Neospora caninum is a protozoan parasite, reported as a leading cause of cattle abortions and reproductive failure worldwide, costing the cattle industry approximately $1.3 billion annually. With wild pig (Sus scrofa) populations estimated at over six million in the United States, contact between wild pigs and livestock is inevitable, mainly because of the widespread geographic co-occurrence of the two species. As a known reservoir for numerous fungal, bacterial, viral and parasitic diseases, wild pigs are of particular importance for human and veterinary health relative to the prevention of infectious diseases. The seroprevalence of N. caninum in wild pig populations was previously documented in the United States, raising the question as to their exposure point of prevalence. This research screened 116 individual wild pigs for N. caninum using a variety of available assays. Using two different commercially available ELISA test kits, seroprevalence ranged from 12.5% to 67.8%. The Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Test resulted in our highest percent seroprevalence for these samples, at 84.1%. However, none of our samples showed any presence of N. caninum or associated pathologies via histological evaluation of representative tissues. Importantly, the assays used in this study were not congruent with all duplicate samples or between the test types used. The implications of these non-congruent results demonstrates that currently available testing assays produce variable results, underscoring the need for more reliable testing kits and a standardized methodology when assessing disease prevalence in wildlife, particularly for N. caninum in wild pigs, which impacts prevalence and comparability across studies.

Objective: Recognition and reporting of vector-borne and zoonotic disease (VBZD) cases is largely dependent upon the consideration of such diseases by healthcare practitioners during the initial diagnosis and ordering of specific confirmative diagnostic tests. This study was conducted to assess the general knowledge and understanding of VBZD transmission and clinical presentation. Methods:...

During the last 20 years, there has been increasing concern about inefficient vector control efforts due to insecticide resistance. A common mechanism causing insecticide resistance is mutational changes in the voltage-gated sodium channel, deemed knockdown resistance (kdr), resulting from continued pyrethroid application. Although closely related, there have been documented kdr differences and frequencies between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Individual Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus from five counties in Texas, USA were tested using four single nucleotide polymorphisms genotyping assays to assess the kdr (F1534C, V1016I, V410L, and S989P) differences between the two species. Each mutation was analyzed independently by calculating frequencies and analyzing the difference using a Wilcox Rank Sum test. Significant differences were observed between Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus when comparing F1534C and V410L (p-value < 0.0001). Knockdown resistant mutation V1016I was not different between the two species. Individuals from both species had di-locus mutations, and individuals from Ae. aegypti had tri-locus mutations detected in combinations that have been reported to influence insecticide resistance. Given our findings, one can speculate that populations of both species are resistant to pyrethroids, thus likely limiting the success of control methods.