Hannah S. Tiffin

Dr. Hannah S. Tiffin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HTHannah S. Tiffin
Hannah S. Tiffin
EREdwin George Rajotte
Edwin George Rajotte
JSJoyce M. Sakamoto
Joyce M. Sakamoto
Erika MachtingerErika Machtinger
Erika Machtinger
Ticks are able to transmit the highest number of pathogen species of any blood-feeding arthropod and represent a growing threat to public health and agricultural systems worldwide. While there are numerous and varied causes and effects of changes to tick-borne disease (re)emergence, three primary challenges to tick control were identified in this review from a U.S. borders perspective. (1) Climate change is implicated in current and future alterations to geographic ranges and population densities of tick species, pathogens they can transmit, and their host and reservoir species, as highlighted by Ixodes scapularis and its expansion across southern Canada. (2) Modern technological advances have created an increasingly interconnected world, contributing to an increase in invasive tick species introductions through the increased speed and frequency of trade and travel. The introduction of the invasive Haemaphysalis longicornis in the eastern U.S. exemplifies the challenges with control in a highly interconnected world. (3) Lastly, while not a new challenge, differences in disease surveillance, control, and management strategies in bordering countries remains a critical challenge in managing ticks and tick-borne diseases. International inter-agency collaborations along the U.S.–Mexico border have been critical in control and mitigation of cattle fever ticks (Rhipicephalus spp.) and highlight the need for continued collaboration and research into integrated tick management strategies. These case studies were used to identify challenges and opportunities for tick control and mitigation efforts through a One Health framework.

12 November 2019 in Insects
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HTHannah S. Tiffin
Hannah S. Tiffin
SPSteven Peper
Steven Peper
AWAlexander N. Wilson-Fallon
Alexander N. Wilson-Fallon
KHKatelyn M. Haydett
Katelyn M. Haydett
GCGuofeng Cao
Guofeng Cao
Steven M PresleySteven M Presley
Steven M Presley
The recent emergence or reemergence of various vector-borne diseases makes the knowledge of disease vectors’ presence and distribution of paramount concern for protecting national human and animal health. While several studies have modeled Aedes aegypti or Aedes albopictus distributions in the past five years, studies at a large scale can miss the complexities that contribute to a species’ distribution. Many localities in the United States have lacked or had sporadic surveillance conducted for these two species. To address these gaps in the current knowledge of Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus distributions in the United States, surveillance was focused on areas in Texas at the margins of their known ranges and in localities that had little or no surveillance conducted in the past. This information was used with a global database of occurrence records to create a predictive model of these two species’ distributions in the United States. Additionally, the surveillance data from Texas was used to determine the influence of new data from the margins of a species’ known range on predicted species’ suitability maps. This information is critical in determining where to focus resources for the future and continued surveillance for these two species of medical concern.

11 October 2021 in International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HTHannah S. Tiffin
Hannah S. Tiffin
MSMichael J. Skvarla
Michael J. Skvarla
EMErika T. Machtinger
Erika T. Machtinger
Tick abundance and diagnosed cases of tick-borne diseases have been increasing in the United States. American black bear (Ursus americanus) populations have also been increasing in the eastern United States. As a competent host of several species of ticks and a mammal capable of traveling long distances, the role of black bears as hosts for ticks requires further evaluation. Ectoparasite surveys were conducted on black bears in Pennsylvania to evaluate tick presence, abundance, spatial distribution, and association with Sarcoptes scabiei, the etiological agent of sarcoptic mange, on bears to better understand their role in tick ecology and to improve on-host surveillance techniques. Tick burden was evaluated using standard area sampling (10.16 × 10.16 cm squares) on pre-designated body regions on black bears from June 2018–December 2019. In total, 278 unique individual black bears were evaluated, with all ticks identified as Ixodes scapularis (n = 1976; 76.7% adults, 23.3% immatures). Tick presence differed by body region on bears, with the highest percentage of tick observations located on bear ears and muzzle. Ticks also partitioned on black bears by life-stage, with immature ticks primarily recorded on the lower extremities of bears and adult ticks primarily recorded on the front-quarters of bears. This includes the first known record of I. scapularis larvae parasitizing black bears, and observations of all three mobile life-stages concurrently parasitizing bears. Tick abundance was also statistically significant dependent on season, with the highest abundance of ticks recorded in spring and lowest abundance in fall. Adult ticks were less likely to be present on bears with mange. These data reveal the important role black bears may serve in tick ecology and dispersal as all three mobile life-stages of I. scapularis were found parasitizing a mammal capable of traveling far distances in a region with high numbers of Lyme disease cases.

