Background and Objectives: Melorheostosis, also referred to in the literature as Leri’s disease, is an unusual mesenchymal dysplasia with the clinical appearance of benign sclerosing bone dysplasia; it frequently occurs in late adolescence. Any bone in the skeletal system can be affected by this disease, though the long bones of the lower extremities are the most common, at any age. Melorheostosis has a chronic evolution, and symptoms are usually absent in the early stages. The etiopathogenesis is still unknown, however, numerous theories have been proposed that could explain the appearance of this lesion formation. An association with other benign or malignant bone lesions is also possible, and associations with osteosarcoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, or Buschke–Ollendorff syndrome have also been reported. There have also been reported cases of the malignant transformation of a pre-existing melorheostosis lesion into malignant fibrous histiocytoma or osteosarcoma. The diagnosis of melorheostosis can be made only based on radiological images, but, due to its polymorphism, additional imaging investigations are often necessary and sometimes only a biopsy can establish a definite diagnosis. Because there are currently no guidelines for treatment based on scientific evidence, due to the low number of cases diagnosed worldwide, our objective was to highlight the early recognition and specific surgical treatments for better prognosis and outcomes. Materials and Methods: We conducted a review of the literature consisting of original papers, case reports, and case series and presented the clinical and paraclinical characteristics of melorheostosis. We aimed to synthesize the treatment methods available in the literature as well as determine possible future directions related to the treatment of melorheostosis. Furthermore, we presented the results of a case of femoral melorheostosis admitted to the orthopedics department of the University Emergency Hospital of Bucharest in a 46-year-old female patient with severe pain in the left thigh and limitation of joint mobility. Following the clinical examination, the patient complained of pain in the middle third of the left thigh in the antero-medial compartment; the pain appeared spontaneously and was aggravated during physical activity. The pain started about two years prior, but the patient experienced complete pain relief after the administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In the last six months, the patient presented an increase in pain intensity without significant improvement following the administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The patient’s symptoms were mainly determined by the increase in the volume of the tumor and the mass effect on the adjacent tissues, especially on the vessels and the femoral nerve. The CT examination and bone scintigraphy showed a unique lesion in the middle third of the left femur and no oncological changes in the thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic regions; however, at the level of the femoral shaft, there was a localized cortical and pericortical bone lesion formation that surrounded approximately 180 degrees of the femoral shaft (anterior, medial, and lateral). It had a predominantly sclerotic structure but was associated with lytic areas with thickening of the bone cortex and areas of periosteal reaction. The next therapeutic gesture was to perform an incisional biopsy using a lateral approach at the level of the thigh. The histopathological result supported the diagnosis of melorheostosis. Additionally, immunohistochemical tests completed the data obtained after the microscopic examination through the classic histopathological technique The patient was discharged and included in a full medical recovery program for eight weeks in a specialized medical center, during which she also received analgesic treatment in maximum doses, but without improvement regarding her symptoms. Taking into account the chronic evolution of the pain, the complete lack of response to conservative treatment after eight weeks, and the lack of treatment guidelines in the case of melorheostosis, a surgical approach needed to be considered. The surgical option in this case, considering the circumferential location of the lesion at the level of the femoral diaphysis, was a radical resection. The surgical approach consisted of segmental resection to healthy bone tissue and reconstruction of the remaining defect with a modular tumoral prosthesis. At the 45-day postoperative control, the patient no longer complained of pain in the operated-on limb and was mobile with full support without gait difficulties. The follow-up period was one year, and the patient presented complete pain relief and a very good functional outcome. Results: In the case of asymptomatic patients, conservative treatment seems to be a good option with optimal results. However, for benign tumors, it remains unclear whether radical surgery is a viable option. Conclusions: Melorheostosis remains an incompletely understood disease, given the limited number of cases worldwide, and thus, there is a lack of clinical guidelines regarding specialized treatment.

