Melis Gultekin

Dr. Melis Gultekin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 October 2013 in Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GYGozde Yazici
Gozde Yazici
TSTolga Yusuf Sanlı
Tolga Yusuf Sanlı
MCMustafa Cengiz
Mustafa Cengiz
DYDeniz Yuce
Deniz Yuce
MGMelis Gultekin
Melis Gultekin
GOGokhan Ozyigit
Gokhan Ozyigit
Background: This study aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes and fatal carotid blow out syndrome (CBOS) incidence rates between two different stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) protocols. Methods: The study included 75 patients with inoperable locally recurrent head and neck cancer treated with SBRT in our department between June 2007 and March 2011. The first 43 patients were treated sequentially (group I). Then our SBRT protocol was changed due to the high rate of CBOS, and the following 32 patients were treated every other day in a prospective institutional protocol (group II). Results: Median overall survival in group I and group II was 11 months and 23 months, respectively (P = 0.006). We observed 11 cases of CBOS. Only 1 of 7 patients (14%) with CBOS survived in group I, whereas 2 of 4 patients (50%) in group II remain alive. CBOS free median overall survivals were 9 months, and 23 months in group I and group II respectively (P = 0.002). The median radiation dose received by the carotid artery in patients with CBOS was 36.5 Gy (range: 34–42.8 Gy), versus 34.7 Gy (range: 0–44 Gy) in the patients that didn’t have CBOS (P = 0.15). CBOS did not occur in any of the patients with a maximum carotid artery radiation dose <34 Gy. Conclusions: Every other day SBRT protocol for re-irradiation of recurrent head and neck cancer is promising in terms of decreasing the incidence of fatal CBOS.

1 January 2019 in Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
COCem Onal
Cem Onal
SSSezin Yuce Sari
Sezin Yuce Sari
BYBerna Akkus Yildirim
Berna Akkus Yildirim
GYGuler Yavas
Guler Yavas
MGMelis Gultekin
Melis Gultekin
FYFerah Yildiz
Ferah Yildiz
Onal C, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Aug;30:e28. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e28

2 November 2011 in Head & Neck
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMelis Gultekin
Melis Gultekin
EOEnis Ozyar
Enis Ozyar
MCMustafa Cengiz
Mustafa Cengiz
GOGokhan Ozyigit
Gokhan Ozyigit
MHMutlu Hayran
Mutlu Hayran
FAFadil Akyol
Fadil Akyol

1 February 2014 in Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FZF. Zorlu
F. Zorlu
MGMelis Gultekin
Melis Gultekin
MCM. Cengiz
M. Cengiz
FYF. Yildiz
F. Yildiz
FAF. Akyol
F. Akyol
GOGokhan Ozyigit
Gokhan Ozyigit
Chordomas are uncommon neoplasms and there is still controversy regarding establishment of diagnosis and management. The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and toxicity of fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (FSRS) in skull base chordomas. There were 4 female (36%) and 7 male (64%) patients. FSRS was delivered with CyberKnife (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). The median tumor volume was 14.7 cc (range, 3.9–40.5 cc). The median marginal tumor dose was 30 Gy (range, 20–36 Gy) in a median 5 fractions (range, 3–5 fractions). The median follow-up time was 42 months (range, 17–63 months). At the time of analysis, 10 (91%) patients were alive and 1 (9%) had died due to tumor progression. Of 10 patients, 8 (73%) had stable disease and the remaining 2 (18%) had progressive disease. The actuarial overall survival (OS) after FSRS was 91% at two-years. Two patients developed radiation-induced brain necrosis as a complication in the 8th and 28th months of follow-up, respectively. Our results with robotic FSRS in skull base chordomas are promising for selected patients. However, due to the slow growth pattern of skull base chordomas, a longer follow-up is required to determine exact treatment results and late morbidity.

17 May 2021 in Acta Oncologica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
COCem Onal
Cem Onal
SSSezin Yuce Sari
Sezin Yuce Sari
GYGuler Yavas
Guler Yavas
EOEzgi Oymak
Ezgi Oymak
SBSumerya Duru Birgi
Sumerya Duru Birgi
FYFerah Yildiz
Ferah Yildiz
We sought to analyze the toxicity rates and the treatment outcomes in endometrial cancer (EC) patients treated with postoperative three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modu...

8 July 2016 in Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MGMelis Gultekin
Melis Gultekin
MCMustafa Cengiz
Mustafa Cengiz
DSDuygu Sezen
Duygu Sezen
FZFaruk Zorlu
Faruk Zorlu
FYFerah Yildiz
Ferah Yildiz
MGMurat Gurkaynak
Murat Gurkaynak
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for reirradiation of recurrent pediatric tumors. Methods and Materials: The study included 23 pediatric patients who were reirradiated using hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the radiation oncology department between January 2008 and November 2013. In total, 33 tumors were treated—27 (82%) cranial and 6 (18%) extracranial. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy was administered due to recurrent disease in 31 (94%) tumors and residual disease in 2 (6%) tumors. The median total dose was 25 Gy (range: 15-40 Gy), and the median follow-up was 20 months (range: 2-68 months). Results: The 1-year and 2-year local control rates in the entire study population were 42% and 31%, respectively. The median local control time was 11 months (range: 0-54 months) following hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. The patients with tumor response after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy had significantly longer local control than the patients with post-hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy tumor progression (21 vs 3 months, P < .001). Tumor volume <1.58 cm3 was correlated (not significantly) with better local control (23 vs 7 months, P = .064). Conclusion: Reirradiation of pediatric tumors using hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is a safe and effective therapeutic approach. This treatment modality should be considered as a treatment option in selected pediatric patients.