25 August 2021 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KHKatelyn M. Haydett
Katelyn M. Haydett
SPSteven Peper
Steven Peper
CWCynthia Reinoso Webb
Cynthia Reinoso Webb
HTHannah S. Tiffin
Hannah S. Tiffin
AWAlexander N. Wilson-Fallon
Alexander N. Wilson-Fallon
Steven M PresleySteven M Presley
Steven M Presley
Neospora caninum is a protozoan parasite, reported as a leading cause of cattle abortions and reproductive failure worldwide, costing the cattle industry approximately $1.3 billion annually. With wild pig (Sus scrofa) populations estimated at over six million in the United States, contact between wild pigs and livestock is inevitable, mainly because of the widespread geographic co-occurrence of the two species. As a known reservoir for numerous fungal, bacterial, viral and parasitic diseases, wild pigs are of particular importance for human and veterinary health relative to the prevention of infectious diseases. The seroprevalence of N. caninum in wild pig populations was previously documented in the United States, raising the question as to their exposure point of prevalence. This research screened 116 individual wild pigs for N. caninum using a variety of available assays. Using two different commercially available ELISA test kits, seroprevalence ranged from 12.5% to 67.8%. The Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Test resulted in our highest percent seroprevalence for these samples, at 84.1%. However, none of our samples showed any presence of N. caninum or associated pathologies via histological evaluation of representative tissues. Importantly, the assays used in this study were not congruent with all duplicate samples or between the test types used. The implications of these non-congruent results demonstrates that currently available testing assays produce variable results, underscoring the need for more reliable testing kits and a standardized methodology when assessing disease prevalence in wildlife, particularly for N. caninum in wild pigs, which impacts prevalence and comparability across studies.

1 April 2024 in Journal of Wildlife Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HTHannah S. Tiffin
Hannah S. Tiffin
JBJustin D. Brown
Justin D. Brown
MTMark Ternent
Mark Ternent
BSBrandon Snavely
Brandon Snavely
ECEmily Carrollo
Emily Carrollo
EMErika T. Machtinger
Erika T. Machtinger
The parasitic mite Sarcoptes scabiei causes mange in nearly 150 species of mammals by burrowing under the skin, triggering hypersensitivity responses that can alter animals' behavior and result in extreme weight loss, secondary infections, and even death. Since the 1990s, sarcoptic mange has increased in incidence and geographic distribution in Pennsylvania black bear (Ursus americanus) populations, including expansion into other states. Recovery from mange in free-ranging wildlife has rarely been evaluated. Following the Pennsylvania Game Commission's standard operating procedures at the time of the study, treatment consisted of one subcutaneous injection of ivermectin. To evaluate black bear survival and recovery from mange, from 2018 to 2020 we fitted 61 bears, including 43 with mange, with GPS collars to track their movements and recovery. Bears were collared in triplicates according to sex and habitat, consisting of one bear without mange (healthy control), one scabietic bear treated with ivermectin when collared, and one untreated scabietic bear. Bears were reevaluated for signs of mange during annual den visits, if recaptured during the study period, and after mortality events. Disease status and recovery from mange was determined based on outward gross appearance and presence of S. scabiei mites from skin scrapes. Of the 36 scabietic bears with known recovery status, 81% fully recovered regardless of treatment, with 88% recovered with treatment and 74% recovered without treatment. All bears with no, low, or moderate mite burdens (<16 mites on skin scrapes) fully recovered from mange (n=20), and nearly half of bears with severe mite burden (≥16 mites) fully recovered (n=5, 42%). However, nonrecovered status did not indicate mortality, and mange-related mortality was infrequent. Most bears were able to recover from mange irrespective of treatment, potentially indicating a need for reevaluation of the mange wildlife management paradigm.

10 April 2025 in International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HTHannah S. Tiffin
Hannah S. Tiffin
Justin BrownJustin Brown
Justin Brown
KKKathleen Kelly
Kathleen Kelly
KWKyle Van Why
Kyle Van Why
MTMark Ternent
Mark Ternent
Erika MachtingerErika Machtinger
Erika Machtinger
Sarcoptic mange, caused by Sarcoptes scabiei, is a pan-emerging zoonotic disease, affecting new species and expanding into novel geographic locations in recent decades yet the distinct differences in disease syndromes between species remain poorly characterized and understood. This study investigated mange severity, mite burden, and immune response as characterized by dermapathology in sympatric carnivoran species in Pennsylvania, USA, assessing black bears (Ursus americanus), coyotes (Canis latrans), grey foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), and red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Scabietic and healthy individuals were evaluated using standardized metrics to assess health parameters between infested and healthy individuals and differences in mange disease syndromes between species. Mange severity varied significantly by species. Red foxes and black bears displayed more severe outward signs of mange infestation and higher mite burdens compared to coyotes, which exhibited milder physical and histologic signs of disease. Histologic analyses revealed significant differences in dermatologic lesions; black bears and red foxes more frequently had severe hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, and secondary bacterial and yeast colonization, while coyotes had fewer and milder lesions. In terms of mite detection, tissue digestions were the most sensitive method, followed by cytology and histology. Serological screening detected the highest S. scabiei exposure rates in coyotes (53 %), followed by black bears (37 %), red foxes (17 %), and grey foxes (12 %). Notably, many seropositive coyotes showed no physical signs of mange, suggesting potential resistance or recovery. In contrast, red foxes exhibited severe disease and low seroprevalence, consistent with high mortality and limited recovery. These findings highlight species-specific differences in sarcoptic mange manifestation and host responses. Coyotes may act as reservoirs, contributing to disease persistence in the ecosystem, while red foxes and black bears suffer higher morbidity. This study emphasizes the need for integrated diagnostic and surveillance approaches to improve understanding of S. scabiei epidemiology and inform wildlife management strategies.