Jamie Ellis

Prof. Jamie Ellis

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 January 2019 in Insects
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NONancy Ostiguy
Nancy Ostiguy
Francis DrummondFrancis Drummond
Francis Drummond
KAKate Aronstein
Kate Aronstein
BEBrian Eitzer
Brian Eitzer
Jamie EllisJamie Ellis
Jamie Ellis
WSWalter S. Sheppard
Walter S. Sheppard
Pollinators, including honey bees, are responsible for the successful reproduction of more than 87% of flowering plant species: they are thus vital to ecosystem health and agricultural services world-wide. To investigate honey bee exposure to pesticides, 168 pollen samples and 142 wax comb samples were collected from colonies within six stationary apiaries in six U.S. states. These samples were analyzed for evidence of pesticides. Samples were taken bi-weekly when each colony was active. Each apiary included thirty colonies, of which five randomly chosen colonies in each apiary were sampled for pollen. The pollen samples were separately pooled by apiary. There were a total of 714 detections in the collected pollen and 1008 detections in collected wax. A total of 91 different compounds were detected: of these, 79 different pesticides and metabolites were observed in the pollen and 56 were observed in the wax. In all years, insecticides were detected more frequently than were fungicides or herbicides: one third of the detected pesticides were found only in pollen. The mean (standard deviation (SD)) number of detections per pooled pollen sample varied by location from 1.1 (1.1) to 8.7 (2.1). Ten different modes of action were found across all four years and nine additional modes of action occurred in only one year. If synergy in toxicological response is a function of simultaneous occurrence of multiple distinct modes of action, then a high frequency of potential synergies was found in pollen and wax-comb samples. Because only pooled pollen samples were obtained from each apiary, and these from only five colonies per apiary per year, more data are needed to adequately evaluate the differences in pesticide exposure risk to honey bees among colonies in the same apiary and by year and location.

24 July 2017 in Pest Management Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PDPingli Dai
Pingli Dai
CJCameron J Jack
Cameron J Jack
AMAshley N Mortensen
Ashley N Mortensen
Jamie EllisJamie Ellis
Jamie Ellis

4 September 2018 in Pest Management Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PDPingli Dai
Pingli Dai
CJCameron J. Jack
Cameron J. Jack
AMAshley N. Mortensen
Ashley N. Mortensen
TBTomas A Bustamante
Tomas A Bustamante
JBJeffrey R. Bloomquist
Jeffrey R. Bloomquist
Jamie EllisJamie Ellis
Jamie Ellis

24 August 2016 in Journal of Economic Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JCJoshua Campbell
Joshua Campbell
ACAna R. Cabrera
Ana R. Cabrera
CSCory Stanley-Stahr
Cory Stanley-Stahr
Jamie EllisJamie Ellis
Jamie Ellis
Flupyradifurone (Sivanto) is a novel systemic insecticide from the butenolide class developed by Bayer. Based on available data (USEPA [2014][1]), this insecticide appears to have a favorable safety profile for honey bee colonies. As a result, the label permits the product to be applied during prebloom and bloom in various crops, including citrus, except when mixed with azole fungicides during the blooming period. We placed 24 honey bee ( Apis mellifera L.) colonies adjacent to eight flowering buckwheat ( Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) fields that either had been sprayed with the maximum label rate of flupyradifurone or with water only (control fields), with three colonies placed adjacent to each field. We conducted colony strength assessments during which the number of adult bees, eggs, uncapped brood cells, capped brood cells, food storage cells, and weights of honey supers and brood chambers were determined prior to, during, and after the flowering period. We also analyzed bee-collected pollen and nectar for flupyradifurone residues. Overall, there were no differences in any colony strength parameter for colonies placed at control and flupyradifurone-treated buckwheat fields. Residue analyses showed that pollen ( x = 565.8 ppb) and nectar ( x = 259.4 ppb) gathered by bees on fields treated with flupyradifurone contained significantly higher flupyradifurone residues than did bee bread and unprocessed nectar collected by bees from control fields (75% of samples <LOD). Within the conditions set forth by our experimental design, our collective data suggest no adverse effects of flupyradifurone on honey bee colonies when following label directions. [1]: #ref-29

