Martin Andreas

Prof. Dr. Martin Andreas

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2020 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ULUri Landes
Uri Landes
JWJohn G. Webb
John G. Webb
OBOle De Backer
Ole De Backer
LSLars Sondergaard
Lars Sondergaard
MAMohamed Abdel-Wahab
Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
MBMarco Barbanti
Marco Barbanti

24 April 2023 in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GTGilbert H.L. Tang
Gilbert H.L. Tang
SZSyed Zaid
Syed Zaid
NKNeal S. Kleiman
Neal S. Kleiman
SGSachin S. Goel
Sachin S. Goel
SFShinichi Fukuhara
Shinichi Fukuhara
JSJanarthanan Sathananthan
Janarthanan Sathananthan

14 December 2023 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMartin Andreas
Martin Andreas
HBHaran Burri
Haran Burri
Fabien PrazFabien Praz
Fabien Praz
OSOsama Soliman
Osama Soliman
LBLuigi Badano
Luigi Badano
CLChristophe Leclercq
Christophe Leclercq
The role of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-related tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is increasingly recognized as an independent clinical entity. Hence, interventional TR treatment options continuously evolve, surgical risk assessment and peri-operative care improve the management of CIED-related TR, and the role of lead extraction is of high interest. Furthermore, novel surgical and interventional tricuspid valve treatment options are increasingly applied to patients suffering from TR associated with or related to CIEDs. This multidisciplinary review article developed with electrophysiologists, interventional cardiologists, imaging specialists, and cardiac surgeons aims to give an overview of the mechanisms of disease, diagnostics, and proposes treatment algorithms of patients suffering from TR associated with CIED lead(s) or leadless pacemakers.

20 February 2020 in European Journal of Heart Failure
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CNChristian Nitsche
Christian Nitsche
SAStefan Aschauer
Stefan Aschauer
AKAndreas A. Kammerlander
Andreas A. Kammerlander
MSMatthias Schneider
Matthias Schneider
Thomas PoschnerThomas Poschner
Thomas Poschner
JMJulia Mascherbauer
Julia Mascherbauer
Aims Concomitant cardiac amyloidosis (CA) in severe aortic stenosis (AS) is difficult to recognize, since both conditions are associated with concentric left ventricular thickening. We aimed to assess type, frequency, screening parameters, and prognostic implications of CA in AS. Methods and results A total of 191 consecutive AS patients (81.2 ± 7.4 years; 50.3% female) scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) were prospectively enrolled. Overall, 81.7% underwent complete assessment including echocardiography with strain analysis, electrocardiography (ECG), cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), 99mTc‐DPD scintigraphy, serum and urine free light chain measurement, and myocardial biopsy in immunoglobulin light chain (AL)‐CA. Voltage/mass ratio (VMR; Sokolow–Lyon index on ECG/left ventricular mass index) and stroke volume index (SVi) were tested as screening parameters. Receiver operating characteristic curve, binary logistic regression, and Kaplan–Meier curve analyses were performed. CA was found in 8.4% of patients (n = 16); 15 had transthyretin (TTR)‐CA and one AL‐CA. While global longitudinal strain by echo did not reliably differentiate AS from CA‐AS [area under the curve (AUC) 0.643], VMR as well as SVi showed good discriminative power (AUC 0.770 and 0.773, respectively), which was comparable to extracellular volume by CMR (AUC 0.756). Also, VMR and SVi were independently associated with CA by multivariate logistic regression analysis (P = 0.016 and P = 0.027, respectively). CA did not significantly affect survival 15.3 ± 7.9 months after TAVR (P = 0.972). Conclusion Both TTR‐ and AL‐CA can accompany severe AS. Parameters solely based on ECG and echocardiography allow for the identification of the majority of CA‐AS. In the present cohort, CA did not significantly worsen prognosis 15.3 months after TAVR.

28 October 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMarkus Mach
Markus Mach
SOSercan Okutucu
Sercan Okutucu
TKTillmann Kerbel
Tillmann Kerbel
AAAref Arjomand
Aref Arjomand
SFSefik Gorkem Fatihoglu
Sefik Gorkem Fatihoglu
MAMartin Andreas
Martin Andreas
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has replaced surgical aortic valve replacement as the new gold standard in elderly patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. However, alongside this novel approach, new complications emerged that require swift diagnosis and adequate management. Vascular access marks the first step in a TAVR procedure. There are several possible access sites available for TAVR, including the transfemoral approach as well as transaxillary/subclavian, transcarotid, transapical, and transcaval. Most cases are primarily performed through a transfemoral approach, while other access routes are mainly conducted in patients not suitable for transfemoral TAVR. As vascular access is achieved primarily by large bore sheaths, vascular complications are one of the major concerns during TAVR. With rising numbers of TAVR being performed, the focus on prevention and successful management of vascular complications will be of paramount importance to lower morbidity and mortality of the procedures. Herein, we aimed to review the most common vascular complications associated with TAVR and summarize their diagnosis, management, and prevention of vascular complications in TAVR.

1 May 2017 in Circulation: Heart Failure
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MAMartin Andreas
Martin Andreas
RMRoxana Moayedifar
Roxana Moayedifar
GWGeorg Wieselthaler
Georg Wieselthaler
MWMichael Wolzt
Michael Wolzt
JRJulia Riebandt
Julia Riebandt
DZDaniel Zimpfer
Daniel Zimpfer
Background—: Left ventricular assist device–supported patients are usually anticoagulated with a combination of aspirin and vitamin K antagonists. Long-term vitamin K antagonist therapy can be complicated by unstable international normalized ratio values and patient-related compliance problems. Therefore, direct thrombin inhibitors may represent an alternative to vitamin K antagonists. Methods and Results—: Thirty HeartWare ventricular assist device patients with stable renal function were planned for this prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center study. Patients were randomized to receive either phenprocoumon or dabigatran in addition to aspirin for long-term anticoagulation. Treatment duration was scheduled for 1 year and stopped after observation of a primary end point. Dabigatran dose was 110 and 75 mg BID in patients with normal or impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate >80 mL/min or between 80 and 30 mL/min, respectively). The study was stopped prematurely for safety reasons after 16 patients (61±8 years, 1 female) were randomized. Thromboembolic events occurred in 4 subjects receiving dabigatran (50%) and in 1 receiving phenprocoumon (13%; P =0.28). No major bleeding was recorded, and no patient died during the study. Median time to treatment termination was significantly shorter in dabigatran patients (8.5 versus 12.0 months; P =0.015). Conclusions—: Thromboembolic events on dabigatran led to early termination of a randomized controlled trial of dabigatran versus phenprocoumon in left ventricular assist device patients. Clinical Trial Registration—: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02872649.