Chemotherapy remains a primary treatment for metastatic cancer, with tumor response being the benchmark outcome marker. However, therapeutic response in cancer is unpredictable due to heterogeneity in drug delivery from systemic circulation to solid tumors. In this proof-of-concept study, we evaluated chemotherapy concentration at the tumor-site and its association with therapy response by applying a mathematical model. By using pre-treatment imaging, clinical and biologic variables, and chemotherapy regimen to inform the model, we estimated tumor-site chemotherapy concentration in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases, who received treatment prior to surgical hepatic resection with curative-intent. The differential response to therapy in resected specimens, measured with the gold-standard Tumor Regression Grade (TRG; from 1, complete response to 5, no response) was examined, relative to the model predicted systemic and tumor-site chemotherapy concentrations. We found that the average calculated plasma concentration of the cytotoxic drug was essentially equivalent across patients exhibiting different TRGs, while the estimated tumor-site chemotherapeutic concentration (eTSCC) showed a quadratic decline from TRG = 1 to TRG = 5 (p < 0.001). The eTSCC was significantly lower than the observed plasma concentration and dropped by a factor of ~5 between patients with complete response (TRG = 1) and those with no response (TRG = 5), while the plasma concentration remained stable across TRG groups. TRG variations were driven and predicted by differences in tumor perfusion and eTSCC. If confirmed in carefully planned prospective studies, these findings will form the basis of a paradigm shift in the care of patients with potentially curable colorectal cancer and liver metastases.

Background : There is limited data on somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression of metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) using modern imaging techniques and stratifying by primary site and tumor grade (G). Understanding patterns of SSTR expression and tumor heterogeneity is essential when determining the relevance of cold and radiolabeled somatostatin analog treatments. Methods: A single-institutional retrospective analysis of metastatic well-differentiated G1-3 GEP-NET patients who underwent Gallium-68 ([⁶⁸Ga])-DOTATATE or Copper-64 ([⁶⁴Cu])-DOTATATE positron emission tomography (PET) imaging from September 2016 to June 2024 was performed. Results: A total of 1192 patients were considered eligible for this study. Among them, 26 (2.2%) were completely negative on SSTR PET/computed tomography (CT), and 27 (2.3%) had weak uptake (less or equal to the normal liver). Up to 40 (3.4%) had heterogeneous SSTR expression on PET/CT: 26 (2.2%) displayed the coexistence of strongly avid lesions with the absence or near absence of SSTR uptake in measurable tumors (heterogeneous strong), while 14 (1.2%) had a combination of absent and weakly expressing SSTR tumors (heterogeneous low). An additional nine cases with prior homogeneous expression (0.8%) developed new SSTR-negative tumors along with disease progression, potentially indicating dedifferentiation. The absent or heterogeneous SSTR expression rates were greater in NET G3 than G1/G2 and in tumors originating outside the small bowel (midgut). Most NETs with absent or heterogeneous SSTR expression were fluorodeoxyglucose-F-18 ([¹⁸F]FDG)-avid. Conclusions: The large majority of metastatic GEP-NETs demonstrate strong and relatively uniform SSTR expression, but approximately 8% are SSTR-negative, weak or heterogeneous on PET/CT. Higher than average rates of absent/heterogeneous/weak SSTR expression occur in G3 NETs and lower rates among small intestine primaries.

In myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), somatic mutations occur in five major categories: RNA splicing, DNA methylation, activated cell signaling, myeloid transcription factors, and chromatin modifiers. Although many MDS cases harbor more than one somatic mutation, in general, there is mutual exclusivity of mutated genes within a class. In addition to the prognostic significance of individual somatic mutations, more somatic mutations in MDS have been associated with poor prognosis. Prognostic assessment remains a critical component of the personalization of care for patient with MDS because treatment is highly risk adapted. Multiple methods for risk stratification are available with the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), currently considered the gold standard. Increasing access to myeloid gene panels and greater evidence for the diagnostic and predictive value of somatic mutations will soon make sequencing part of the standard evaluation of patients with MDS. In the absence of formal guidelines for their prognostic use, well-validated mutations can still refine estimates of risk made with the IPSS-R. Not only are somatic gene mutations advantageous in understanding the biology of MDS and prognosis, they also offer potential as biomarkers and targets for the treatment of patients with MDS. Examples include deletion 5q, spliceosome complex gene mutations, and TP53 mutations. KEY POINTS

Caplacizumab prevents platelet adhesion and has been approved for acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP). This study was retrospective, including all patients diagnosed with aTTP and treated with caplacizumab since commercial availability in 2019 until 28 February 2021 at a single academic hospital with no exclusion criteria. Results used definitions for outcomes in aTTP from the International Working Group Consensus. Ten patients with aTTP received caplacizumab. The median age was 52 years. Six (60%) patients had refractory aTTP while 4 (40%) had newly diagnosed aTTP. The median laboratory values prior to therapy demonstrated: platelet count (PC) 29/uL, LDH 518 U/L (182–1850), ADAMTS13 activity 3% and ADAMTS13 inhibitor 1.4 BU. Everyone received glucocorticoids, rituximab, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and caplacizumab. The median number of TPE was 12 days. Caplacizumab was started at a median of 5 days after the first TPE and the median treatment duration was 31 days. Normalization of PC, LDH and ADAMTS13 activity in days were 5, 3.5, and 32.5, respectively. Six (60%) patients achieved complete response, 3 (30%) had refractory disease and 1 (10%) had relapsed aTTP. No subject suffered abnormal bleeding, or thrombotic event. There were no deaths. Caplacizumab with TPE, glucocorticoids and rituximab was a safe and effective therapy for aTTP.

Rationale: Evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (mNETs) who have undergone prior bland hepatic transarterial embolization (TAE). Methods: Retrospective review of mNET patients who received PRRT with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE between 4/2018 and 02/2022 with and without prior TAE. The most recent clinical, imaging, and laboratory findings, including hepatic Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, were compared to pre-PRRT. Results: 171 patients (95 M, 76 F, median age = 66) with mNET of different primary sites (9 foregut, 100 midgut, 9 hindgut, 44 pancreas, 9 unknown) received at least 1 cycle of PRRT with at least 6 months of follow-up, 110 of whom were embolization-naïve and 61 who had prior TAE. The median follow up was 22 months (range: 6–43). Patients with prior TAE had higher liver tumor burden on average than patients without prior TAE; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.06). There was no significant difference in the rates of G3 or G4 hepatotoxicity (p = 0.548 and p = 0.999, respectively) in patients who underwent prior TAE and those who were TAE-naïve. The hepatic progression-free survival was 22.9 months in TAE-naïve patients and 25.7, 20.2, and 12.8 months in patients with 1, 2, and 3 prior TAE treatments, respectively. Conclusion: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy following transarterial bland embolization for mNET is safe and effective.