4 April 2018 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PDPingli Dai
Pingli Dai
CJCameron J. Jack
Cameron J. Jack
AMAshley N. Mortensen
Ashley N. Mortensen
TBTomas A. Bustamante
Tomas A. Bustamante
Jamie EllisJamie Ellis
Jamie Ellis
The effects of chronic exposure to common acaricides on Apis mellifera survival, developmental rate and larval weight were tested in the laboratory. Larvae were reared in vitro and fed a diet containing amitraz: 1.5, 11, 25 and 46 mg/L; coumaphos: 1.8, 6, 8 and 25 mg/L; or fluvalinate: 0.1, 1, 2.4 and 6 mg/L. The dependent variables were compared for groups feeding on treated diets and control diets: positive control, 45 mg/L dimethoate; solvent control; and negative control. Bee survival decreased in the 46 mg/L amitraz and 25 mg/L coumaphos treatments but not in any fluvalinate treatment. Furthermore, the developmental rate decreased in individuals treated with 46 mg/L amitraz. In our study, larvae exposed to acaricides at concentrations similar to maximum residue in pollen and honey/nectar had no detectable change in survival or developmental rate. Given that pollen and honey/nectar represent only a small part of larval diet, we suggest that residues of amitraz, coumaphos and fluvalinate at the levels we tested are unlikely to impact immature worker bee survival in the field, though our data do not preclude any sublethal effects that may result from bee exposure to these compounds or possible synergisms when they co-occur in bee colonies.

18 December 2021 in Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAlfonso Allen‐Perkins
Alfonso Allen‐Perkins
AMAinhoa Magrach
Ainhoa Magrach
MDMatteo Dainese
Matteo Dainese
LGLucas Alejandro Garibaldi
Lucas Alejandro Garibaldi
DKDavid Kleijn
David Kleijn
IBIgnasi Bartomeus
Ignasi Bartomeus
Seventy five percent of the world's food crops benefit from insect pollination. Hence, there has been increased interest in how global change drivers impact this critical ecosystem service. Because standardized data on crop pollination are rarely available, we are limited in our capacity to understand the variation in pollination benefits to crop yield, as well as to anticipate changes in this service, develop predictions, and inform management actions. Here, we present CropPol, a dynamic, open, and global database on crop pollination. It contains measurements recorded from 202 crop studies, covering 3,394 field observations, 2,552 yield measurements (i.e., berry mass, number of fruits, and fruit density [kg/ha], among others), and 47,752 insect records from 48 commercial crops distributed around the globe. CropPol comprises 32 of the 87 leading global crops and commodities that are pollinator dependent. Malus domestica is the most represented crop (32 studies), followed by Brassica napus (22 studies), Vaccinium corymbosum (13 studies), and Citrullus lanatus (12 studies). The most abundant pollinator guilds recorded are honey bees (34.22% counts), bumblebees (19.19%), flies other than Syrphidae and Bombyliidae (13.18%), other wild bees (13.13%), beetles (10.97%), Syrphidae (4.87%), and Bombyliidae (0.05%). Locations comprise 34 countries distributed among Europe (76 studies), North America (60), Latin America and the Caribbean (29), Asia (20), Oceania (10), and Africa (7). Sampling spans three decades and is concentrated on 2001–2005 (21 studies), 2006–2010 (40), 2011–2015 (88), and 2016–2020 (50). This is the most comprehensive open global data set on measurements of crop flower visitors, crop pollinators and pollination to date, and we encourage researchers to add more datasets to this database in the future. This data set is released for non‐commercial use only. Credits should be given to this paper (i.e., proper citation), and the products generated with this database should be shared under the same license terms (CC BY‐NC‐SA).