Background: Cardiovascular risk assessment relies heavily on coronary calcium scoring. With an emphasis on varying slice increments, this study investigates the effectiveness of true and virtual non-contrast reconstructions on photon-counting CT. Reconstruction methods’ effects on calcium severity classifications are critical to the improvement in imaging techniques. Methods: This study comprised 77 participants (mean age: 63 ± 10 years, 43% female), of whom 0 had a coronary artery calcium score (CACS) of zero. In contrast to true non-contrast (TNC) 3 × 3 mm, the reconstructions included TNC 3 × 1.5 mm, virtual non-contrast (VNC) 3 × 3 mm, and VNC 3 × 1.5 mm. Agatston units served as the basis for classifications into standard clinical diagnostic categories. Results: High concordance between acquisition types was revealed by interclass correlation values (0.97–0.99). Comparing TNC 3 × 1.5 mm reconstructions to their VNC counterparts, misclassifications were less common (Cohen Kappa = 0.94). (K = 0.83–0.85). Significant differences in the average calcium scores and rates of misclassification highlighted the impact of reconstruction methods on precise evaluations. Conclusions: VNC methods demonstrated high agreement; however, with a small rate of misclassifications as compared to the gold standard method. VNC CACS may help optimize workflows but may need differing cutoffs as compared to traditional methods.

Background/Objectives: Aortic valve calcification is commonly evaluated using 3.0 mm true non-contrast (TNC) computed tomography (CT) images. This study evaluates the reproducibility of virtual non-contrast (VNC) reconstructions at different slice intervals using photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT). Methods: In this retrospective study, we included 279 consecutive patients, who underwent PCD-CT for evaluation of native aortic valve between February 2023 and December 2023 with both TNC and VNC images at 3.0 and 1.5 mm slice intervals. Aortic valve calcium score (AVCS) and aortic valve calcium volume (AVCV) were compared between the two methods using paired t-tests. Agreement for continuous variables was assessed using inter-class coefficients (ICCs). Cohen’s Kappa (κ) was calculated to evaluate the agreement between different modalities in diagnosing severe AV calcification. Results: Compared to the standard, TNC images at 1.5 mm intervals showed higher AVCS (mean difference: −290 ± 418, p < 0.001), with high reproducibility between techniques (CS: ICC 0.969, [IQR 0.962, 0.975]). Compared with reference, VNC showed no significant differences in AVCS at either slice intervals, with excellent reproducibility (3.0 mm, ICC 0.970 [0.963, 0.976]; 1.5 mm, ICC 0.971 [0.964, 0.977]). Compared to TNC 3.0 mm, strong concordance was observed using other reconstruction techniques in assessing severe AV calcification (κ = 0.81 [95% CI: 0.74–0.88], 0.83 [95% CI: 0.76–0.90], and 0.83 [95% CI: 0.76–0.90] for TNC at 1.5 mm, VNC at 3.0 mm, and 1.5 mm, respectively), with low misclassification rates. Conclusions: Our study highlights high reproducibility in the evaluation of AVCS by VNC reconstruction at 3.0 and 1.5 mm intervals compared with reference offering a reliable alternative with an excellent diagnostic accuracy.

T1 mapping and extracellular volume (ECV) calculations in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) have the potential to identify early fibrosis that is not yet visible using late gadolinium enhancement; however, the need for same-day blood draws due to the temporal variations in hematocrit (Hct) limits the use of ECV. We aimed to determine the reproducibility of synthetic Hct and ECV using different published models among groups of subjects. Healthy subjects and those with diagnosed cardiac amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) scanned using a 1.5T scanner with native and post-contrast T1 maps and same-day Hct were included. Among 148 subjects, there was excellent reproducibility (all ICCs ~0.98) between synthetic and measured ECV across the six formulas, despite only modest reproducibility of synthetic/measured Hct (ICCs 0.52–0.66). The levels of accuracy predicting abnormal measured ECV were consistently excellent among the different synthetic ECV models. The difference in the CMR vendor used to generate models did not seem to affect the results of the comparisons. We conclude that synthetic ECV yielded excellent reproducibility compared with ECV calculated using measured hematocrit, possibly obviating the need for blood extraction in cardiac MRI settings without point-of-care Hct.