Simulation-based education (SBE) is a fundamental teaching method that complements traditional teaching modalities. SBE has improved students’ knowledge, understanding, and numerous essential skills within undergraduate pharmacy education, similar to traditional teaching methods. However, SBE has become crucial for developing students’ teamwork, decision-making, and communication skills. Even though the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) has acknowledged the benefit of SBE in interprofessional education (IPE) and the introductory pharmacy practice experience (IPPE). This article provides evidence that SBE can be effective beyond that. This narrative review is focused on the literature related to SBE modalities and the assessment methods of student learning outcomes in the undergraduate pharmacy curriculum. The review illustrates that SBE is an effective teaching method that could be utilized within the pharmacy curriculum. The review also could help pharmacy educators decide on the best modality and placement of integrating patient simulation within the pharmacy curriculum. Combining multiple simulation techniques may be the best way to achieve the desired student learning outcomes.

The Saudi Society of Clinical Pharmacy (SSCP) is a scientific and professional society in the field of clinical pharmacy that operates under the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties governance. The SSCP believes that there is a need to define and describe many aspects related to the clinical pharmacy profession in Saudi Arabia. Moreover, there is an increasing demand for promoting the concept of clinical pharmacy and developing a consensus regarding the scope of practice and clinical pharmacist's required postgraduate education and training in Saudi Arabia. This paper is intended to present several position statements by the SSCP that define the concept of clinical pharmacy, describe the required education and training, and highlight clinical pharmacists' scope of practice in Saudi Arabia. This paper calls for further investigations that examine the impact of clinical pharmacists on individual and population health levels.

Background: The use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains limited, especially in those with other compelling indications. Thus, this study aimed to describe the prescribing patterns of GLP-1-RA and SGLT2i in patients with T2DM and to determine the factors that affect the prescribing of these medications.Methods: This multicenter retrospective cross-sectional study reviewed the electronic health records of adult patients diagnosed with T2DM who received care between January and December 2020. The patients were classified according to their compelling indications into “patients who are more likely” to benefit from SGLT2i or GLP-1 RA and “patients who are less likely” to benefit from them. They were then further categorized depending on whether these medications were prescribed.Results: A total of 1,220 patients were included; most were female (56.9%). SGLT2i or GLP-1 RA were preferably prescribed in only 19% of the patients for reasons including BMI ≥ 27 kg/m² (85.6%), uncontrolled T2DM (68.5%), high risk for ASCVD (23.9%), or established ASCVD (14%). The remaining 81.0% were underprescribed these agents. Patients at an older age or with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack had higher odds of being underprescribed (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01–1.03 and OR 2.86; 95% CI: 1.33–6.15), respectively.Conclusion: The results concur with those of previous studies highlighting the underutilization of GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i in patients with T2DM but also with compelling indications. To optimize the use of GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i for their additional benefits, prescribers need to assess the benefits of using these agents in patients who would likely benefit from them, regardless of DM control.

Background: GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are used in the management of type II diabetes mellitus or obesity, although its role in patients with type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM) has been debated. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of GLP-1RA in patients with T1DM using real-world data. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted at three tertiary medical centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The study followed up patients (>16 years old) with T1DM treated with insulin followed by GLP-1RA add-on therapy. The efficacy outcomes included changes in HbA1c, body weight, and insulin requirements from baseline to each follow-up visit. The main safety outcomes assessed included hypoglycemic events and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. Results: The study included 144 patients with a mean age of 33.0 ± 10.1 years. Semaglutide was the most used GLP-1RA (63.9%) followed by liraglutide (34.0%). From baseline to 3-month follow-up, HbA1c (mean difference (MD) = −0.8%; p = 0.0053), weight (MD = −2.4 kg; p = 0.0253), and daily basal insulin dose (MD = −2.1 units; p = 0.0349) were significantly reduced. Likewise, HbA1c (MD = −0.5%; p = 0.0004), weight (MD = −3.6 kg; p < 0.0001), and daily basal insulin (MD = −2.4 units; p = 0.0282) were significantly reduced at the 4–6-month follow-up. The significant reductions in HbA1c, weight, and daily basal insulin levels were consistent for up to 18-month follow-up. Only one patient had a major hypoglycemic event, whereas 8.3% of the patients had GI adverse events. Conclusions: Overall, significant improvements in glycemic control, weight loss, and insulin requirements were observed with the use of GLP-1RA in patients with T1DM, with a limited number of GI adverse events.

Background: The use of simulation-based education (SBE) in pharmacy education can help students acquire the essential clinical knowledge and skills for practice and can enhance patients' safety. Simulation-based training has been implemented in inter-professional education training, introductory pharmacy practice experiences, pharmacy residency training. Still, there is limited information in the literature that assesses the use of simulation in advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE). Objective: To evaluate the impact of integrating SBE into APPE on students' learning outcomes, training costs, and satisfaction. Method: This study presents a new training model of a 5-week clerkship experience where sixth-year pharmacy students alternate between hospital wards and simulation rooms. Student assessment rubrics were used to measure students’ achievements and report faculty feedback. Students filled scenario evaluation forms to assess their simulation satisfaction rate. Results: A total of 57 students completed a full block of simulation-based, followed by hospital-based blocks practicing in the same medical specialty in both blocks. This newly structured experience provided fourteen direct patient care training seats per rotation and saved around 25,000 Saudi Riyals per rotation. The mean grades in both simulation and hospital-based blocks were mostly above 90% in all learning outcomes. Cognitive skills and affect learning outcomes mean grades were higher in the simulation-based group—most of the students being satisfied with the simulation scenarios. Conclusion: SBE integration into APPE can supplement hospital-based experiential training to achieve the best learning outcomes with improved students' satisfaction.