Julia Stelmach

Ms. Julia Stelmach

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 June 2025 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJulia Stelmach
Julia Stelmach
JRJakub Rychlik
Jakub Rychlik
MZMarta Zawadzka
Marta Zawadzka
MMMaria Mazurkiewicz-Bełdzińska
Maria Mazurkiewicz-Bełdzińska
Background/objectives: Social media has significantly enhanced access to medical knowledge by enabling rapid information sharing. With YouTube being the second-most popular website, we intended to evaluate the quality of its content as a source of information for patients and relatives for information about cerebral palsy. Methods: The first 30 videos for search terms “Cerebral palsy”, “Spastic cerebral palsy”, “Dyskinetic cerebral palsy”, “Worster-Drought syndrome”, and “Ataxic cerebral palsy” were selected for inquiry. Out of 150 films, a total of 83 were assessed with a mixed method approach by two independent raters utilizing evidence-based quality scales such as Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information (DISCERN), the Journal of the American Medical Association instrument (JAMA), and the Global Quality Score (GQS). Furthermore, audience engagement was analyzed, and the Video Power Index (VPI) was calculated for each video. Results: The mean total DISCERN score excluding the final question (subjective assessment of the video) was 30.5 ± 8.7 (out of 75 points), implying that the quality of the videos was poor. The global JAMA score was 2.36 ± 0.57 between the raters. The mean GQS score reached 2.57 ± 0.78. The videos had statistically higher DISCERN scores when they included treatment options, risk factors, anatomy, definition, information for doctors, epidemiology, doctor as a speaker, and patient experience. Conclusions: YouTube seems to be a poor source of information for patients and relatives on cerebral palsy. The analysis can contribute to creating more engaging, holistic, and informative videos regarding this topic.

27 February 2026 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMichał Krakowiak
Michał Krakowiak
JSJulia Stelmach
Julia Stelmach
JDJarosław Dzierżanowski
Jarosław Dzierżanowski
TBTomasz Borusiński
Tomasz Borusiński
PZPiotr Zieliński
Piotr Zieliński
Background/Objectives: Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability and work absenteeism worldwide. Lumbar facet joint degeneration is a common source of chronic LBP, and when conservative treatment fails, interventional procedures may be indicated. Cryodenervation is a minimally invasive option that remains less extensively studied. This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes, cost–utility, and return-to-work rates following lumbar facet joint cryodenervation. Methods: A retrospective study included 42 professionally active patients treated with lumbar facet joint cryoablation between 2020 and 2022 at a tertiary neurosurgical center. All patients had facet-mediated LBP confirmed by a positive diagnostic medial branch block. Pain (VAS), disability (ODI), and work status were assessed before and after treatment. ODI scores were converted to SF-6D utilities to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Cost data were obtained from institutional records. Results: Mean ODI improved from 48.5 ± 12.8 to 36.6 ± 17.8, and mean VAS from 7.0 ± 1.7 to 3.8 ± 2.0. Mean SF-6D increased from 0.53 to 0.59, corresponding to a gain of 0.0103 QALYs over four months (annualized 0.0309). The mean procedure cost was 1905 PLN, resulting in approximately 185,000 PLN per QALY, which is within the national cost-effectiveness threshold. Overall, 58.5% of patients returned to work, with the highest rate in those aged 30–39 years (83.3%). Conclusions: Lumbar facet cryoablation provides meaningful pain relief and functional improvement at a favorable cost-effectiveness profile. Younger patients show higher return-to-work rates. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

6 August 2026 in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JDJarosław Dzierżanowski
Jarosław Dzierżanowski
MKMichał Krakowiak
Michał Krakowiak
JSJulia Stelmach
Julia Stelmach
NHNatalia Haczyk
Natalia Haczyk
PZPiotr Zieliński
Piotr Zieliński
When thinking about the beginning of modern anatomical drawings that reflect topography in detail, our thoughts often turn to the more than 200 woodcuts included in Andreas Vesalius’s “De humani corporis fabrica libri septem.” However, Leonardo da Vinci also produced detailed anatomical sketches before the publication of the Fabrica, including drawings that addressed the cerebral ventricular system. The goal of this narrative historical review is to examine how medical knowledge of the ventricular system evolved from antiquity, represented by Galen of Pergamon and Hippocrates of Kos, toward post-Galenic anatomy. This analysis is based on four sketches created between approximately 1487 and 1509, held in the collections of the Royal Library at Windsor, England, and the Schlossmuseum in Weimar, Germany. Although medical literature frequently references Leonardo’s anatomical work, relatively few studies have focused specifically on the morphology of the ventricular system while also considering the physiology and philosophy of the turn of the 15th and 16th centuries. This study therefore analyzes Leonardo’s ventricular drawings as an important transitional episode in the visual history of neuroanatomy. At the same time, it acknowledges that Leonardo’s anatomical studies were largely unpublished during his lifetime, that their influence on later anatomists remains uncertain, and that retrospective interpretation of historical drawings requires caution.