Kidney transplantation is currently the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage kidney diseases. Although significant advancements in kidney transplantation have been achieved over the past decades, the host’s immune response remains the primary challenge, often leading to potential graft rejection. Effective management of the immune response is essential to ensure the long-term success of kidney transplantation. To address this issue, immunosuppressives have been developed and are now fully integrated into the clinical management of transplant recipients. However, the considerable inter- and intra-patient variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of these drugs represents the primary cause of graft rejection. This variability is primarily attributed to the polymorphic nature (genetic heterogeneity) of genes encoding xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes, transport proteins, and, in some cases, drug targets. These genetic differences can influence drug metabolism and distribution, leading to either toxicity or reduced efficacy. The main objective of the present review is to report an historical overview of the pharmacogenetics of immunosuppressants, shedding light on the most recent findings and also suggesting how relevant is the research and investment in developing validated NGS-based commercial panels for pharmacogenetic profiling in kidney transplant recipients. These advancements will enable the implementation of precision medicine, optimizing immunosuppressive therapies to improve graft survival and kidney transplanted patient outcomes.

Background/Objectives: Risk stratification of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected infection is essential. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) has emerged as a promising biomarker of immune activation and outcome prediction, but its role in febrile ED patients remains to be fully defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of suPAR and its potential clinical application in the ED. Methods: A single-center retrospective study including 125 patients was performed. Plasma suPAR levels were measured together with C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT), and their association with 28-day mortality using Cox regression and ROC curve analyses was assessed. Results: SuPAR was independently associated with the risk of 28-day mortality, showing a very high negative predictive value. Higher suPAR levels were associated with an increased risk of death. Conclusions: SuPAR may represent a valuable tool to support early patient assessment and risk stratification in the ED, potentially improving resource utilization and patient prioritization.

Background: International guidelines recommend the use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) I and T methods for the detection of myocardial injury as a pre-requisite for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients admitted to the emergency department. Recently, Mindray (Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) has introduced a new chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) for the detection of the cTn complex. The present study aims to verify and validate the hs-cTnI Mindray assay on the new automated CL2600i analyzer compared to the routine Alinity-i series instrument by Abbott (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA). Methods: This study evaluated linearity, precision through the 5 × 5 protocol, methodological comparison on plasma and serum matrices, hs-cTnI 99th percentile imprecision, and the hs-cTnI detection rate in a healthy population. Results: The results obtained proved that the performance of the Mindray hs-cTnI test on the CL2600i platform was closely comparable to the Abbott Alinity-i system (plasma R²: 0.974; serum R²: 0.995). The CVs were consistently low, and no significant differences were reported. Excellent analytical performance, with high sensitivity, was also observed in the healthy population (overall detection rate: 79%), as well as good linearity within the measuring range (R²: 0.994). Conclusions: The Mindray hs-cTnI test confirms its robustness and utility in routine practice as an advanced assay. The new technology, with more sensitive detection methods, may improve the accuracy and reliability of cardiac biomarker testing, ultimately leading to better outcomes in the management of patients with AMI and other cardiac conditions.