Background : There is limited data on somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression of metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) using modern imaging techniques and stratifying by primary site and tumor grade (G). Understanding patterns of SSTR expression and tumor heterogeneity is essential when determining the relevance of cold and radiolabeled somatostatin analog treatments. Methods: A single-institutional retrospective analysis of metastatic well-differentiated G1-3 GEP-NET patients who underwent Gallium-68 ([⁶⁸Ga])-DOTATATE or Copper-64 ([⁶⁴Cu])-DOTATATE positron emission tomography (PET) imaging from September 2016 to June 2024 was performed. Results: A total of 1192 patients were considered eligible for this study. Among them, 26 (2.2%) were completely negative on SSTR PET/computed tomography (CT), and 27 (2.3%) had weak uptake (less or equal to the normal liver). Up to 40 (3.4%) had heterogeneous SSTR expression on PET/CT: 26 (2.2%) displayed the coexistence of strongly avid lesions with the absence or near absence of SSTR uptake in measurable tumors (heterogeneous strong), while 14 (1.2%) had a combination of absent and weakly expressing SSTR tumors (heterogeneous low). An additional nine cases with prior homogeneous expression (0.8%) developed new SSTR-negative tumors along with disease progression, potentially indicating dedifferentiation. The absent or heterogeneous SSTR expression rates were greater in NET G3 than G1/G2 and in tumors originating outside the small bowel (midgut). Most NETs with absent or heterogeneous SSTR expression were fluorodeoxyglucose-F-18 ([¹⁸F]FDG)-avid. Conclusions: The large majority of metastatic GEP-NETs demonstrate strong and relatively uniform SSTR expression, but approximately 8% are SSTR-negative, weak or heterogeneous on PET/CT. Higher than average rates of absent/heterogeneous/weak SSTR expression occur in G3 NETs and lower rates among small intestine primaries.

Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) represent a rare and varied class of neoplasms, characterized by diverse clinical presentations and prognostic trajectories. Accurate and prompt diagnosis is vital to inform and optimize therapeutic decisions. Ultrasound, including standard B-mode imaging and advanced methods such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), serves as a key component in the diagnostic evaluation of these tumors. B-mode US and CEUS provide non-invasive, accessible methods for early detection and characterization. On B-mode imaging, GEP-NETs typically present as well-defined, hyperechoic, or iso-echoic lesions, while CEUS highlights their characteristic vascularity, marked by arterial-phase hyperenhancement and venous-phase washout. Compared to CT and MRI, ultrasound offers real-time, dynamic imaging without ionizing radiation or nephrotoxic contrast agents, making it particularly advantageous for patients requiring frequent monitoring or with contraindications to other imaging modalities. CT and MRI are widely regarded as the preferred methods for staging and surgical planning due to their detailed anatomical visualization. However, ultrasound, especially CEUS, provides a significant adjunctive role in both early detection and the follow-up on GEP-NETs. This analysis delves into the strengths, challenges, and innovations in ultrasound technology for diagnosing pancreatic NETs, focusing on its contribution to comprehensive imaging strategies and its impact on patient care decisions.

(1) Background: GEP-NETs are frequently diagnosed at advanced stage. For well-differentiated somatostatin receptor-positive (SSTR+) NETs, SSA are the preferred first-line therapy. However, in newly diagnosed patients with G2/G3 and a high tumor burden, SSA alone might not be enough; (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis to assess the effectiveness of combining oxaliplatin–fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy with SSA as an upfront strategy in newly diagnosed metastatic G2/G3 GEP-NET patients treated with oxaliplatin–fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy; (3) Results: Between March 2017 and October 2023, 32 pts (19 males, 13 females; M:F = 1.5:1; median age 54 years, range 31–82) were deemed eligible to receive oxaliplatin–fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy in addition to SSA; 14 received XELOX and 18 FOLFOX. After a median follow-up of 26 mo., each patient had completed at least two cycles of chemotherapy. The ORR was 25%, with a median DoR of 21.3 mo. The DCR was 87.5%. Notably, 28.1% of patients experienced tumor shrinkage sufficient for radical surgery on residual tumor lesions, encompassing both primary tumors and metastases; (4) Conclusions: Upfront treatment with the combination of oxaliplatin–fluoropyrimidine and SSA demonstrated effectiveness and safety. This approach may be considered to facilitate conversion surgery in eligible patients.

Temozolomide (TMZ) and other alkylating agents (ALK) yield high response rates when used in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Several series reported higher response rates when used in tumors with low expression of O6-Methylguanine DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT) with immunohistochemistry or promoter methylation. However, evidence is most consistent in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Variations in MGMT assessment further complicate direct comparisons and clinical application. Thus, the predictive role of MGMT in patients with NETs treated with ALK is still debated. A systematic review of the literature based on PRISMA methodology was performed searching in public medical database. Peer-reviewed full-text English language articles published until April 14th, 2025 were screened. 23 studies out of 649 published articles screened were deemed eligible for the analysis. Overall, these studies enrolled 1826 all-grade NET patients, 1462 of whom treated with TMZ or other ALK-based chemotherapy. The status of MGMT had been tested in 1092 (76.6%) of them with various techniques. The overall response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) were higher in MGMT-deficient compared with MGMT-proficient NETs. Our work suggested that MGMT status may be predictive of ALK efficacy, especially TMZ-based. The high heterogeneity of the studies and of techniques employed should be considered for potential interpretation biases. On this basis the MGMT testing before ALK therapy is not currently recommended as a routine in daily clinical practice.

Introduction: Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide with limited therapeutic options. The aim of this study was to analyze the value of adding surgery to the first-line treatment in patients with oligometastatic GC (OGC).Methods: This retrospective study included patients with OGC who underwent induction chemotherapy followed by surgery of both primary tumor and synchronous metastasis between April 2012 and April 2022. Endpoints were overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic factors were assessed with the Cox model.Results: Data from 39 patients were collected. All cases were referred to our multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) to evaluate the feasibility of radical surgery. After a median follow-up of 33.6 months (mo.), median OS was 26.6 mo. (95% CI 23.8–29.4) and median RFS was 10.6 mo. (95% CI 6.3–14.8). Pathologic response according to the Mandard criteria (TRG 1–3, not reached versus 20.5 mo. for TRG 4–5; HR 0.23, p=0.019), PS ECOG ≤ 1 (26.7 mo. for PS ≤ 1 versus 11.2 mo. for PS >1; HR 0.3, p=0.022) and a low metastatic burden (26.7 mo. for single site versus 12.9 mo. for ≥2 sites; HR 0.34, p=0.039) were related to good prognosis. No major intraoperative complications nor surgery-related deaths occurred in our series.Discussion: A sequential strategy of preoperative chemotherapy and radical surgical excision of both primary tumor and metastases was demonstrated to significantly improve OS and RFS. Multidisciplinary evaluation is mandatory to identify patients who could benefit from this strategy.