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone malignancy in children and adolescents, which is also considered an aggressive disease due to its rapid growth rate, ability to metastasize early, and complex and heterogeneous tumor microenvironment (TME). Although we are developing improved surgical and chemotherapeutic approaches, the presence of metastatic or recurrent disease is still detrimental to the patient’s outcome. Major advances in understanding the molecular mechanisms of OS are needed to substantially improve outcomes for patients being treated for OS. This review integrates new data on the molecular biology, pathophysiology, and immune landscape of OS, as well as introducing salient areas of tumorigenesis underpinning these findings, such as chromothripsis; kataegis; cancer stem cell dynamics; and updated genetic, epigenetic, and glycosylation modifiers. In addition, we review promising biomarkers, diagnostic platforms, and treatments, including immunotherapy, targeted small molecule inhibitors, and nanomedicine. Using genomic techniques, we have defined OS for its significant genomic instability due to TP53 and RB1 mutations, chromosomal rearrangements, and aberrant glycosylation. The TME is also characterized as immunosuppressive and populated by tumor-associated macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and regulatory T cells, ultimately inhibiting immune checkpoint inhibitors. Emerging fields such as glycomics and epigenetics, as well as stem cell biology, have defined promising biomarkers and targets. Preclinical studies have identified that glycan-directed CAR therapies could be possible, as well as metabolic inhibitors and 3D tumor models, which presented some preclinical success and could allow for tumoral specificity and enhanced efficacy. OS is a biologically and clinically complex disease; however, advances in exploring the molecular and immunologic landscape of OS present new opportunities in biomarkers and the development of new treatment options with adjunctive care. Successful treatments in the future will require personalized, multi-targeted approaches to account for tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion. This will help us turn the corner in providing improved outcomes for patients with this resilient malignancy.

Introduction: Total hip arthroplasty is a major orthopedic intervention, which is increasingly performed, and involves a variable duration of postoperative hospitalization. Estimating this duration is essential for optimizing resources and improving perioperative planning. Materials and Methods: The retrospective study included 85 patients admitted to an orthopedic clinic between 2020 and 2025, undergoing primary hip arthroplasty. Pre- and postoperative clinical, biological, and surgical data were collected. Based on these variables, the H.I.P.P.O. (Hip Intervention Patient Prognostic Outcome) score was developed, using a Random Forest algorithm to predict the length of stay (short, medium, long). Results: The model achieved an overall accuracy of 80%. The most important predictors were as follows: day of surgery, type of prosthesis, preoperative fibrinogen, INR, APTT, preoperative hemoglobin, age, and presence of liver cirrhosis. The H.I.P.P.O. score allowed efficient stratification of patients and showed a high capacity to identify cases at risk of prolonged hospitalization (F1 score = 0.857). Conclusions: The H.I.P.P.O. score is a practical, interpretable, and clinically applicable tool that integrates biological and organizational factors to predict the length of stay after hip arthroplasty. It can support surgical decision making and optimize perioperative management.

The increasing prevalence of periprosthetic femoral fractures, specifically in the vicinity of the hip, has emerged as a significant issue in recent times. Consequently, there is a need for a thorough examination to enhance the effectiveness of management and treatment approaches. The findings emphasized a significant disparity in the occurrence and characteristics of these fractures, as multiple studies have highlighted the efficacy of various treatment strategies, such as open reduction and internal fixation, as well as the utilization of cortical strut allografts. Furthermore, the research has identified potential risk factors that have an impact on the characteristics of fractures, providing valuable insights that could be crucial in the development of preventive strategies. This research provides a thorough examination of periprosthetic femoral fractures, highlighting the importance of a cohesive treatment algorithm to improve the handling of such fractures. Moreover, it promotes the need for a collaborative endeavor in conducting research in this field, cultivating a more profound comprehension that has the potential to drive progress in therapeutic approaches, ultimately enhancing patient results over an extended period of time. It is crucial that forthcoming research endeavors persist in expanding upon these discoveries, striving towards a unified methodology in tackling this substantial clinical obstacle.

This article has been revised to add an affiliation for Dr. Andrei Danet. His first affiliation is: Department of Cardiac Surgery, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.