Hiroshi Onishi

Dr. Hiroshi Onishi

Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2007 in Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HOHiroshi Onishi
Hiroshi Onishi
HSHiroki Shirato
Hiroki Shirato
YNYasushi Nagata
Yasushi Nagata
MHMasahiro Hiraoka
Masahiro Hiraoka
MFMasaharu Fujino
Masaharu Fujino
TATsutomu Araki
Tsutomu Araki

1 December 2011 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HOHiroshi Onishi
Hiroshi Onishi
HSHiroki Shirato
Hiroki Shirato
YNYasushi Nagata
Yasushi Nagata
MHMasahiro Hiraoka
Masahiro Hiraoka
MFMasaharu Fujino
Masaharu Fujino
TATsutomu Araki
Tsutomu Araki

7 February 2013 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ANAtsushi Nambu
Atsushi Nambu
HOHiroshi Onishi
Hiroshi Onishi
SAShinichi Aoki
Shinichi Aoki
LTLicht Tominaga
Licht Tominaga
KKKengo Kuriyama
Kengo Kuriyama
TATsutomu Araki
Tsutomu Araki
As stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a highly dose-dense radiotherapy, adverse events of neighboring normal tissues are a major concern. This study thus aimed to clarify the frequency and degree of clinical symptoms in patients with rib fractures after SBRT for primary lung cancer and to reveal risk factors for rib fracture. Appropriate α/β ratios for discriminating between fracture and non-fracture groups were also investigated.

1 June 2010 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HOHiroshi Onishi
Hiroshi Onishi
HKHideyuki Kawakami
Hideyuki Kawakami
KMKan Marino
Kan Marino
TKTakafumi Komiyama
Takafumi Komiyama
KKKengo Kuriyama
Kengo Kuriyama
TATsutomu Araki
Tsutomu Araki
To evaluate the use, structural principles, operation, and acquired reproducibility of a respiratory monitoring device to be used for voluntary patient breath holding. Evaluation was performed of a respiratory monitoring device that enables determination of the respiratory level in a patient by measuring the movement of two contacts on the abdomen and chest wall. Neither metallic nor electronic materials are used in the mechanics for this device. The initial study group comprised 21 consecutive patients (15 men, six women; mean age, 75 years; range, 56-92 years) with lung or abdominal tumors who underwent examination with the device and computed tomography (CT) for three-dimensional reproducibility of lung base position during voluntary breath holding with or without use of the device. One patient with mild dementia was excluded; in most of the remaining 20 patients, high reproducibility of the breath-holding position was achieved in a short time with the device. In these 20 patients who were able to adapt to use of the device, three-dimensional mean maximum differences in lung base position during three random voluntary breath holds were 2.0 mm along the cranial-caudal axis, 1.5 mm along the anterior-posterior axis, and 1.2 mm along the right-left axis. The differences in all axes were significantly smaller with use of the respiratory monitoring device than without the device. The device demonstrates satisfactory reproducibility of voluntary patient breath holding easily and inexpensively and may offer a convenient device for easy use during irradiation with voluntary breath-holding conditions that require a small internal margin.

10 May 2014 in Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
J(Japanese Radiological Society multi-institutional SBRT study group (JRS-SBRTSG)
Japanese Radiological Society multi-institutional SBRT study group (JRS-SBRTSG)
HYHideomi Yamashita
Hideomi Yamashita
HOHiroshi Onishi
Hiroshi Onishi
YMYasuo Matsumoto
Yasuo Matsumoto
NMNaoya Murakami
Naoya Murakami
KNKeiichi Nakagawa
Keiichi Nakagawa
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a relatively new treatment for liver tumor. The outcomes of SBRT for liver tumor unfit for ablation and surgical resection were evaluated. Liver tumor patients treated with SBRT in seven Japanese institutions were studied retrospectively. Patients given SBRT for liver tumor between 2004 and 2012 were collected. Patients treated with SBRT preceded by trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) were eligible. Seventy-nine patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 51 patients with metastatic liver tumor were collected. The median biologically effective dose (BED) (α/β = 10 Gy) was 96.3 Gy for patients with HCC and 105.6 Gy with metastatic liver tumor. The median follow-up time was 475.5 days in patients with HCC and 212.5 days with metastatic liver tumor. The 2-year local control rate (LCR) for HCC and metastatic liver tumor was 74.8% ± 6.3% and 64.2 ± 9.5% (p = 0.44). The LCR was not different between BED10 ≥ 100 Gy and < 100 Gy (p = 0.61). The LCR was significantly different between maximum tumor diameter > 30 mm vs. ≤ 30 mm (64% vs. 85%, p = 0.040) in all 130 patients. No grade 3 laboratory toxicities in the acute, sub-acute and chronic phases were observed. There was no difference in local control after SBRT in the range of median BED10 around 100 Gy for between HCC and metastatic liver tumor. SBRT is safe and might be an alternative method to resection and ablation. There was no difference in local control after SBRT in the range of median BED10 around 100 Gy for between HCC and metastatic liver tumor and SBRT is safe and might be an alternative method to resection and ablation.

2 August 2018 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HOHiroshi Onishi
Hiroshi Onishi
HYHideomi Yamashita
Hideomi Yamashita
YSYoshiyuki Shioyama
Yoshiyuki Shioyama
YMYasuo Matsumoto
Yasuo Matsumoto
KTKenji Takayama
Kenji Takayama
KKKengo Kuriyama
Kengo Kuriyama
Pretreatment pulmonary interstitial change (PIC) has been indicated as a risk factor of severe radiation pneumonitis (RP) following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage lung cancer, but details of its true effect remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate treatment outcomes of SBRT for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in patients with PIC. A total of 242 patients are included in this study (88% male). The median age is 77 years (range, 55–92 years). A total dose of 40–70 Gy is administered in 4 to 10 fractions during a 4-to-25 day period. One, two, and three-year overall survival (OS) rates are 82.1%, 57.1%, and 42.6%, respectively. Fatal RP is identified in 6.9% of all patients. The percent vital capacity 10%), performance status of 2–4, presence of squamous cell carcinoma, clinical T2 stage, regular use of steroid before SBRT, and percentage predicting forced expiratory volume in one second (<70%) are associated with worse prognoses for OS. Our results indicate that fatal RP frequently occurs after SBRT for stage I lung cancer in patients with PIC.