Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness, with challenges persisting in early diagnosis, disease progression, and surgical outcome prediction. Recent advances in artificial intelligence have enabled significant progress by extracting clinically relevant patterns from structural, functional, and molecular data. This review outlines the current applications of artificial intelligence in glaucoma care, including early detection using fundus photography and OCT and disease progression prediction using deep learning architectures such as convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, transformer models, generative adversarial networks, and autoencoders. Surgical outcome forecasting has been enhanced through multimodal models that integrate electronic health records and imaging data. We also highlight emerging AI applications in omics analysis, including transcriptomics and metabolomics, for biomarker discovery and individualized risk stratification. Despite these advances, key challenges remain in interpretability, integration of heterogeneous data, and the lack of personalized surgical timing guidance. Future work should focus on transparent, generalizable, and multimodal AI models, supported by large, well-curated datasets, to advance precision medicine in glaucoma.

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the visual, anatomical, and safety outcomes of the intravitreal faricimab, a novel vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) bispecific agent, in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients. The follow-up times in the included studies ranged from a minimum of 36 weeks to a maximum of 52 weeks. EMBASE, Ovid-Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Scopus, the WHO ICTRP, ClinicalTrial.gov, the EU Clinical Trials Register, and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) were searched (The last literature search was performed on August 17, 2023) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing faricimab with control groups for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). The risk of bias for eligible RCTs was independently assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool by two authors (W.-T.Y. and C.-S.W.). The meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4 software. The mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), total choroidal neovascularization (CNV) area, and total lesion leakage were analyzed as continuous variables and the outcome measurements were reported as the weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The ocular adverse events and ocular serious adverse events were analyzed as dichotomous variables and the outcome measurements were analyzed as the odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% CI. Random-effects model was used in our study for all outcome synthesizing due to different clinical characteristics. Four RCTs with 1,486 patients were eligible for quantitative analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between intravitreal faricimab and anti-VEGF in BCVA [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.47; 95% CI: (− 0.17, 1.11)]. The intravitreal faricimab group showed numerically lower CST [WMD = − 5.96; 95% CI = (− 7.11, − 4.82)], total CNV area [WMD = − 0.49; 95% CI = (− 0.68, − 0.30)], and total lesion leakage [WMD = − 0.88; 95% CI = (− 1.08, − 0.69)] after intravitreal therapy compared with the intravitreal anti-VEGF group. There were no statistically significant differences between intravitreal faricimab and anti-VEGF in ocular adverse events (AEs) [pooled odds ratio (OR) = 1.10; 95% CI = (0.81, 1.49)] and serious adverse events (SAEs) [pooled OR = 0.84; 95% CI = (0.37, 1.90)]. The intravitreal bispecific anti-VEGF/angiopoietin 2 (Ang2) antibody faricimab with a extended injection interval was non-inferior to first-line anti-VEGF agents in BCVA. It was safe and had better anatomical recovery. Large, well-designed RCTs are needed to explore the potential benefit of extended faricimab for nAMD. This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42022327450).

Purpose: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a major cause of childhood blindness, and selecting the optimal treatment between anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (anti‐VEGF) and laser therapy is crucial. Understanding their impact on key outcomes, particularly mortality, is essential for informed clinical decision‐making. Methods: A systematic literature search identified published studies comparing anti‐VEGF and laser therapy for ROP up to December 31, 2024. Primary outcomes included mortality, retinal detachment, surgical interventions, myopia and neurodevelopmental outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and ROBINS‐I. Data were synthesized using a random‐effects model, with risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). This review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024585336). Results: A total of 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 58 observational studies, covering 10 516 infants, were included. Anti‐VEGF therapy was associated with a higher mortality risk than laser therapy (RR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.23–2.30), primarily in observational studies (1.85; 1.32–2.60), while RCTs showed no significant difference (1.02; 0.46–2.26). Anti‐VEGF therapy was linked to lower risks of retinal detachment (0.36; 0.27–0.50), fewer surgical interventions (0.38; 0.22–0.65), and a lower risk of myopia (0.67; 0.54–0.82). No significant differences were found in neurodevelopmental outcomes (1.05; 0.96–1.15). Conclusions: Anti‐VEGF therapy offers benefits over laser treatment, including reduced retinal detachment, fewer surgeries and lower myopia risk, with no observed increase in mortality or neurodevelopmental impairment. Future large‐scale RCTs are needed to clarify mortality risks while minimising the impact of confounding factors.

Glaucoma, a chronic and progressive eye disease, is a significant public health concern responsible for a substantial proportion of global vision impairment and blindness

Aims To compare the refractive and visual outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted astigmatic keratotomy (FSAK) and toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for correcting astigmatism in cataract patients. Methods Studies were retrieved from the Ovid-Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus which compared FSAK and toric IOL for astigmatism correction in cataract patients. Outcome measures included postoperative refractive cylinder, correction index, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), the proportion of patients achieving a residual refractive cylinder of 1.00 dioptre or less, target-induced astigmatism (TIA) and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA). The trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to collect firm evidence supporting our conclusion. Results 9 studies encompassing 590 participants were analysed. The meta-analysis revealed that toric IOLs could result in less postoperative refractive cylinder and provide better UDVA compared with FSAK. The TSA disclosed strong evidence of lower postoperative refractive cylinder in the toric IOL group compared with that of the FSAK group. FSAK showed a smaller correction index and lower mean TIA and SIA compared with toric IOLs. Conclusions For cataract patients, both FSAK and toric IOLs are effective methods for correcting astigmatism. However, toric IOLs offer less postoperative astigmatism and result in better postoperative UDVA compared with FSAK. In vector analysis of astigmatism, toric IOLs can also produce higher TIA and SIA. Additionally, neither method is associated with severe untreatable complications. Therefore, the conclusion is that toric IOLs are the preferred choice for astigmatism correction in cataract patients and FSAK serves as a viable alternative when toric IOLs are contraindicated.

Glaucoma continues to be a primary contributor to permanent vision loss worldwide, frequently advancing even when intraocular pressure management is clinically adequate. Accumulating research emphasizes the metabolic susceptibility of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), specifically concerning the progressive depletion of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD⁺), a pivotal coenzyme fundamental to mitochondrial energy production and cellular survival mechanisms. As a key biosynthetic precursor in NAD⁺ synthesis pathways, nicotinamide (NAM), a form of vitamin B3, has exhibited significant neuroprotective properties across various preclinical experimental models and preliminary clinical investigations, demonstrating enhanced preservation of RGC morphology and physiological function. This comprehensive review systematically examines the current body of evidence supporting NAM’s therapeutic utility in glaucomatous neuroprotection, focusing particularly on underlying metabolic pathways, obstacles in clinical translation, and prospective therapeutic applications. Through systematic integration of data from cellular and molecular research, animal experimental studies, and population-based epidemiological investigations, we establish a conceptual framework for repurposing NAM as an innovative complementary therapeutic strategy in comprehensive glaucoma care, addressing key considerations for future clinical development including optimal dosing strategies, delivery mechanisms, and patient selection criteria for maximizing therapeutic outcomes in this challenging neurodegenerative condition.