Nitin Kumar Singh

Dr. Nitin Kumar Singh

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 April 2026 in Pathology - Research and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NSNitin Kumar Singh
Nitin Kumar Singh
FAFIROZ AHMAD
FIROZ AHMAD
ADIL HUSAINADIL HUSAIN
ADIL HUSAIN


27 July 2026 in Molecular Biology Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NSNitin Kumar Singh
Nitin Kumar Singh
KMKush Meera
Kush Meera
MSManinder Singh
Maninder Singh
FAFIROZ AHMAD
FIROZ AHMAD
ADIL HUSAINADIL HUSAIN
ADIL HUSAIN
SMSiddhartha Kumar Mishra
Siddhartha Kumar Mishra

10 June 2026 in Discover Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NSNitin Kumar Singh
Nitin Kumar Singh
MSManinder Singh
Maninder Singh
ADIL HUSAINADIL HUSAIN
ADIL HUSAIN
LALina I. Alnajjar
Lina I. Alnajjar
FAFIROZ AHMAD
FIROZ AHMAD
VGVarsha Gupta
Varsha Gupta
Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most lethal malignancies, characterised by aggressive progression, metabolic adaptation, and resistance to therapy. Ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of regulated cell death driven by lipid peroxidation, has emerged as a critical mechanism influencing tumour survival and therapeutic response. However, the role of ferroptosis suppressor genes (FSGs) in pancreatic cancer remains incompletely understood. In this study, FSGs were systematically retrieved from FerrDb V2 and subjected to multi-step filtering to identify a curated set of 196 protein-coding genes. Genomic alteration analysis using cBioPortal across 21 pancreatic cancer studies (n = 5189 samples) identified seven recurrently altered genes (TP53, HSF1, PARP10, ZFP36, SIRT2, ECH1, and ENPP2) with alteration frequencies ≥ 3%. Co-occurrence analysis revealed predominantly cooperative alteration patterns among these genes, suggesting functional complementarity. Survival analysis demonstrated that alterations in FSGs were significantly associated with reduced overall survival in pancreatic cancer, with several genes (ECH1, ZFP36, SIRT2, and ENPP2) showing particularly strong adverse prognostic effects. In contrast, no significant survival associations were observed in oesophageal and gastric cancers, indicating a tumour-specific dependency on ferroptosis-related mechanisms. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the broader FSG set revealed significant involvement in pathways related to metabolic regulation (AMPK-mTOR signalling), autophagy, hypoxia response (HIF-1 signalling), and oncogenic signalling (PI3K-Akt pathway). Integration of these findings suggests that ferroptosis suppressor genes contribute to pancreatic cancer progression by promoting metabolic adaptation and resistance to oxidative stress. In conclusion, this study identifies key ferroptosis suppressor genes with prognostic relevance in pancreatic cancer and highlights their integration within critical metabolic and stress-response pathways. The tumour-specific nature of these associations underscores the importance of biological context and supports the potential of FSGs as prognostic biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in ferroptosis-based strategies.

30 April 2026 in The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SAShad Ahmad
Shad Ahmad
ADIL HUSAINADIL HUSAIN
ADIL HUSAIN
NSNitin Kumar Singh
Nitin Kumar Singh
FAFIROZ AHMAD
FIROZ AHMAD
Introduction: Brain disorders, including Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, and psychiatric illnesses, continue to pose substantial clinical and societal burdens. Traditional treatment approaches are often limited by poor targeting efficiency and the complexity of neural networks. Neuroengineering combines principles of engineering, materials science, and neuroscience to develop innovative tools capable of monitoring and modulating brain activity. Advances in neural interfaces, neurostimulation technologies, and bioengineered therapeutic systems are enabling more precise and minimally invasive treatment strategies, offering new possibilities for restoring neurological function and improving patient outcomes. Short summary: Brain disorders represent one of the greatest challenges in modern medicine, demanding innovative approaches that integrate neuroscience, engineering, and technology. Neuroengineering has emerged as a transformative discipline that bridges these domains, offering new strategies for diagnosis, monitoring, and therapeutic intervention. This review discusses recent advances in neuroengineering technologies, including neural interfaces, neurostimulation systems, nanotechnology-based therapeutics, and tissue engineering approaches supported by artificial intelligence for precision brain disorder management. Conclusion: Neuroengineering represents a rapidly evolving field with the potential to transform brain healthcare through innovative diagnostic and therapeutic technologies. Continued interdisciplinary collaboration and technological refinement are essential to overcome translational challenges and achieve widespread clinical implementation.

20 May 2026 in Biological Trace Element Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSShikha Singh
Shikha Singh
NSNitin Kumar Singh
Nitin Kumar Singh
NDNalini Dwivedi
Nalini Dwivedi
DKDinesh Kumar
Dinesh Kumar
SPSeema Paroha
Seema Paroha
VGVarsha Gupta
Varsha Gupta