Context: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) are established therapeutics for type 2 diabetes and obesity. Among other mechanisms, they slow gastric emptying and motility of the small intestine. This helps to limit postprandial glycemic excursions and reduce chylomicron formation and triglyceride absorption. Conversely, motility effects may have detrimental consequences, eg, retained gastric contents at endoscopy or general anesthesia, potentially complicated by pulmonary aspiration or bowel obstruction. Data Acquisition: We searched the PubMed database for studies involving GLP-1RA therapy and adverse gastrointestinal/biliary events. Data Synthesis: Retained gastric contents at the time of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy are found more frequently with GLP-1 RAs but rarely are associated with pulmonary aspiration. Well-justified recommendations for the periprocedural management of GLP-1RAs (eg, whether to withhold these medications and for how long) are compromised by limited evidence. Important aspects to be considered are (1) their long half-lives, (2) the capacity of GLP-1 receptor agonism to slow gastric emptying even at physiological GLP-1 concentrations, (c) tachyphylaxis observed with prolonged treatment, and (d) the limited effect on gastric emptying in individuals with slow gastric emptying before initiating treatment. Little information is available on the influence of diabetes mellitus itself (ie, in the absence of GLP-1 RA treatment) on retained gastric contents and pulmonary aspiration. Conclusion: Prolonged fasting periods regarding solid meal components, point-of-care ultrasound examination for retained gastric content, and the use of prokinetic medications like erythromycin may prove helpful and represent an important area needing further study to increase patient safety for those treated with GLP-1 RAs.

Owing to their potent glucose-lowering efficacy and substantial weight loss effects, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are now considered part of the frontline therapeutic options to treat both type 2 diabetes mellitus and nondiabetic overweight/obesity. Stemming from successful demonstration of their cardiometabolic modulation and reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events in clinical outcome trials, GLP-1 RAs have since been validated as agents with compelling cardiovascular protective properties. Studies spanning from the bench to preclinical and large-scale randomised controlled trials have consistently corroborated the cardiovascular benefits of this pharmacological class. Most notably, there is converging evidence that they exert favourable effects on atherosclerotic ischaemic endpoints, with preclinical data indicating that they may do so by directly modifying the burden and composition of atherosclerotic plaques. This narrative review examines the underlying pharmacology and clinical evidence behind the cardiovascular benefits of GLP-1 RAs, with particular focus on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. It also delves into the mechanisms that underpin their putative plaque-modifying actions, addresses existing knowledge gaps and therapeutic challenges and looks to future developments in the field, including the use of combination incretin agents for diabetes and weight loss management.

Slow gastric emptying occurs frequently during critical illness and is roughly quantified at bedside by large gastric residual volumes (GRVs). A previously published trial (The Augmented versus Routine approach to Giving Energy Trial; TARGET) reported larger GRVs with energy-dense (1.5 kcal/mL) compared with standard (1.0 kcal/mL) enteral nutrition (EN), warranting further exploration. To assess the incidence, risk factors, duration, and timing of large GRVs (≥250 mL) and its relation to clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated adults. A post-hoc analysis of TARGET data in patients with ≥1 GRV recorded. Data are n (%) or median [IQR]. Of 3876 included patients, 1777 (46%) had ≥1 GRV ≥250 mL, which was more common in males (50 compared with 39%; P < 0.001) and in patients receiving energy-dense compared with standard EN (52 compared with 40%; RR = 1.27 (95% CI: 1.19, 1.36); P < 0.001) in whom it also lasted longer (1 [0–2] compared with 0 [0–1] d; P < 0.001), with no difference in time of onset after EN initiation (day 1 [0–2] compared with 1 [0–2]; P = 0.970). Patients with GRV ≥250 mL were more likely to have the following: vasopressor administration (88 compared with 76%; RR = 1.15 [1.12, 1.19]; P < 0.001), positive blood cultures (16 compared with 8%; RR = 1.92 [1.60, 2.31]; P < 0.001), intravenous antimicrobials (88 compared with 81%; RR = 1.09 [1.06, 1.12]; P < 0.001), and prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay (ICU-free days to day 28; 12.9 [0.0–21.0] compared with 20.0 [3.9–24.0]; P < 0.001), hospital stay (hospital-free days to day 28: 0.0 [0.0–12.0] compared with 7.0 [0.0–17.6] d; P < 0.001), ventilatory support (ventilator-free days to day 28: 16.0 [0.0–23.0] compared with 22.0 [8.0–25.0]; P < 0.001), and a higher 90-d mortality (29 compared with 23%; adjusted: RR = 1.17 [1.05, 1.30]; P = 0.003). Large GRVs were more common in males and those receiving energy-dense formulae, occurred early and were short-lived, and were associated with a number of negative clinical sequelae, including increased mortality, even when adjusted for illness severity. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02306746.