The goal of end-of-life care for dying patients is to prevent or relieve suffering as much as possible while respecting the patients’ desires. However, physicians face many ethical challenges in end-of-life care. Since the decisions to be made may concern patients’ family members and society as well as the patients, it is important to protect the rights, dignity, and vigor of all parties involved in the clinical ethical decision-making process. Understanding the principles underlying biomedical ethics is important for physicians to solve the problems they face in end-of-life care. The main situations that create ethical difficulties for healthcare professionals are the decisions regarding resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, artificial nutrition and hydration, terminal sedation, withholding and withdrawing treatments, euthanasia, and physician-assisted suicide. Five ethical principles guide healthcare professionals in the management of these situations.

Background: As an important feature in patient-physician communication for both primary and clinical care, empathy is one of the basic competencies that physicians should possess. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the level of empathy among medical students in all years of medical training using two different instruments: the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (for clinical empathy level) and the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (for general empathy level). Materials and Methods: This study is a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted in 2017-2018 academic year with students studying at Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine. Data collection form, Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) and Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE) was applied to the students by the researchers. The statistical analysis was carried out by using IBM-SPSS version 23 for Mac OS. T-test, ANOVA test, Spearman and Pearson correlation analysis were used for comparisons. Results: The mean TEQ score of the students was 52.8/65 and the JSPE-S score was 80.3/100. TEQ scores of students increased up to 4th year and then decreased, but the difference between the years was not statistically significant. The third year students’ JSPE-S scores were significantly higher than that of the sixth year students. Conclusion: While the clinical empathy levels of medical students decreased significantly after 3rd year, the general empathy levels decreased less. This result shows us that we should review our medical education curriculum and educational environment, and should initiate initiatives, and devote more time to empathy education in order to prevent the decrease in empathy level and increase empathy during medical education.

Background and aim: Aging is often accompanied by chronic diseases, comorbidity, and polypharmacy. Use of prescription/nonprescription drugs, and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs seen frequently in the elderly. The aim of this study was to assess the comorbidity and multimorbidity status and to evaluate the use of prescription and nonprescription drugs in patients aged 65 years. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional and descriptive study, statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Version 22.0. Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests were applied based on meeting the assumption of a normal distribution of the data. Other statistical tests used were one-way analysis of variance tests, t tests, Pearson correlation analysis, Chi-square tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, and Spearman correlation analysis. Results: A total of 244 people participated in the study. The multimorbidity rate was 85%. Participants used an average of 4.26 drugs daily. The polypharmacy ratio was 42%. The nonprescription drug usage rate was 20%. Participants used nonprescription drugs most often with the pharmacist’s advice. Conclusion: Multimorbidity, comorbidity, prescription, and nonprescription drug use were very high among elderly patients. Because older people are more susceptible to adverse drug reactions and drug interactions, physicians who provide care to older people should take a comprehensive drug history.

Sacral stress fractures are rare injuries among professional and amateur athletes and are considered to be an uncommon source of low back pain. These type of fractures are mainly seen in competitive, high-impact sports, most commonly in long-distance runners. Sacral stress fractures are usually overlooked in young patients presenting with low back pain without any trauma history. Diagnosis of sacral stress fractures is often delayed because the history and physical examination of these patients are not specific and conventional radiographic images are frequently inadequate. A high index of clinical suspicion and further radiologic imaging such as MRI utilization can provide the accurate diagnosis. The treatment mainly includes rest, pain control, nutritional support, and biomechanical optimization. Herein, we report the case of a woman amateur golf player with a sacral stress fracture who complained of aggravating low back pain. To the best of our knowledge, this appears to be the first report of a sacral stress fracture in a golf player and also the first case of this pathology in low-impact sports. Therefore, physicians should keep in mind that stress fractures can also be seen in low-impact sports. We recommend considering stress fractures in the differential diagnosis of non-traumatic, aggravating low back pain in golfers.