This study examines the impact of alcohol blends on the performance and emissions of aviation micro-turbojet engines. Thus, propanol, butanol, pentanol, hexanol, heptanol, and octanol were tested at 10%, 20%, and 30% concentrations and mixed with Jet A, as well as with an additional 5% heptanol blend to preserve base fuel properties, to fuel a JetCat P80 micro-turbojet. Physicochemical properties such as density, viscosity, and elemental composition were analyzed before engine testing. Carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions from 1 kg of fuel combustion varied, with propanol yielding the lowest at 3.02 kg CO₂ per kg of fuel and octanol yielding the highest at 3.22 kg CO₂ per kg of fuel. The following results were obtained: alcohol blends lowered exhaust gas temperature by up to 7.5% at idle and intermediate thrust but slightly increased it at maximum power; fuel mass flow increased with alcohol concentration, peaking at 20.4% above Jet A for 30% propanol; and thrust varied from −4.92% to +7.4%. While specific fuel consumption increased by up to 12.8% for propanol, thermal efficiency declined by 1.8–5.6% and combustion efficiency remained within ±2% of Jet A. Butanol and octanol emerged as viable alternatives, balancing emissions reduction and efficiency. The results emphasize the need for an optimal trade-off between environmental impact and engine performance.

This paper investigates how octanol, used as a renewable additive in Jet A fuel, influences the performance and emissions of aviation micro-turbo engines. Blends containing 10%, 20%, and 30% octanol, with an additional 5% n-heptane, were tested to closely replicate Jet A’s physical–chemical properties. Mathematical models validated using density and viscosity data achieved accurate predictions, with maximum absolute errors of 0.0018 g/cm³ for density and 0.4020 mm²/s for viscosity. Performance assessments showed that fuel consumption increased due to octanol’s lower calorific value, requiring higher fuel flow to sustain engine speed. Combustion temperature variations ranged from a decrease of 5.38% in Regime 1 (30% octanol) to increases of up to 1.47% and 1.13% in Regimes 2 and 3, respectively, without compromising engine stability. Thrust variations were minimal, with decreases up to 0.72% observed at 30% octanol concentration. Emission analysis indicated significant reductions in CO and NO_x levels with increased octanol content, attributed to enhanced combustion completeness and additional oxygen availability. SO₂ emissions also decreased slightly due to the lower sulfur content. Thermal efficiency marginally declined from 5.04% (Jet A) to approximately 4.92–4.97% for octanol blends. These findings support octanol as a viable sustainable additive, offering substantial emission benefits with only minor efficiency trade-offs.