Dongming Liu

Dr. Dongming Liu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2021 in Ocean Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLDongming Liu
Dongming Liu
PLPengzhi Lin
Pengzhi Lin
MXMi-An Xue
Mi-An Xue
LCLin Cheng
Lin Cheng
JLJijian Lian
Jijian Lian

3 May 2022 in Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DLDongming Liu
Dongming Liu
PLPengzhi Lin
Pengzhi Lin
For a fluid system with an interface between two-layer liquids and a free surface, there exist two series of natural frequencies. Under vertical excitations, the interface and the free surface can be excited separately or simultaneously. Laboratory experiments were conducted to excite the first- and second-mode Faraday waves on the free surface, which forced the in-phase motion of the interface. The experimental data were used to validate the extended numerical model NEWTANK. The secondary surface instability in the form of period tripling breaking occurred on the free surface when second-mode surface resonant response was large. Further numerical investigations were conducted to study the resonance of interface and in addition to the primary Faraday instability, the secondary interface instability occurred due to Rayleigh–Taylor (RT) instability. The analysis revealed that this was due to the contribution from the combined effects of vertical fluid acceleration and external excitation, which made the upper layer liquid essentially ‘heavier’ than the lower layer at certain instances, even when the amplitude of acceleration of the external excitation was lower than that of gravity at all times. A dimensionless parameter ‘normalised effective gravitational acceleration’ (NEGA) was proposed to quantify the occurrence criterion of RT instability in a dynamic fluid system. Furthermore, simultaneous resonances at both the interface and the free surface were studied and reverse flows could be formed across the interface as the upper Faraday waves and lower Faraday waves moved in opposite directions, which generated the secondary interface instability of Kelvin–Helmholtz (KH) type. When KH instability took place, more energy was transferred to higher frequency modes as time evolved.

1 May 2022 in Physics of Fluids
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DLDongming Liu
Dongming Liu
YWYang Wu
Yang Wu
PLPengzhi Lin
Pengzhi Lin
The non-resonant and resonant responses of a two-layer liquid system in a tank under pitch excitation were investigated experimentally in this study. The movement of both the free surface and the interface was automatically identified simultaneously by an image processing method, which can rectify the visually tilted frames in a moving system. When the frequency of external excitation was near the natural frequency related to upper layer liquid, free surface resonance can be triggered. On the other hand, when the frequency of the external excitation was close to the natural frequency related to lower layer, resonant response of the interface between two liquids occurred. It is also found that Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities with different length scales can be generated due to the reverse direction of velocities near the interface under different conditions. Such length scale of the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability can be estimated by using the critical Richardson number. In addition, the bottom of the tank may restrict the development of wave trough on the interface when the depth of lower layer was relatively shallow, while the free surface may limit the wave crest of interface when the thickness of the upper layer was small. Further investigations of the interface displacements for both non-resonant and resonant responses were also conducted in frequency domain.

11 July 2023 in Ocean Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJijian Lian
Jijian Lian
TXTianrun Xiao
Tianrun Xiao
DLDongming Liu
Dongming Liu
FYFangdi Ye
Fangdi Ye
DXDongzhi Xiong
Dongzhi Xiong

11 May 2026 in Journal of Mountain Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DLDan Liu
Dan Liu
Jijian LianJijian Lian
Jijian Lian
FLFang Liu
Fang Liu
BMBin Ma
Bin Ma
DLDongming Liu
Dongming Liu
JZJinxin Zhang
Jinxin Zhang
Accurately predicting ski-jump flood discharge atomization is crucial for designing effective disaster-mitigation measures, particularly because low ambient pressure increases the risk of atomized protection in high-altitude regions. However, owing to the complex effects of low ambient pressure on strongly coupled atomized field sources, it is difficult to fully describe the comprehensive behaviour of such sources theoretically, which limits the further development of random splashing numerical models. In this paper, a refined random splashing numerical model characterized by low ambient pressure is developed based on experimental results and applied to high-altitude earth–rockfill dam projects. Compared with the reference ambient pressure condition ( P 0 = 101.457 kPa), which corresponds to the same flood discharge flow, a decrease in ambient pressure by 0.1P 0 leads to a maximum change rate not exceeding 10 m for the characteristic boundary of the 10 mm/h atomized rain intensity line at the QX Hydropower Station. This observation also applies to both the 40 mm/h and 10 mm/h atomized rain intensity lines at the RM Hydropower Station. For the two groups of flip bucket types designed for the RM Hydropower station, the loads associated with atomized protection are predominantly concentrated on the left bank. The maximum height of the 10 mm/h atomized rain intensity line affected by atomized rain ranges from 0.83 to 0.85 times the maximum dam height of 315 m. The distance between the farthest downstream boundary and the Spillway No. 3 outlet is between 666.80 and 692.40 metres. Since the flip bucket shape variations only slightly affect the atomization zone extent, further optimization is needed. The study can provide valuable methodological and decision-making support for safeguarding against existing and potential impacts within areas affected by flood discharge atomization from high-altitude hydropower stations.

Jijian LianJijian Lian
Jijian Lian
XWXiaoqun Wang
Xiaoqun Wang
JLJijian Lian
Jijian Lian
BMBin Ma
Bin Ma
DLDongming Liu
Dongming Liu
As excess water is discharged from a high dam, low frequency noise (air pulsation lower than 10 Hz, LFN) is generated and propagated in the surrounding areas, causing environmental hazards such as the vibration of windows and doors and the discomfort of local residents. To study the generation mechanisms and key influencing factors of LFN induced by flood discharge and energy dissipation from a high dam with a ski-jump type spillway, detailed prototype observations and analyses of LFN are carried out. The discharge flow field is simulated and analyzed using a gas-liquid turbulent flow model. The acoustic response characteristics of the air cavity, which is formed between the discharge nappe and dam body, are analyzed using an acoustic numerical model. The multi-sources generation mechanisms are first proposed basing on the prototype observation results, vortex sound model, turbulent flow model and acoustic numerical model. Two kinds of sources of LFN are studied. One comes from the energy dissipation of submerged jets in the plunge pool, the other comes from nappe-cavity coupled vibration. The results of the analyses reveal that the submerged jets in the plunge pool only contribute to an on-site LFN energy of 0–1.0 Hz, and the strong shear layers around the high-velocity submerged jets and wall jet development areas are the main acoustic source regions of LFN in the plunge pool. In addition, the nappe-cavity coupled vibration, which is induced when the discharge nappe vibrates with close frequency to the model frequency of the cavity, can induce on-site LFN energy with wider frequency spectrum energy within 0–4.0 Hz. By contrast, the contribution degrees to LFN energy from two acoustic sources are almost same, while the contribution degree from nappe-cavity coupled vibration is slightly higher.