Oliver Diaz Montesdeoca

Dr. Oliver Diaz Montesdeoca

Mathematics and computer science, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 February 2019 in Journal of Medical Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RARicha Agarwal
Richa Agarwal
Oliver Diaz MontesdeocaOliver Diaz Montesdeoca
Oliver Diaz Montesdeoca
XLXavier Llado
Xavier Llado
MYMoi Hoon Yap
Moi Hoon Yap
RMRobert Martí
Robert Martí
With recent advances in the field of deep learning, the use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in medical imaging has become very encouraging. The aim of our paper is to propose a patch-based CNN method for automated mass detection in full-field digital mammograms (FFDM). In addition to evaluating CNNs pretrained with the ImageNet dataset, we investigate the use of transfer learning for a particular domain adaptation. First, the CNN is trained using a large public database of digitized mammograms (CBIS-DDSM dataset), and then the model is transferred and tested onto the smaller database of digital mammograms (INbreast dataset). We evaluate three widely used CNNs (VGG16, ResNet50, InceptionV3) and show that the InceptionV3 obtains the best performance for classifying the mass and nonmass breast region for CBIS-DDSM. We further show the benefit of domain adaptation between the CBIS-DDSM (digitized) and INbreast (digital) datasets using the InceptionV3 CNN. Mass detection evaluation follows a fivefold cross-validation strategy using free-response operating characteristic curves. Results show that the transfer learning from CBIS-DDSM obtains a substantially higher performance with the best true positive rate (TPR) of 0.98 ± 0.02 at 1.67 false positives per image (FPI), compared with transfer learning from ImageNet with TPR of 0.91 ± 0.07 at 2.1 FPI. In addition, the proposed framework improves upon mass detection results described in the literature on the INbreast database, in terms of both TPR and FPI.

1 March 2021 in Physica Medica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Oliver Diaz MontesdeocaOliver Diaz Montesdeoca
Oliver Diaz Montesdeoca
KKKaisar Kushibar
Kaisar Kushibar
RORichard Osuala
Richard Osuala
ALAkis Linardos
Akis Linardos
LGLidia Garrucho
Lidia Garrucho
KLKarim Lekadir
Karim Lekadir
The vast amount of data produced by today's medical imaging systems has led medical professionals to turn to novel technologies in order to efficiently handle their data and exploit the rich information present in them. In this context, artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as one of the most prominent solutions, promising to revolutionise every day clinical practice and medical research. The pillar supporting the development of reliable and robust AI algorithms is the appropriate preparation of the medical images to be used by the AI-driven solutions. Here, we provide a comprehensive guide for the necessary steps to prepare medical images prior to developing or applying AI algorithms. The main steps involved in a typical medical image preparation pipeline include: (i) image acquisition at clinical sites, (ii) image de-identification to remove personal information and protect patient privacy, (iii) data curation to control for image and associated information quality, (iv) image storage, and (v) image annotation. There exists a plethora of open access tools to perform each of the aforementioned tasks and are hereby reviewed. Furthermore, we detail medical image repositories covering different organs and diseases. Such repositories are constantly increasing and enriched with the advent of big data. Lastly, we offer directions for future work in this rapidly evolving field.

16 April 2024 in European Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Oliver Diaz MontesdeocaOliver Diaz Montesdeoca
Oliver Diaz Montesdeoca
ARAlejandro Rodríguez-Ruíz
Alejandro Rodríguez-Ruíz
ISIoannis Sechopoulos
Ioannis Sechopoulos
This review provides an overview of the current state of artificial intelligence (AI) technology for automated detection of breast cancer in digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). It aims to discuss the technology, available AI systems, and the challenges faced by AI in breast cancer screening. The review examines the development of AI technology in breast cancer detection, focusing on deep learning (DL) techniques and their differences from traditional computer-aided detection (CAD) systems. It discusses data pre-processing, learning paradigms, and the need for independent validation approaches. DL-based AI systems have shown significant improvements in breast cancer detection. They have the potential to enhance screening outcomes, reduce false negatives and positives, and detect subtle abnormalities missed by human observers. However, challenges like the lack of standardised datasets, potential bias in training data, and regulatory approval hinder their widespread adoption. AI technology has the potential to improve breast cancer screening by increasing accuracy and reducing radiologist workload. DL-based AI systems show promise in enhancing detection performance and eliminating variability among observers. Standardised guidelines and trustworthy AI practices are necessary to ensure fairness, traceability, and robustness. Further research and validation are needed to establish clinical trust in AI. Collaboration between researchers, clinicians, and regulatory bodies is crucial to address challenges and promote AI implementation in breast cancer screening.

