Oncology nursing is one of healthcare’s most emotionally demanding specialties, characterized by sustained exposure to patient suffering and mortality. While global burnout rates reach 40–60%, emotional intelligence (EI) is a potential protective resource that remains underexamined in Middle Eastern contexts. Despite growing global evidence, little is known about these relationships in Middle Eastern healthcare systems, where cultural norms and workforce structures may shape emotional processes differently. This study examined whether EI was significantly associated with lower burnout across personal, work-related, and client-related dimensions among oncology nurses in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional correlational study enrolled 172 oncology nurses from three tertiary hospitals in Riyadh. Participants completed validated Arabic versions of the Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Test (SSEIT) and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI). Hierarchical regression analyses examined predictive relationships while controlling for age and experience. Results: EI demonstrated significant inverse correlations with personal (r = −0.41), work-related (r = −0.38), and client-related burnout (r = −0.33, p < 0.001). In hierarchical models, EI emerged as a significant predictor of lower scores across all dimensions, explaining 11–17% of unique variance beyond demographic factors. The strongest association was with personal burnout. Causality cannot be inferred from this cross-sectional design. Conclusion: EI functions as a significant protective factor against burnout. Healthcare organizations should integrate EI development into professional training to strengthen workforce resilience and sustain care quality.

Background: Chronic heart failure (CHF) in older adults requires sustained self-management and close follow-up, yet day-to-day care is often carried out by families with support from primary healthcare nurses. In Saudi Arabia, where family caregiving is culturally normative, collaboration between nurses and patients’ families may be pivotal to effective CHF management, but remains insufficiently understood in primary healthcare contexts. Methods: A qualitative study informed by an interpretive phenomenological approach was conducted. Participants (n = 24; 12 nurses and 12 family caregivers) were recruited using purposive sampling from primary healthcare centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted in Arabic or English, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke’s six-phase framework. Strategies to enhance trustworthiness included member checking, peer debriefing, maintenance of an audit trail, and reflexive journaling. Results: Twenty-four participants (12 nurses and 12 family caregivers) were interviewed. Four interrelated themes were generated from both nurses’ and family caregivers’ accounts. (1) “We Are Caring Together”: Collaboration was experienced as shared responsibility for daily CHF management, grounded in trust; (2) Navigating Roles and Boundaries: Participants described unclear expectations, role overlap, and tension between professional authority and family knowledge; (3) Communication as the Engine of Collaboration: Effective partnerships depended on clear information exchange, caregiver-tailored education, and continuity of contact, while communication gaps created uncertainty and delayed support-seeking; and (4) Cultural and System Constraints Shaping Collaboration: Strong family obligation motivated caregiving but also intensified moral pressure and limited help-seeking, while time pressure and fragmented services constrained meaningful engagement and continuity across settings. Conclusions: Nurse–family collaboration in CHF management is relational, shaped by trust, role negotiation, and communication, and constrained by cultural norms and system pressures. This study contributes to the literature by demonstrating how moral obligation, hierarchical professional norms, and system fragmentation distinctively shape collaboration in the Saudi primary care context, extending existing conceptualizations derived primarily from Western individualist settings. Strengthening collaboration requires explicit role clarification, health literacy–informed caregiver education, continuity of contact, and organizational supports. Findings are limited by purposive sampling, single-city context, and exclusion of patient perspectives.

Background: Rural and remote health systems are diverse; while many of these settings face persistent workforce shortages and access gaps, not all are underserved. Nurses play a critical role in improving access, continuity, and quality of care in these contexts. However, evidence on their roles, the challenges they face, and the outcomes associated with their contributions remains fragmented. Objective: To map the roles, challenges, and reported outcomes of nurses working in rural and remote healthcare settings, and to examine the quality and scope of the available evidence. Design: This study employed JBI scoping review methodology and is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Methods: Eligible studies involved registered nurses (RNs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) providing care in rural or remote settings and reporting at least one outcome related to patients, services, or health systems. Six bibliographic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) plus Google Scholar for supplementary grey literature retrieval and targeted grey literature were searched (from 1 January 2000 to 30 September 2025). The lead author conducted screening and data extraction, supported by a 10% calibration pilot and structured peer debriefing. Design-specific critical appraisal was undertaken descriptively to inform interpretation but did not determine inclusion. Results: From 22 primary empirical studies (plus 2 contextual-only entries; 24 total, nurses’ roles clustered into direct clinical care, care coordination/navigation, telehealth facilitation, and health promotion. Reported outcomes were predominantly in access/utilization (e.g., time-to-care), quality and safety indicators, and patient-reported outcomes/experiences; clinical endpoints were less common. Conclusions: Nurses in rural and remote settings enact broad, adaptive roles that appear to support healthcare access and service continuity. The evidence base is predominantly descriptive, and causal claims about effectiveness cannot be drawn from the available studies. Standardized outcome frameworks, multi-reviewer methodologies, and effectiveness-focused primary research are needed to advance this field.

Background: Family-centered care (FCC) is a foundational principle in pediatric healthcare, yet its implementation in culturally specific contexts remains poorly understood. In Saudi Arabia, Islamic values, collective family structures, and gendered caregiving norms shape how mothers engage with pediatric intensive care in ways that existing Western-derived FCC models do not fully capture. The aim of this study was to explore Saudi mothers’ experiences of family-centered care during their children’s pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions, focusing on perceived barriers, cultural negotiations, and evolving advocacy strategies. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted with 17 Saudi mothers whose children had been admitted to PICUs across major hospitals in Saudi Arabia within the preceding 12 months. Semi-structured interviews lasting 40–70 min were conducted in Arabic using a pilot-tested, 15-item guide. Data were analyzed through Braun and Clarke’s six-phase reflexive thematic analysis. Trustworthiness was strengthened through member checking, reflexive journaling, negative case analysis, and investigator triangulation. Reporting adheres to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). Result: Five interconnected themes emerged: (1) confronting crisis and uncertainty, (2) renegotiating maternal identity, (3) brokering culture within biomedicine, (4) forging trust with care teams, and (5) evolving into advocates. These themes trace a developmental arc from initial disorientation through progressive empowerment, shaped at every stage by culturally grounded resources and constraints. Mothers functioned as cultural brokers performing invisible labor that healthcare systems neither recognized nor supported. Conclusions: Saudi mothers in PICUs engage in sophisticated cultural mediation between family systems and biomedical institutions under conditions of acute stress. Findings underscore the need for structurally embedded cultural responsiveness in PICU policy, including continuous cultural assessment, care-team continuity, and family advocacy support.