Background: A single lumbar-mounted inertial sensor offers a practical alternative to optoelectronic systems for gait analysis, simplifying measurements and improving usability in the clinical field. However, its validity can be influenced by sensor placement and signal choice. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel algorithm for estimating spatiotemporal parameters using anteroposterior linear acceleration and angular velocity around the sagittal axis using a single inertial measurement unit (IMU) placed on the lumbar region. The proposed algorithm was validated comparing the parameters computed by the algorithm with the ones computed using a commercial wearable system based on a two-foot-mounted IMU configuration. Thirty healthy subjects underwent a 2 min walk test, and five spatiotemporal parameters were computed using the two methodologies. Study results showed that cadence and gait cycle time exhibited very high agreement, with only a small, statistically significant bias in cadence negligible for practical purposes. In contrast, swing, stance, and double-support parameters showed disagreement due to the presence of systematic proportional errors. This work introduces a novel algorithm for gait event detection and spatiotemporal parameter estimation, addressing uncertainties related to sensor placement, metric models, processing techniques, and signal selection, while avoiding synchronization issues associated with using multiple sensors.

Motion sickness (MS), or kinetosis, is a condition experienced by some individuals in response to rhythmic or irregular body motion. Multiple studies have explored its neurobiological mechanisms and countermeasures, with the sensory-conflict hypothesis remaining the most accepted explanation. Heart-rate variability (HRV) and electrocardiography provide complementary autonomic nervous system perspectives that may support MS assessments. From an applied viewpoint, reliable HRV markers could enable the early detection and continuous monitoring of MS in real-world contexts, such as autonomous vehicles, where passenger comfort and safety are critical, motivating contact-free cardiac sensing for unobtrusive monitoring. This systematic review examines the value of HRV indices in MS, conducted under PRISMA guidelines across PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science. The included studies were grouped into four categories based on the methods used to induce MS: mechanical stimulus, real trip, visual stimulus, and virtual reality. Aggregated findings indicate that frequency–domain metrics, particularly the low frequency (LF)/high frequency (HF) ratio, HF power, and mean heart rate (mHR), are most frequently reported in relation to MS. Overall, autonomic dysregulation likely contributes to MS susceptibility, but standardized protocols are needed to validate HRV as a reliable marker.