Aleksandra Łoś

Ms. Aleksandra Łoś

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2021 in Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AŁAleksandra Łoś
Aleksandra Łoś
PSPiotr Skorka
Piotr Skorka
Aneta StracheckaAneta Strachecka
Aneta Strachecka
MBMikolaj Boranski
Mikolaj Boranski
DTDariusz Teper
Dariusz Teper

9 May 2018 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AŁAleksandra Łoś
Aleksandra Łoś
Aneta StracheckaAneta Strachecka
Aneta Strachecka
Using insect hemolymph (“blood”) and insect body surface elutions, researchers can perform rapid and cheap biochemical analyses to determine the insect’s immunology status. The authors of this publication describe a detailed methodology for a quick marking of the concentration of total proteins and evaluation of the proteolytic system activity (acid, neutral, and alkaline proteases and protease inhibitors), as well as a methodology for quick “liver” tests in insects: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and urea and glucose concentration analyses. The meaning and examples of an interpretation of the results of the presented methodology for biochemical parameter determination are described for the example of honey bees.

24 August 2021 in Journal of Apicultural Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AŁAleksandra Łoś
Aleksandra Łoś
MSMichał Schulz
Michał Schulz
PSPiotr Skorka
Piotr Skorka
This review gathers the majority of foregoing information about the red mason bee (Osmia bicornis, syn. rufa) (Apoidea: Megachilidae) and elaborates on the following issues: taxonomy and morphology, distribution, reproduction and sex ratios, nesting, life cycle, and daily activity, metabolic changes, accompanying organisms (including parasites), flower preferences and pollination, and breeding. To make forthcoming studies about O. bicornis bees more comprehensive, the authors also identified knowledge gaps.

17 August 2020 in Insects
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMałgorzata Bieńkowska
Małgorzata Bieńkowska
AŁAleksandra Łoś
Aleksandra Łoś
PWPaweł Węgrzynowicz
Paweł Węgrzynowicz
We conducted a survey on honey bee (Apis mellifera) queen management. Data were collected every year from 1980 to 2018. In total, 2964 questionnaires were collected from all over Poland. We examined the trends by decade timeslot, apiary size, and geographical location. Regardless of the decade and the size of the apiary, on average, above 90% of Polish beekeepers replace old queens with new ones in their colonies. In general, during the observed period, beekeepers replaced almost 52% of their queens, 21% of which were purchased. In the last decade, there was an upward trend in the percentage of beekeepers replacing queens throughout the country. The involvement of purchased queens in colony management is associated with the size of the apiary, and it significantly grows with the number of colonies in the apiary. The percentage of purchased queens went up in all the voivodeships over time. Research and education in this area are needed in order to track the trends and further improve Polish beekeepers’ practices.

1 March 2020 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AŁAleksandra Łoś
Aleksandra Łoś
PSPiotr Skorka
Piotr Skorka
Aneta StracheckaAneta Strachecka
Aneta Strachecka
SWStanisław Winiarczyk
Stanisław Winiarczyk
ŁAŁukasz Adaszek
Łukasz Adaszek
DWDariusz Wolski
Dariusz Wolski

11 July 2021 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMałgorzata Bieńkowska
Małgorzata Bieńkowska
AŁAleksandra Łoś
Aleksandra Łoś
PWPaweł Węgrzynowicz
Paweł Węgrzynowicz
RMRobert Maciorowski
Robert Maciorowski
Socio-cultural research might address anthropocentric reasons for honeybee (Apis mellifera) conservation. In some regions, particular honeybee subspecies are considered to be native; A. mellifera mellifera (“dark bee”) in the north-east and A. mellifera carnica in the Island Beskids in Poland. Additionally, A. mellifera caucasia (often incorrectly called A. mellifera caucasica) and Buckfast are reported across Poland. In order to verify the actual choice of beekeepers, a survey on honeybee subspecies kept in apiaries was conducted annually from 1980 to 2018. This is a way to verify if conservation management towards the dark bee influenced its maintenance at a sufficient level for their restoration. The analysis revealed that Polish beekeepers know what is “buzzing” in their hives, and the awareness of which subspecies/types of honeybee they maintain has grown through the years. Initially, they kept up to four different subspecies per apiary, but now most have only one (maximum of two). Currently, Polish apiaries approach a homogeneous share with the exclusive presence of A. mellifera carnica subspecies. The popularity of indigenous A. mellifera mellifera has declined over time and is low now. It seems that new solutions should be considered to increase the effectiveness of dark European bee conservation management efforts.