Kai Rong

Mr. Kai Rong


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 May 2024 in Earth Science Informatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KRKai Rong
Kai Rong
XXXuan Xu
Xuan Xu
HWHaibo Wang
Haibo Wang
JYJun Yang
Jun Yang

31 May 2025 in Earth Science Informatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KRKai Rong
Kai Rong
XXXuan Xu
Xuan Xu
HWHaibo Wang
Haibo Wang
JYJun Yang
Jun Yang

4 July 2025 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KRKai Rong
Kai Rong
YJYongsheng Jia
Yongsheng Jia
YYYingkang Yao
Yingkang Yao
JSJinshan sun
Jinshan sun
QYQi Yu
Qi Yu
XXXianqi Xie
Xianqi Xie
The drilling and blasting method is commonly employed for the rapid demolition of outdated buildings by destroying key structural components and inducing progressive collapse. The residual bearing capacity of these components is governed by the deformation morphology of the longitudinal reinforcement, characterized by bending deflection and exposed height. This study develops and validates a finite element (FE) model of a reinforced concrete (RC) column subjected to demolition blasting. By varying concrete compressive strength, the yield strength of longitudinal reinforcement, the longitudinal reinforcement ratio, and the shear reinforcement ratio, 45 FE models are established to simulate the post-blast morphology of longitudinal reinforcement. Two databases are created: one containing 45 original simulation cases, and an augmented version with 225 cases generated through data augmentation. To predict bending deflection and the exposed height of longitudinal reinforcement, artificial neural network (ANN) and random forest (RF) models are optimized using the hunter–prey optimization (HPO) algorithm. Results show that the HPO-optimized RF model trained on the augmented database achieves the best performance, with MSE, MAE, and R2 values of 0.004, 0.041, and 0.931 on the training set, and 0.007, 0.057, and 0.865 on the testing set, respectively. Sensitivity analysis reveals that the yield strength of longitudinal reinforcement has the most significant impact, while the shear reinforcement ratio has the least influence on both output variables. The partial dependence plot (PDP) analysis indicates that the ratio of shear reinforcement has the most significant impact on the deformation of longitudinal reinforcement.