Shirui Li

Mr. Shirui Li


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 June 2024 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LZLiang Zhao
Liang Zhao
Rui SunRui Sun
Rui Sun
JZJingyu Zhang
Jingyu Zhang
ZLZhigang Liu
Zhigang Liu
SLShirui Li
Shirui Li
Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) holds enormous potential for accurately estimating terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP). However, current studies often overlook the spatial representativeness of satellite SIF and GPP observations. This research downscaled TROPOMI SIF (TROPOSIF) and its enhanced product (eSIF) in China’s Saihanba Forest Region to obtain high-resolution SIF data. SIF was simulated using the SCOPE model, and the downscaled SIF’s reliability was validated at two forest eddy covariance (EC) sites (SHB1 and SHB2) in the study area. Subsequently, the downscaled SIF data were matched to the EC footprint of the two forest sites, and the relationship between SIF and GPP was compared at various observational scales. Additionally, the ability of downscaled TROPOSIF and eSIF to track GPP was compared, along with the correlations among several vegetation indices (VIs) and GPP. The findings reveal the following: (1) Downscaled TROPOSIF and eSIF showed a strong linear relationship with SCOPE-modeled SIF (R2 ≥ 0.86). The eSIF closely matched the SCOPE simulation (RMSE: 0.06 mw m−2 nm−1 sr−1) and displayed a more consistent seasonal variation pattern with GPP. (2) Comparisons among coarse-resolution SIF, EC footprint-averaged SIF (SIFECA), and EC footprint-weighted SIF (SIFECW) demonstrated significant improvements in the linear relationship between downscaled SIF and GPP (the R2 increased from the range of 0.47–0.65 to 0.78–0.85). SIFECW exhibited the strongest relationship with GPP, indicating that matching SIF to flux footprints improves their relationship. (3) As the distance from the flux tower increased, the relationship between SIF and GPP weakened, reaching its lowest point beyond 1 km from the tower. Moreover, in the highly heterogeneous landscape of the SHB2 site, the relationship between VIs and GPP was poor, with no clear pattern as distance from the flux tower increased. In conclusion, the strong spatial dependency of SIF and tower-based GPP emphasizes the importance of using high-resolution SIF to accurately quantify their relationship.

22 May 2025 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLShirui Li
Shirui Li
Rui SunRui Sun
Rui Sun
Xin LiXin Li
Xin Li
LYLi Yang
Li Yang
LZliang zhao
liang zhao
YXYufei Xu
Yufei Xu
Amino acids (AAs) and tea polyphenols (TPs) are essential quality indicators in tea, impacting sensory attributes and economic value. Hyperspectral technology enables efficient, real-time detection of these compounds on field-grown tea leaves. “The original spectra were preprocessed using fractional-order derivatives (0.1–1.0 orders) to enhance subtle spectral features. Compared to fixed integer-order derivatives (e.g., first or second order), fractional-order derivatives allow continuous tuning between 0 and 1, thereby amplifying minor absorption peaks while effectively suppressing noise amplification”. The Competitive Adaptive Reweighted Sampling (CARS) method selects optimal spectral bands, and Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) models were built with raw spectral reflectance as independent variables and AA and TP content as dependent variables. Results show that FOD had better prediction accuracy compared to classical integer-order derivatives, e.g., the optimal FOD order of 0.7 for AA prediction increased the R2 from 0.73 to 0.80 and reduced the RMSE from 0.30% to 0.25%, while for TP prediction, a FOD order of 0.1 raised the R2 from 0.40 to 0.42 and lowered the RMSE from 4.03% to 3.96%. In addition, CARS shows a better performance over the correlation coefficient (CC) method in model accuracy, contributing to more accurate selection of sensitive bands for the content prediction of tea ingredients. Our FOD–CARS–PLSR models achieved an R2 of 0.80 and RMSE of 0.25% for AAs, and an R2 of 0.42 and RMSE of 3.96% for TPs in fresh tea leaves. Beyond tea quality monitoring, this flexible preprocessing and modeling framework can be readily adapted to estimate biochemical or biophysical properties in other crops, soils, or vegetated ecosystems, offering a generalizable tool for precision agriculture and environmental sensing.

3 February 2026 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLShirui Li
Shirui Li
Rui SunRui Sun
Rui Sun
Yong HeYong He
Yong He
Xin LiXin Li
Xin Li
LYLi Yang
Li Yang
YXYufei Xu
Yufei Xu
Accurate, nondestructive assessment of fresh tea leaf quality is important for breeding and field management, yet most spectral work still targets processed or low-moisture products. Here, a mechanistically guided hyperspectral method was developed to estimate free amino acids (AA) and total polyphenols (TP) in fresh leaves. Spectral experiments on purified AA and TP powders and their water mixtures identified a key spectral window at 1660 nm. Fractional-order derivatives were applied to leaf reflectance spectra from 102 spring samples (53 varieties), and full-spectrum Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) models were used as comparison and validated on an independent set of 40 summer samples. PLSR achieved decent cross-validation coefficient of determination accuracy for AA (Rcv2=0.867) and TP (Rcv2=0.755) and good external prediction coefficient of determination accuracy (RP2=0.793 and 0.776, respectively). Guided by the powder and leaf-level analysis, two-band NDSI indices were derived: the AA index of 1735/1626 nm (R2ₚ = 0.687, RPDₚ = 1.788) and the TP index of 1673/1660 nm (R2ₚ = 0.785, RPDₚ = 2.157) approached the PLSR, indicating that much of the useful information for AA and TP is concentrated in this narrow window and can be captured by simple, interpretable indices potentially suitable for in-field sensing, pending validation across multiple sites, seasons, and management conditions.