María José Muñoz-Gómez

Dr. María José Muñoz-Gómez


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2021 in International Journal of Drug Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PRPablo Ryan
Pablo Ryan
jorge valenciajorge valencia
jorge valencia
GCGuillermo Cuevas
Guillermo Cuevas
JGJesús Troya García
Jesús Troya García
CRCristina Ramon
Cristina Ramon
SRSalvador Resino
Salvador Resino

8 July 2022 in Birth
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMaría Martín Vicente
María Martín Vicente
ICItziar Carrasco
Itziar Carrasco
MMMaría José Muñoz-Gómez
María José Muñoz-Gómez
AHAlicia Hernanz-Lobo
Alicia Hernanz-Lobo
VMVicente Mas
Vicente Mas
IMIsidoro Martinez
Isidoro Martinez

6 November 2021 in Journal of Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMaría Martín Vicente
María Martín Vicente
JBJuan Berenguer
Juan Berenguer
MMMaría José Muñoz-Gómez
María José Muñoz-Gómez
CDCristina Díez
Cristina Díez
RMRafael Micán
Rafael Micán
SRSalvador Resino
Salvador Resino

7 June 2024 in Journal of Infection and Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MMMaría José Muñoz-Gómez
María José Muñoz-Gómez
PRPablo Ryan
Pablo Ryan
Marta Quero-DelgadoMarta Quero-Delgado
Marta Quero-Delgado
MVMaría Martín Vicente
María Martín Vicente
GCGuillermo Cuevas
Guillermo Cuevas
SRSalvador Resino
Salvador Resino
Cancer patients often have weakened immune systems, resulting in a lower response to vaccines, especially those receiving immunosuppressive oncological treatment (OT). We aimed to assess the impact of OT on the humoral and T-cell response to the B.1 lineage and Omicron variant following COVID-19 vaccination in patients with solid and hematological neoplasms. We conducted a prospective study on cancer patients, stratified into OT and non-OT groups, who received a two-dose series of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and a booster six months later. The outcomes measured were the humoral (anti-SARS-CoV-2 S IgG titers and ACE2-S interaction inhibition capacity) and cellular (SARS-CoV-2 S-specific T-cell spots per million PBMCs) responses against the B.1 lineage and Omicron variant. These responses were evaluated four weeks after the second dose (n = 98) and eight weeks after the booster dose (n = 71). The humoral response after the second vaccine dose against the B.1 lineage and Omicron variant was significantly weaker in the OT group compared to the non-OT group (q-value<0.05). A booster dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine significantly improved the humoral response in the OT group, making it comparable to the non-OT group. The mRNA-1273 vaccine, designed for the original Wuhan strain, elicited a weaker humoral response against the Omicron variant compared to the B.1 lineage, regardless of oncological treatment or vaccine dose. In contrast, T-cell responses against SARS-CoV-2, including the Omicron variant, were already present after the second vaccine dose and were not significantly affected by oncological treatments. Cancer patients, particularly those receiving immunosuppressive oncological treatments, should require booster doses and adapted COVID-19 vaccines for new SARS-CoV-2 variants like Omicron. Future studies should evaluate the durability of the immune response and the efficacy of individualized regimens.

28 October 2023 in Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMaría José Muñoz-Gómez
María José Muñoz-Gómez
MVMaría Martín Vicente
María Martín Vicente
SVSara Vigil-Vazquez
Sara Vigil-Vazquez
ICItziar Carrasco
Itziar Carrasco
AHAlicia Hernanz-Lobo
Alicia Hernanz-Lobo
IMIsidoro Martinez
Isidoro Martinez

28 January 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SRSalvador Resino
Salvador Resino
Amanda Fernández RodríguezAmanda Fernández Rodríguez
Amanda Fernández Rodríguez
DPDaniel Pineda-Tenor
Daniel Pineda-Tenor
AGAna Zaida Gómez-Moreno
Ana Zaida Gómez-Moreno
JSJuan José Sánchez-Ruano
Juan José Sánchez-Ruano
MJMaria Angeles Jimenez-Sousa
Maria Angeles Jimenez-Sousa
Background: TRPM5 (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 5) rs886277 polymorphism has been related to liver cirrhosis from different etiologies. The present study investigates the association of TRPM5 rs886277 polymorphism with liver fibrosis progression and cirrhosis development in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 208 non-cirrhotic patients with CHC, who had at least two liver stiffness measurements (LSM) with a separation of 12 months (baseline LSM (LSM1) and the last LSM (LSM2)). Two outcome variables were considered: (1) LSM2/LSM1 ratio; (2) cirrhosis progression (F4; LSM ≥ 12.5 kPa). DNA genotyping was done at the CeGen using a MassARRAY platform. Results: The follow-up time was similar irrespective of the rs886277 genotype (46.4 months in TT genotype, 46.4 months in CT genotype, and 49.2 months in CC genotype; p = 0.649). The highest LSM increases were found in patients with CC genotype compared with TT and CT genotypes (p = 0.044 and p = 0.038, respectively). The cirrhosis progression was higher in patients with CC genotype than TT genotype (p = 0.033). Thus, the rs886277 C allele was associated with higher cirrhosis progression (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.64; p = 0.014). Moreover, rs886277 CC genotype was also related to higher values of LSM2/LSM1 ratio (adjusted arithmetic mean ratio a(AMR) = 1.31; p = 0.001) and cirrhosis progression (aOR = 4.33; p = 0.027). Conclusions: TRPM5 rs886277 polymorphism was associated with liver fibrosis progression and cirrhosis development among hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. Specifically, the rs886277 C allele and CC genotype were risk factors for advancing liver fibrosis and cirrhosis compared to the rs886277 T allele and CT/TT genotype, respectively.