The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts’ recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.

Background.: Renal insufficiency can occur in patients with congenital lower urinary tract malformations (LUTM) even when managed during infancy. Data in the current literature concerning this subject remain sparse. The aim of this study was to report the feasibility and long-term results of renal transplantation during adulthood in patients with a congenital LUTM. Methods.: A retrospective multicenter study from 3 French renal transplant centers was conducted, including 123 transplantations on 112 patients with LUTM (1996–2016). Graft survival, patient survival, and complications were analyzed. Results were stratified according to the underlying uropathy and the type of initial management during childhood or before transplantation. Results.: In this study, patients suffering from posterior urethral valves (n = 49), spina bifida (n = 21), central neurogenic bladder (n = 13), bladder exstrophy (n = 14), prune belly syndrome (n = 12), Hinman syndrome (n = 6), urogenital sinus (n = 4), and other pathologies (n = 4) were included. The mean age at transplantation was 32.1 years old (±11.2). The mean follow-up period was 7.2 years. Patient survival at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years was 97.4%, 93.0%, 89.4%, and 80.0%, respectively. Graft survival at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years was 96.6%, 87.6%, 77.3%, 60.6%, and 36.4%, respectively. Enterocystoplasty and continent urinary diversions exposed grafts to more frequent acute pyelonephritis (P = 0.02). There was no difference in graft survival when transplantation was performed on an enterocystoplasty or urinary diversions compared with a native bladder, provided a well-conducted bladder management. Conclusions.: Even though enterocystoplasty and continent urinary diversions exposed grafts to more frequent acute graft pyelonephritis, patient and graft survival rates in LUTM at 10 years were similar to other kidney transplantations on native bladders.

Maintaining organ viability between donation and transplantation is of critical importance for optimal graft function and survival. To date in pancreas transplantation, static cold storage (SCS) is the most widely practiced method of organ preservation. The first experiments in ex vivo perfusion of the pancreas were performed at the beginning of the 20th century. These perfusions led to organ oedema, hemorrhage, and venous congestion after revascularization. Despite these early hurdles, a number of factors now favor the use of perfusion during preservation: the encouraging results of HMP in kidney transplantation, the development of new perfusion solutions, and the development of organ perfusion machines for the lung, heart, kidneys and liver. This has led to a resurgence of research in machine perfusion for whole organ pancreas preservation. This review highlights the ischemia-reperfusion injuries assessment during ex vivo pancreas perfusion, both for assessment in pre-clinical experimental models as well for future use in the clinic. We evaluated perfusion dynamics, oedema assessment, especially by impedance analysis and MRI, whole organ oxygen consumption, tissue oxygen tension, metabolite concentrations in tissue and perfusate, mitochondrial respiration, cell death, especially by histology, total cell free DNA, caspase activation, and exocrine and endocrine assessment.

The standard technique for pancreas preservation for transplantation is Static Cold Storage (SCS). In this experimental study, we compare SCS to Hypothermic Machine Perfusion (HMP) of the pancreas to assess if the latter could safely prolong the ischaemia period prior to transplantation. We worked in 2 phases, first with organ preservation for 24hours and second, preservation for either 2 or 6hours before allotransplantation. In phase 1, exocrine injury markers were found to be non‐significantly lower, in the HMP group (n=3) versus SCS (n=3) after 24hours of preservation; amylase (p=0.2), lipase (p=0.3) and lactate dehydrogenase (p=0.1). In phase 2, 14 recipient diabetic pigs (after total pancreatectomy) received allotransplantations with n=4 and n=4 pancreases after HMP for 2 and 6hours versus n=3 and n=3 pancreases after SCS for 2 and 6hours respectively. There were no differences in recipient survival (p=0.7), mean survival was 14 days (0‐53 days). All recipients had allograft function defined as detectable C‐peptide and independent normoglycemia. We have not highlighted vascular thrombosis in all allotransplantations. This study reports the first successful pancreas allotransplantation after HMP preservation for up to 6 hours with no evidence of graft thrombosis.

Organ transplantation remains the treatment of last resort in case of failure of a vital organ (lung, liver, heart, intestine) or non-vital organ (essentially the kidney and pancreas) for which supplementary treatments exist. It remains the best alternative both in terms of quality-of-life and life expectancy for patients and of public health expenditure. Unfortunately, organ shortage remains a widespread issue, as on average only about 25% of patients waiting for an organ are transplanted each year. This situation has led to the consideration of recent donor populations (deceased by brain death with extended criteria or deceased after circulatory arrest). These organs are sensitive to the conditions of conservation during the ischemia phase, which have an impact on the graft’s short- and long-term fate. This evolution necessitates a more adapted management of organ donation and the optimization of preservation conditions. In this general review, the different aspects of preservation will be considered. Initially done by hypothermia with the help of specific solutions, preservation is evolving with oxygenated perfusion, in hypothermia or normothermia, aiming at maintaining tissue metabolism. Preservation time is also becoming a unique evaluation window to predict organ quality, allowing repair and/or optimization of recipient choice.