Julian Frey

Mr. Julian Frey

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2020 in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FSFelix Schiefer
Felix Schiefer
TKTeja Kattenborn
Teja Kattenborn
AFAnnett Frick
Annett Frick
JFJulian Frey
Julian Frey
PSPeter Schall
Peter Schall
SSSebastian Schmidtlein
Sebastian Schmidtlein

4 July 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SESimon Ecke
Simon Ecke
JDJan Dempewolf
Jan Dempewolf
JFJulian Frey
Julian Frey
ASAndreas Schwaller
Andreas Schwaller
EEEwald Endres
Ewald Endres
TSThomas Seifert
Thomas Seifert
In recent years, technological advances have led to the increasing use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for forestry applications. One emerging field for drone application is forest health monitoring (FHM). Common approaches for FHM involve small-scale resource-extensive fieldwork combined with traditional remote sensing platforms. However, the highly dynamic nature of forests requires timely and repetitive data acquisition, often at very high spatial resolution, where conventional remote sensing techniques reach the limits of feasibility. UAVs have shown that they can meet the demands of flexible operation and high spatial resolution. This is also reflected in a rapidly growing number of publications using drones to study forest health. Only a few reviews exist which do not cover the whole research history of UAV-based FHM. Since a comprehensive review is becoming critical to identify research gaps, trends, and drawbacks, we offer a systematic analysis of 99 papers covering the last ten years of research related to UAV-based monitoring of forests threatened by biotic and abiotic stressors. Advances in drone technology are being rapidly adopted and put into practice, further improving the economical use of UAVs. Despite the many advantages of UAVs, such as their flexibility, relatively low costs, and the possibility to fly below cloud cover, we also identified some shortcomings: (1) multitemporal and long-term monitoring of forests is clearly underrepresented; (2) the rare use of hyperspectral and LiDAR sensors must drastically increase; (3) complementary data from other RS sources are not sufficiently being exploited; (4) a lack of standardized workflows poses a problem to ensure data uniformity; (5) complex machine learning algorithms and workflows obscure interpretability and hinders widespread adoption; (6) the data pipeline from acquisition to final analysis often relies on commercial software at the expense of open-source tools.

4 May 2019 in AMBIO
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLena Gustafsson
Lena Gustafsson
JBJürgen Bauhus
Jürgen Bauhus
TAThomas Asbeck
Thomas Asbeck
AAAndrey Lessa Derci Augustynczik
Andrey Lessa Derci Augustynczik
MBMarco Basile
Marco Basile
ISIlse Storch
Ilse Storch
Retention forestry implies that biological legacies like dead and living trees are deliberately selected and retained beyond harvesting cycles to benefit biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. This model has been applied for several decades in even-aged, clearcutting (CC) systems but less so in uneven-aged, continuous-cover forestry (CCF). We provide an overview of retention in CCF in temperate regions of Europe, currently largely focused on habitat trees and dead wood. The relevance of current meta-analyses and many other studies on retention in CC is limited since they emphasize larger patches in open surroundings. Therefore, we reflect here on the ecological foundations and socio-economic frameworks of retention approaches in CCF, and highlight several areas with development potential for the future. Conclusions from this perspective paper, based on both research and current practice on several continents, although highlighting Europe, are also relevant to other temperate regions of the world using continuous-cover forest management approaches.

21 June 2022 in ISPRS Open Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TKTeja Kattenborn
Teja Kattenborn
FSFelix Schiefer
Felix Schiefer
JFJulian Frey
Julian Frey
HFHannes Feilhauer
Hannes Feilhauer
MMMiguel D. Mahecha
Miguel D. Mahecha
CDCarsten F. Dormann
Carsten F. Dormann

9 June 2018 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JFJulian Frey
Julian Frey
Kyle R KovachKyle R Kovach
Kyle R Kovach
SSSimon Stemmler
Simon Stemmler
BKBarbara Koch
Barbara Koch
Structural analysis of forests by UAV is currently growing in popularity. Given the reduction in platform costs, and the number of algorithms available to analyze data output, the number of applications has grown rapidly. Forest structures are not only linked to economic value in forestry, but also to biodiversity and vulnerability issues. LiDAR remains the most promising technique for forest structural assessment, but small LiDAR sensors suitable for UAV applications are expensive and are limited to a few manufactures. The estimation of 3D-structures from two-dimensional image sequences called ‘Structure from motion’ (SfM) overcomes this limitation by photogrammetrically reconstructing point clouds similar to those rendered from LiDAR sensors. The result of these techniques in highly structured terrain strongly depends on the methods employed during image acquisition, therefore structural indices might be vulnerable to misspecifications in flight campaigns. In this paper, we outline how image overlap and ground sampling distances affect image reconstruction completeness in 2D and 3D. Higher image overlaps and coarser GSDs have a clearly positive influence on reconstruction quality. Therefore, higher accuracy requirements in the GSD must be compensated by a higher image overlap. The best results are achieved with an image overlap of > 95% and a resolution of > 5 cm. The most important environmental factors have been found to be wind and terrain elevation, which could be an indicator of vegetation density.

1 January 2019 in Forest Ecology and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TAThomas Asbeck
Thomas Asbeck
PPPatrick Pyttel
Patrick Pyttel
JFJulian Frey
Julian Frey
JBJürgen Bauhus
Jürgen Bauhus