Gang Lian

Dr. Gang Lian


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 March 2025 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLingyu Li
Lingyu Li
CHChenxia Hu
Chenxia Hu
AWAlan L. Wright
Alan L. Wright
GLGang Lian
Gang Lian
LZLijun Zhou
Lijun Zhou
JYJing Yang
Jing Yang
As a key facilitator of agricultural technology diffusion, the development and implementation of agricultural standards significantly shape future agricultural technology innovation. This study analyzes China’s agricultural economic development from 2004 to 2019. It integrates agricultural standard stocks and patent stocks into a Cobb–Douglas production function. Patents serve as a proxy for technological progress, reflecting innovation capacity, while standards represent the institutionalization and diffusion of technological advancements. The analysis focuses on the average annual growth rates of agricultural capital, labor, patents, and standards to clarify their respective contributions to agricultural development. The results show that capital contributes 19.951%, though constrained by inefficiencies. Labor accounts for 38.779% but shows negative elasticity (−0.403%), reflecting the decline of rural labor and the need for mechanization. Patents contribute the most at 42.021%, though limited by weak technology diffusion. Agricultural standards contribute 5.323%, with their impact restricted by adoption barriers. The findings highlight the growing role of technological innovation in agriculture. Strengthening standardization systems and promoting broader adoption of agricultural standards are key to advancing sustainable agricultural development in China.

29 April 2026 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XMXiaoxuan Ma
Xiaoxuan Ma
QGQinghai Guo
Qinghai Guo
GLGang Lian
Gang Lian
QSQiaohui Shen
Qiaohui Shen
As a major source of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, the low-carbon retrofitting of existing buildings can help to alleviate climate pressures and increase environmental resilience, and it is an effective and feasible way to achieve the goal of sustainable development. However, the majority of existing urban renewal research focuses on analyzing influencing factors, carbon reduction potential, carbon reduction measures, and the cost-effectiveness of carbon reduction. There is a lack of systematic review and synthesis of theoretical and technological research in carbon reduction and retrofitting. Using the systematic literature review method following the PRISMA protocol, we screened 244 peer-reviewed articles at the title/abstract level and conducted an in-depth analysis of 77 studies that met the PICOS-based inclusion criteria. This review summarizes the evolution of low-carbon retrofit technologies for existing buildings over the past five decades, and identifies climate change pressures, policies and regulations, stakeholder demand, and technological innovation as the primary drivers for decarbonizing existing buildings. These drivers, which are also influenced by technological capabilities, retrofit markets, and inherent building characteristics, drive both building decarbonization and broader SDGs such as climate mitigation. Focusing on the drivers of decarbonization, technological development, and retrofit benefits in retrofitting existing buildings, this review presents an inventory-based technical pathway framework. We identified key issues in the decarbonization and retrofitting of buildings and developed this framework to guide decarbonization and retrofitting practices. The framework can provide tech-driven retrofit guidance for researchers, policymakers, and administrators.