Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning as a service have become the status quo for many industries, leading to the widespread deployment of models that handle sensitive data. Well-performing models, the industry seeks, usually rely on a large volume of training data. However, the use of such data raises serious privacy concerns due to the potential risks of leaks of highly sensitive information. One prominent threat is the Membership Inference Attack, where adversaries attempt to deduce whether a specific data point was used in a model's training process. An adversary's ability to determine an individual's presence represents a significant privacy threat, especially when related to a group of users sharing sensitive information. Hence, well-designed privacy-preserving machine learning solutions are critically needed in the industry. In this work, we compare the effectiveness of L2 regularization and differential privacy in mitigating Membership Inference Attack risks. Even though regularization techniques like L2 regularization are commonly employed to reduce overfitting, a condition that enhances the effectiveness of Membership Inference Attacks, their impact on mitigating these attacks has not been systematically explored.

Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning as a service have become the status quo for many industries, leading to the widespread deployment of models that handle sensitive data. Well-performing models, the industry seeks, usually rely on a large volume of training data. However, the use of such data raises serious privacy concerns due to the potential risks of leaks of highly sensitive information. One prominent threat is the Membership Inference Attack, where adversaries attempt to deduce whether a specific data point was used in a model's training process. An adversary's ability to determine an individual's presence represents a significant privacy threat, especially when related to a group of users sharing sensitive information. Hence, well-designed privacy-preserving machine learning solutions are critically needed in the industry. In this work, we compare the effectiveness of L2 regularization and differential privacy in mitigating Membership Inference Attack risks. Even though regularization techniques like L2 regularization are commonly employed to reduce overfitting, a condition that enhances the effectiveness of Membership Inference Attacks, their impact on mitigating these attacks has not been systematically explored.

This chapter examines the ethical dimensions of data use in democratic contexts, focusing on the responsibilities and dilemmas that arise as data and AI systems become embedded in public decision-making. While previous chapters explored the potential of data to enhance participation and transparency, this chapter turns to the normative foundations that should guide such processes. It discusses key ethical principles—such as transparency, accountability, fairness, privacy and explainability—and considers how these values can be upheld in both policy and technical design. The chapter emphasizes that data ethics requires ongoing reflection, inclusive governance and public engagement. To ground these discussions, the chapter illustrates how different projects deal with data management and ethics in practice. These cases offer insights into the tensions, trade-offs and innovative approaches that emerge when aligning data-driven innovation with democratic values and underscore the importance of ethics as a dynamic and context-aware process.