1 June 2020 in Computers in Biology and Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RARicha Agarwal
Richa Agarwal
Oliver Diaz MontesdeocaOliver Diaz Montesdeoca
Oliver Diaz Montesdeoca
MYMoi Hoon Yap
Moi Hoon Yap
XLXavier Llado
Xavier Llado
RMRobert Martí
Robert Martí
In recent years, the use of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) in medical imaging has shown improved performance in terms of mass detection and classification compared to current state-of-the-art methods. This paper proposes a fully automated framework to detect masses in Full-Field Digital Mammograms (FFDM). This is based on the Faster Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Faster-RCNN) model and is applied for detecting masses in the large-scale OPTIMAM Mammography Image Database (OMI-DB), which consists of ∼80,000 FFDMs mainly from Hologic and General Electric (GE) scanners. This research is the first to benchmark the performance of deep learning on OMI-DB. The proposed framework obtained a True Positive Rate (TPR) of 0.93 at 0.78 False Positive per Image (FPI) on FFDMs from the Hologic scanner. Transfer learning is then used in the Faster R-CNN model trained on Hologic images to detect masses in smaller databases containing FFDMs from the GE scanner and another public dataset INbreast (Siemens scanner). The detection framework obtained a TPR of 0.91±0.06 at 1.69 FPI for images from the GE scanner and also showed higher performance compared to state-of-the-art methods on the INbreast dataset, obtaining a TPR of 0.99±0.03 at 1.17 FPI for malignant and 0.85±0.08 at 1.0 FPI for benign masses, showing the potential to be used as part of an advanced CAD system for breast cancer screening.

15 July 2025 in European Journal of Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BKBurak Kocak
Burak Kocak
Michail KlontzasMichail Klontzas
Michail Klontzas
Arnaldo StanzioneArnaldo Stanzione
Arnaldo Stanzione
AMAymen Meddeb
Aymen Meddeb
ADAydin Demircioglu
Aydin Demircioglu
Renato CuocoloRenato Cuocolo
Renato Cuocolo

25 November 2022 in Medical Image Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RORichard Osuala
Richard Osuala
KKKaisar Kushibar
Kaisar Kushibar
LGLidia Garrucho
Lidia Garrucho
ALAkis Linardos
Akis Linardos
ZSZuzanna Szafranowska
Zuzanna Szafranowska
KLKarim Lekadir
Karim Lekadir
Despite technological and medical advances, the detection, interpretation, and treatment of cancer based on imaging data continue to pose significant challenges. These include inter-observer variability, class imbalance, dataset shifts, inter- and intra-tumour heterogeneity, malignancy determination, and treatment effect uncertainty. Given the recent advancements in image synthesis, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and adversarial training, we assess the potential of these technologies to address a number of key challenges of cancer imaging. We categorise these challenges into (a) data scarcity and imbalance, (b) data access and privacy, (c) data annotation and segmentation, (d) cancer detection and diagnosis, and (e) tumour profiling, treatment planning and monitoring. Based on our analysis of 164 publications that apply adversarial training techniques in the context of cancer imaging, we highlight multiple underexplored solutions with research potential. We further contribute the Synthesis Study Trustworthiness Test (SynTRUST), a meta-analysis framework for assessing the validation rigour of medical image synthesis studies. SynTRUST is based on 26 concrete measures of thoroughness, reproducibility, usefulness, scalability, and tenability. Based on SynTRUST, we analyse 16 of the most promising cancer imaging challenge solutions and observe a high validation rigour in general, but also several desirable improvements. With this work, we strive to bridge the gap between the needs of the clinical cancer imaging community and the current and prospective research on data synthesis and adversarial networks in the artificial intelligence community.