Juergen Karl,

Prof. Juergen Karl,

Chair of Energy Process Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Fürther Straße 244f, D-90429 Nürnberg, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2018 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
 Juergen Karl, Juergen Karl,
Juergen Karl,
TPTobias Proell
Tobias Proell

1 September 2006 in Journal of Power Sources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KPK.D. Panopoulos
K.D. Panopoulos
LFL.E. Fryda
L.E. Fryda
 Juergen Karl, Juergen Karl,
Juergen Karl,
SPS. Poulou
S. Poulou
Emmanuel KakarasEmmanuel Kakaras
Emmanuel Kakaras

1 May 2019 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MTMartin Thema
Martin Thema
TWTobias Weidlich
Tobias Weidlich
MHManuel Hörl
Manuel Hörl
ABAnnett Bellack
Annett Bellack
FMFriedemann Mörs
Friedemann Mörs
MSMichael Sterner
Michael Sterner
Power-to-Methane as one part of Power-to-Gas has been recognized globally as one of the key elements for the transition towards a sustainable energy system. While plants that produce methane catalytically have been in operation for a long time, biological methanation has just reached industrial pilot scale and near-term commercial application. The growing importance of the biological method is reflected by an increasing number of scientific articles describing novel approaches to improve this technology. However, these studies are difficult to compare because they lack a coherent nomenclature. In this article, we present a comprehensive set of parameters allowing the characterization and comparison of various biological methanation processes. To identify relevant parameters needed for a proper description of this technology, we summarized existing literature and defined system boundaries for Power-to-Methane process steps. On this basis, we derive system parameters providing information on the methanation system, its performance, the biology and cost aspects. As a result, three different standards are provided as a blueprint matrix for use in academia and industry applicable to both, biological and catalytic methanation. Hence, this review attempts to set the standards for a comprehensive description of biological and chemical methanation processes.

1 May 2016 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMarius Dillig
Marius Dillig
MJManuel Jung
Manuel Jung
 Juergen Karl, Juergen Karl,
Juergen Karl,

1 June 2008 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PHP Hofmann
P Hofmann
KPK Panopoulos
K Panopoulos
LFL Fryda
L Fryda
ASA Schweiger
A Schweiger
JOJ Ouweltjes
J Ouweltjes
 Juergen Karl, Juergen Karl,
Juergen Karl,

25 May 2018 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSebastian Staub
Sebastian Staub
PBPeter Bazan
Peter Bazan
Konstantinos BraimakisKonstantinos Braimakis
Konstantinos Braimakis
DMDominik Müller
Dominik Müller
CRChristoph Regensburger
Christoph Regensburger
 Juergen Karl, Juergen Karl,
Juergen Karl,
Storage of electricity from fluctuating renewable energy sources has become one of the predominant challenges in future energy systems. A novel system comprises the combination of a heat pump and an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) with a simple hot water storage tank. The heat pump upgrades low temperature heat with excess power. The upgraded heat can drive an Organic Rankine Process using the heat pump in reverse operation mode. This approach allows a comparably efficient storage of excess electricity. Waste heat sources usually do not qualify for electricity production even with ORC processes due to low temperatures. Upgrading the temperature of the waste heat by means of excess electricity makes the use of an ORC feasible in order to recover the electricity input. Thermodynamic cycle simulations with IPSEpro software outline that the process provides power-to-power efficiencies in a range of 50% for small-scale applications based on commercially available heat pump components. The isentropic efficiency of compressors/expanders plays a crucial role on the system performance. Applications of the proposed cycle in the megawatt range with more efficient turbines and dynamic compressors will therefore increase the power-to-power efficiency to above 70%.