Jennifer M. Standley

Jennifer M. Standley

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 May 2023 in Environmental DNA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LBLeigh Boardman
Leigh Boardman
JMJosé A. P. Marcelino
José A. P. Marcelino
RVRafael E. Valentin
Rafael E. Valentin
HBHumberto Boncristiani
Humberto Boncristiani
JSJennifer M. Standley
Jennifer M. Standley
Jamie EllisJamie Ellis
Jamie Ellis
Pests and pathogens are a continuous threat to the health of Western honey bee Apis mellifera L. Monitoring honey bee colonies for arthropod pests, disease‐causing bacteria and fungi, and early detection of new invasions is essential to maintain the pollination services provided by honey bees. We investigated the feasibility of using eDNA metabarcoding to detect pests and pathogens in bee hives and across their foraging environment. We sampled 13 sources for eDNA within and outside hives from our test apiary to determine where the most informative eDNA could be obtained, with most sources sampled thrice. This resulted in 61 samples, 20 negative controls, and three positive controls. Furthermore, we compared two eDNA collection techniques—wiping surfaces with moistened forensic swabs and using a spray/wash technique that aggregated surface eDNA into a container, before collecting the eDNA on a filter. We used DNA metabarcoding with universal primer sets to target arthropod, bacterial, and fungal communities. Our results showed that most sources yielded sufficient eDNA and that results of the swab and spray/wash methods were similar when they could be applied to the same surface. We detected DNA from honey bee bacterial symbionts, mycotoxin‐producing fungi and Brachymyrmex sp. rover ants. Common pests and pathogens of concern to honey bees (i.e., [small hive beetle (Aethina tumida), Varroa destructor, and Melissococcus plutonius]) were detected. This matched our visual observations of clinical signs of these pests and pathogens in the hives we tested. DNA from some species was source specific, which has implications for using eDNA as a monitoring tool. Collectively, our data show that eDNA metabarcoding can accurately detect DNA from arthropods and microbes honey bees contact and can be used as a comprehensive molecular predictor tool for colony health surveys.

24 June 2024 in Journal of Apicultural Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJennifer M. Standley
Jennifer M. Standley
CPCody Prouty
Cody Prouty
Jamie EllisJamie Ellis
Jamie Ellis

27 February 2025 in Molecular Ecology Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJennifer M. Standley
Jennifer M. Standley
JMJosé A. P. Marcelino
José A. P. Marcelino
FYFahong Yu
Fahong Yu
JEJames D. Ellis
James D. Ellis

27 February 2025 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RORabiu Olatinwo
Rabiu Olatinwo
MBMohammad Bataineh
Mohammad Bataineh
JSJennifer M. Standley
Jennifer M. Standley
AAAnthony Paul Abbate
Anthony Paul Abbate
GWGeoffrey R. Williams
Geoffrey R. Williams
PLPierre Lau
Pierre Lau
DNA analysis of environmental samples (eDNA) provides a non-intrusive approach to identify organisms, characterize biological communities, and assess biodiversity, including the detection and monitoring of invasive plant effects. However, the use of eDNA for specific applications, such as targeted-species detection, geographic and floral source tracing, and assessment of invasive plant ecological and environmental effects, requires the development of species-specific genetic primers. Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera (L.) Small) is a non-native high-impact invader, capable of changing fire regimes, native biodiversity, nutrient cycling, and wildlife habitat and populations, that is expanding in range and abundance throughout the southern United States. In this study, we investigated and identified specific genetic sites, markers, in the tallow chloroplast genome and developed sets of primers for tallow eDNA detection. Two sets of tallow primers were developed, tallow-specific primers and tallow-related primers. Both sets of primers can be used for tallow eDNA detection, with higher target specificity for tallow-specific primers. Primers were subsequently validated for target specificity against closely related species, samples of tallow tissue, and honey and honey bee-collected pollen from areas with tallow. We found that tallow-specific primers differentiated tallow eDNA from closely related species, demonstrating target specificity. Furthermore, a sequence analysis of the tallow-related primers in the polymerase chain reaction accurately distinguished members of the Hippomaninae subtribe, including tallow, from other subtribe or subfamily members within the Euphorbiaceae. Ultimately, the genetic markers and the corresponding sets of primers will facilitate eDNA analysis of tallow for several applications, including detection and monitoring in water and soil, assurance of honey quality and floral source tracing, and perhaps serving as a model for determining plant use by pollinators.

30 January 2019 in Biological Research For Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ALAnne D. Letocha
Anne D. Letocha
DSDebra L. Schutte
Debra L. Schutte
JSJennifer M. Standley
Jennifer M. Standley
ELElizabeth J. Leslie
Elizabeth J. Leslie
BZBridget Zimmerman
Bridget Zimmerman
AMAnn Marie McCarthy
Ann Marie McCarthy
Objective: We examined genomic variation potentially associated with the cortisol stress response in children having a painful medical procedure. Design: Children 4–10 years old having a peripheral intravenous line inserted provided saliva samples for evaluation of the cortisol response as a biological measure of distress: two on the day of the procedure and two at home on a nonstressful day for comparison values. Children and biological parents also provided samples for genotyping of variants with known or suspected association with the cortisol stress response. Analysis included child-only association and family-based transmission disequilibrium tests (TDTs). Results: Genotype and phenotype data on the cortisol stress response were available from 326 children for child-only association analyses and 376 complete family trios for TDTs. Children were 50% female, an average of 7.5 years old, and mostly (83%) White/non-Hispanic. We identified four single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) potentially associated with the cortisol stress response: rs1176744 ( HTR3B), rs10062367 ( CRHBP), rs634479 ( OPRM1), and rs8030107 ( NTRK3). Family-based analysis identified a two-SNP haplotype in HTR1B suggestive for association with the cortisol response (rs6296, rs11568817). Allelic TDTs identified rs7897947 ( NFKB2) as potentially related to cortisol response. Conclusions: Findings provide preliminary evidence for genes potentially important in cortisol response to an acute stressor in children in the serotonin, dopamine, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor pathways, the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, and the inflammatory response. Combined with analyses of related phenotypes and clinical data, these results could help identify patients at increased risk of adverse responses to painful medical procedures who might benefit from tailored interventions.

28 September 2026 in Apidologie
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJennifer M. Standley
Jennifer M. Standley
AAAnthony Paul Abbate
Anthony Paul Abbate
PLPierre Lau
Pierre Lau
GTGiovanni Tundo
Giovanni Tundo
GWGeoffrey R. Williams
Geoffrey R. Williams