Background: The clinical significance of combinations of inflammatory biomarkers in severe COVID-19 infection is yet to be proved. Although several studies have evaluated the prognostic value of biomarkers in patients with COVID-19, there are limited data regarding the value of the combination scores that could take full advantage of the prognostic value of several biomarkers and that could account for the heterogeneity of patients with severe COVID-19. We investigated the prognostic value of combination scores of admission values of inflammatory biomarkers in adults with severe COVID-19. Methods: Adults admitted to the Department of Respiratory Medicine of the UHL with severe COVID-19 (April-September 2021, NCT05145751) were included. Demographics, medical history, laboratory tests and outcome (high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or death) were recorded. The optimal cut-off points of on admission values of C-reactive protein (CRP), CRP to lymphocyte ratio (CLR), lymphocyte to neutrophil ratio (LNR) and derived variation of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dv-NLR (neutrophil/white blood count-lymphocyte)) for the predetermined outcome were defined. Based on the cut-off of CRP, LNR, dv-NLR and CLR, which were found to be predictors for HFNC, 3 scores were defined: CRP and LNR (C-CRP #1), CRP and dv-NLR (C-CRP #2), CRP and CLR (C-CRP #3). Likewise, based on the cut-off of CRP and CLR, which were found to be predictors for death, the score of CRP and CLR (C-CRP #3*) was defined. The combination scores were then classified as: 2 points (both biomarkers elevated); 1 point (one biomarker elevated) and 0 points (normal values). None of the biomarkers was predictive for the ICU admission, so no further analysis was performed. Binomial logistic regression analysis was used to establish the predictive role for each biomarker. Results: One hundred and fifteen patients (60% males, mean age 57.7 years) were included. Thirty-seven (32.2%) patients required HFNC, nine (7.8%) died and eight (7%) were admitted to ICU, respectively. As far as HFNC is concerned, the cut-off point was 3.2 for CRP, 0.231 for LNR, 0.90 for dv-NLR and 0.004 for CLR. Two points of C-CRP #1 and 2 points of C-CRP #3 predicted HFNC with a probability as high as 0.625 (p = 0.005) and 0.561 (p < 0.001), respectively. Moreover, 1 point of C-CRP #2 and 2 points of C-CRP #2 predicted HFNC with a probability of 0.333 and 0.562, respectively. For death, the optimal cut-off point for CRP was 1.11 and for CLR 3.2*1033. Two points of C-CRP #3* with an accuracy of 0.922 predicted mortality (p = 0.0038) in severe COVID-19. Conclusions: The combination scores of CRP and inflammatory biomarkers, based on admission values, are promising predictors for respiratory support using HFNC and for mortality in patients suffering from severe COVID-19 infection.

Rationale: Hematological malignancies have always been a challenge for scientists because there is a constant need to better define these entities. Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal hematopoietic disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis. Cytogenetics and molecular findings are a prerequisite for these syndromes as they confirm the clonal nature of the disease. However, MDS is often linked to autoimmunity and inflammation as part of its pathogenesis. Recently, VEXAS syndrome (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) linked these two in a single mutation, suggesting that the heterogeneity among hematological malignancies often demands a more personalized medicine by tailoring medical treatment to the individual characteristics of each patient. Patient concerns: We present a case of VEXAS syndrome regarding a 63-year-old male patient who initially presented with episodes of low fever, polyarthritis of the knees and ankles, polymyalgia, and fatigue. His laboratory examinations revealed increased levels of serum inflammatory markers. Diagnoses: Diagnosis was based on high clinical suspicion, laboratory findings, and vacuolization of the erythroid and myeloid precursors in the bone marrow evaluation. Mutational status of ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 1 gene was positive with a 68.8% allelomorph frequency (rs782416867). Interventions: Therapy was based on controlling inflammation with the use of glucocorticoids and treating MDS-related anemia with the use of erythropoietin. Outcomes: Currently, the patient visits our department regularly. He is still receiving the aforementioned treatment. He did not mention any new incidents for the time being. Lessons: VEXAS syndrome as a newly identified entity might be often underestimated since its clinical presentation is notably diverse.

