nurses from three Riyadh-based healthcare facilities. Credibility was established through data, method, and analyst triangulation; peer debriefing; and member checking (12 of the 17 participants were purposively selected for member checking to represent the full range of experiences; 11 of those 12 confirmed thematic plausibility). Thematic saturation was reached at interview 13. Results: Six interconnected themes emerged: (1) Understanding Work Justice; (2) Personal Experiences; (3) Influencing Factors; (4) Psychological and Professional Impacts; (5) Institutional and Administrative Support; and (6) Future Perspectives. Participants define fairness as contextual equity and relational respect rather than simple numerical equality. Inequities were driven by staffing constraints, leadership styles, and policy gaps, leading to burnout and reduced organizational commitment. Conclusions: Saudi nurses experience meaningful allocation inequities arising from structural constraints, leadership variability, and the absence of written allocation policies. Addressing these inequities requires coordinated action on policy transparency, objective criteria, and psychologically safe communication channels. These findings provide contextually grounded, evidence-informed guidance for developing equitable nursing work environments that support workforce retention and patient safety.

Background: Chronic heart failure (CHF) in older adults requires sustained self-management and close follow-up, yet day-to-day care is often carried out by families with support from primary healthcare nurses. In Saudi Arabia, where family caregiving is culturally normative, collaboration between nurses and patients’ families may be pivotal to effective CHF management, but remains insufficiently understood in primary healthcare contexts. Methods: A qualitative study informed by an interpretive phenomenological approach was conducted. Participants (n = 24; 12 nurses and 12 family caregivers) were recruited using purposive sampling from primary healthcare centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted in Arabic or English, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke’s six-phase framework. Strategies to enhance trustworthiness included member checking, peer debriefing, maintenance of an audit trail, and reflexive journaling. Results: Twenty-four participants (12 nurses and 12 family caregivers) were interviewed. Four interrelated themes were generated from both nurses’ and family caregivers’ accounts. (1) “We Are Caring Together”: Collaboration was experienced as shared responsibility for daily CHF management, grounded in trust; (2) Navigating Roles and Boundaries: Participants described unclear expectations, role overlap, and tension between professional authority and family knowledge; (3) Communication as the Engine of Collaboration: Effective partnerships depended on clear information exchange, caregiver-tailored education, and continuity of contact, while communication gaps created uncertainty and delayed support-seeking; and (4) Cultural and System Constraints Shaping Collaboration: Strong family obligation motivated caregiving but also intensified moral pressure and limited help-seeking, while time pressure and fragmented services constrained meaningful engagement and continuity across settings. Conclusions: Nurse–family collaboration in CHF management is relational, shaped by trust, role negotiation, and communication, and constrained by cultural norms and system pressures. This study contributes to the literature by demonstrating how moral obligation, hierarchical professional norms, and system fragmentation distinctively shape collaboration in the Saudi primary care context, extending existing conceptualizations derived primarily from Western individualist settings. Strengthening collaboration requires explicit role clarification, health literacy–informed caregiver education, continuity of contact, and organizational supports. Findings are limited by purposive sampling, single-city context, and exclusion of patient perspectives.