Background/Objectives: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of the aorta may trigger an inflammatory response that affects coagulation. In the EVAR of para-renal and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms, the implants are more complex and the duration of surgery is longer. However, the exact pathophysiological mechanisms of coagulation activation are not yet well understood. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the effects of complex EVAR of para-renal and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms on the coagulation status of patients. Methods: This prospective observational study (STROBE), approved and registered by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Larissa (UHL) (NCT06432387), will enroll consecutive patients undergoing elective EVAR of para-renal and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms. Exclusion criteria: Refusal to participate, previous surgery within 3 months, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS) > 3, known history of thrombophilia or functional platelet dysfunction. Perioperative laboratory tests will be performed according to institutional guidelines. These include a complete blood count, conventional coagulation tests, and kidney and liver function tests. In addition, the following parameters will be determined: von Willebrand factor, factors VIII and XI, D-dimers, fibrinogen, Adamts-13, anti-Xa, platelet activation (multiplate), and high-sensitivity troponin. Blood samples will be taken pre-operatively before induction of anesthesia (01), on postoperative day 1 (02), and on postoperative day 3–4 (03). During hospitalization, myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS), major adverse cardiovascular events after non-cardiac surgery (MACE), acute kidney injury (AKI), post-implantation syndrome (PIS), and death from any cause will be recorded. In addition, our patients will be reviewed at 30 days, 3, 6, and 12 months for MACE, implant failure, or death from any cause. All enrolled patients will be treated by the same medical team at UHL according to the indications. According to our power analysis, for a cohort of patients with three consecutive measurements, 58 patients should be included in the study. To compensate for possible dropouts, the sample size was increased to 65 patients. Conclusions: The results of the present study could help physicians to better understand the effects of complex EVAR of para-renal and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms on blood coagulation and platelet activation.

Background and Objectives: Venous thromboembolic disease (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and imposes a substantial financial burden on health systems due to both the direct and indirect costs of acute management and long-term complications. This systematic review aimed to assess patient satisfaction with anticoagulation therapy for VTE and to highlight potential differences according to the type of anticoagulant. The review focused on factors influencing the patient experience, such as perceived efficacy, ease of use, adverse effects, and health-related quality of life. Materials and Methods: A systematic review, without quantitative meta-analysis, was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Articles were identified through searches in major databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and others) using keywords including “patient satisfaction”, “anticoagulation”, “venous thromboembolic disease”, and “quality of life”. In total, 21 studies published between 2009 and 2025 met the inclusion criteria. The studies assessed patient satisfaction with different types of anticoagulation, including vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) injections. Results: Across the included studies, patients generally reported higher levels of treatment satisfaction with DOACs compared with VKAs, mainly due to the absence of routine laboratory monitoring and fewer dietary restrictions. However, satisfaction varied according to age, sex, and clinical status. In specific patient populations, such as those with cancer-associated thrombosis, factors including fewer drug–drug interactions and perceptions of safety with LMWH appeared to influence treatment choice and satisfaction. Adverse effects, particularly bleeding, were identified as major drivers of dissatisfaction. Several studies suggested that higher treatment satisfaction was associated with better adherence, while quality of life appeared to improve in patients treated with DOACs in comparison with VKAs. Conclusions: Patient satisfaction is a critical component of successful VTE management. Overall, DOACs appear to be associated with higher treatment satisfaction than traditional therapies such as VKAs, although further high-quality research is needed to individualise anticoagulation strategies. Systematic incorporation of patient-reported satisfaction into clinical decision-making and into international guidelines may improve adherence, enhance quality of life, and ultimately increase the effectiveness of anticoagulation therapy.

Both primary and secondary hemostasis consist of finely regulated pathways, forming a blood clot to stop bleeding. These orchestrated mechanisms involve multiple plasma- and platelet/endothelial-derived receptors, factors, enzymes, and proteins, such as the von Willebrand factor (vWF), fibrinogen, and thrombin. Over-activation or improper resolution of the coagulation cascade leads to severe pathological disorders, arterial and venous. Despite the fact that the genetic etiology of thrombophilia has gained the main research interest, there is growing evidence that the disturbed redox network of key hemostatic pathways signals thrombus formation. Oxidized LDL in dyslipidemias and many endogenous and exogenous compounds act as pro-oxidant stimuli that lead to post-translational modifications of proteins, such as sulfenylation, nitrosation, disulfide formation, glutathionylation, etc. Oxidation of cysteine and methionine residues of vWF, fibrinogen, and thrombomodulin has been detected at thrombotic episodes. Increased homocysteine levels due to, but not restricted to, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene (MTHFR) mutations have been incriminated as a causative factor for oxidative stress, leading to a pro-thrombotic phenotype. Alterations in the vascular architecture, impaired vascular relaxation through decreased bioavailability of NO, accumulation of Nε-homocysteinylated proteins, ER stress, and endothelial cells’ apoptosis are among the pro-oxidant mechanisms of homocysteine. This review article focuses on describing key concepts on the oxidant-based molecular pathways that contribute to thrombotic episodes, with emphasis on the endogenous compound, homocysteine, aiming to promote further molecular, clinical, and pharmacological research in this field.