Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the robustness and reproducibility of computed tomography‐based texture analysis (CTTA) metrics extracted from CT images of a customized texture phantom built for assessing the association of texture metrics to three‐dimensional (3D) printed progressively increasing textural heterogeneity.Materials and Methods: A custom‐built 3D‐printed texture phantom comprising of six texture patterns was used to evaluate the robustness and reproducibility of a radiomics panel under a variety of routine abdominal imaging protocols. The phantom was scanned on four CT scanners (Philips, Canon, GE, and Siemens) to assess reproducibility. The robustness assessment was conducted by imaging the texture phantom across different CT imaging parameters such as slice thickness, field of view (FOV), tube voltage, and tube current for each scanner. The texture panel comprised of 387 features belonging to 15 subgroups of texture extraction methods (e.g., Gray‐level Co‐occurrence Matrix: GLCM). Twelve unique image settings were tested on all the four scanners (e.g., FOV125). Interclass correlation two‐way mixed with absolute agreement (ICC3) was used to assess the robustness and reproducibility of radiomic features. Linear regression was used to test the association between change in radiomic features and increased texture heterogeneity. Results were summarized in heat maps.Results: A total of 5612 (23.2%) of 24 090 features showed excellent robustness and reproducibility (ICC ≥ 0.9). Intensity, GLCM 3D, and gray‐level run length matrix (GLRLM) 3D features showed best performance. Among imaging variables, changes in slice thickness affected all metrics more intensely compared to other imaging variables in reducing the ICC3. From the analysis of linear trend effect of the CTTA metrics, the top three metrics with high linear correlations across all scanners and scanning settings were from the GLRLM 2D/3D and discrete cosine transform (DCT) texture family.Conclusion: The choice of scanner and imaging protocols affect texture metrics. Furthermore, not all CTTA metrics have a linear association with linearly varying texture patterns.

Objectives: For optimal utilization of healthcare resources, there is a critical need for early identification of COVID-19 patients at risk of poor prognosis as defined by the need for intensive unit care and mechanical ventilation. We tested the feasibility of chest X-ray (CXR)-based radiomics metrics to develop machine-learning algorithms for predicting patients with poor outcomes. Methods: In this Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant, retrospective study, we evaluated CXRs performed around the time of admission from 167 COVID-19 patients. Of the 167 patients, 68 (40.72%) required intensive care during their stay, 45 (26.95%) required intubation, and 25 (14.97%) died. Lung opacities were manually segmented using ITK-SNAP (open-source software). CaPTk (open-source software) was used to perform 2D radiomics analysis. Results: Of all the algorithms considered, the AdaBoost classifier performed the best with AUC = 0.72 to predict the need for intubation, AUC = 0.71 to predict death, and AUC = 0.61 to predict the need for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). AdaBoost had similar performance with ElasticNet in predicting the need for admission to ICU. Analysis of the key radiomic metrics that drive model prediction and performance showed the importance of first-order texture metrics compared to other radiomics panel metrics. Using a Venn-diagram analysis, two first-order texture metrics and one second-order texture metric that consistently played an important role in driving model performance in all three outcome predictions were identified. Conclusions: Considering the quantitative nature and reliability of radiomic metrics, they can be used prospectively as prognostic markers to individualize treatment plans for COVID-19 patients and also assist with healthcare resource management. Advances in knowledge: We report on the performance of CXR-based imaging metrics extracted from RT-PCR positive COVID-19 patients at admission to develop machine-learning algorithms for predicting the need for ICU, the need for intubation, and mortality, respectively.

Objective: This study assesses the robustness of first‐order radiomic texture features namely interquartile range (IQR), coefficient of variation (CV) and standard deviation (SD) derived from computed tomography (CT) images by varying dose, reconstruction algorithms and slice thickness using scans of a uniform water phantom, a commercial anthropomorphic liver phantom, and a human liver in‐vivo.Materials and Methods: Scans were acquired on a 16 cm detector GE Revolution Apex Edition CT scanner with variations across three different nominal slice thicknesses: 0.625, 1.25, and 2.5 mm, three different dose levels: CTDIvol of 13.86 mGy for the standard dose, 40% reduced dose and 60% reduced dose and two different reconstruction algorithms: a deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR‐high) algorithm and a hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm ASiR‐V50% (AV50) were explored, varying one at a time. To assess the effect of non‐linear modifications of images by AV50 and DLIR‐high, images of the water phantom were also reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP). Quantitative measures of IQR, CV and SD were extracted from twelve pre‐selected, circular (1 cm diameter) regions of interest (ROIs) capturing different texture patterns across all scans.Results: Across all scans, imaging, and reconstruction settings, CV, IQR and SD were observed to increase with reduction in dose and slice thickness. An exception to this observation was found when using FBP reconstruction. Lower values of CV, IQR and SD were observed in DLIR‐high reconstructions compared to AV50 and FBP. The Poisson statistics were more stringently noted in FBP than DLIR‐high and AV50, due to the non‐linear nature of the latter two algorithms.Conclusion: Variation in image noise due to dose reduction algorithms, tube current, and slice thickness show a consistent trend across phantom and patient scans. Prospective evaluation across multiple centers, scanners and imaging protocols is needed for establishing quality assurance standards of radiomics.

Objective: To perform a systematic assessment and analyze the quality of radiomics methodology in current literature in the evaluation of renal masses using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) approach. Methods: We systematically reviewed recent radiomics literature in renal masses published in PubMed, EMBASE, Elsevier, and Web of Science. Two reviewers blinded by each other’s scores evaluated the quality of radiomics methodology in studies published from 2015 to August 2021 using the RQS approach. Owing to the diversity in the imaging modalities and radiomics applications, a meta-analysis could not be performed. Results: Based on our inclusion/exclusion criteria, a total of 87 published studies were included in our study. The highest RQS was noted in three categories: reporting of clinical utility, gold standard, and feature reduction. The average RQS of the two reviewers ranged from 5 ≤ RQS≤19, with the maximum attainable RQS being 36. Very few (7/87 i.e., 8%) studies received an average RQS that ranged from 17 < RQS≤19, which represents studies with the highest RQS in our study. Many (39/87 i.e., 45%) studies received an average RQS that ranged from 13 < RQS≤15. No significant interreviewer scoring differences were observed. Conclusions: We report that the overall scientific quality and reporting of radiomics studies in renal masses is suboptimal, and subsequent studies should bolster current deficiencies to improve reporting of radiomics methodologies. Advances in knowledge: The RQS approach is a meaningful quantitative scoring system to assess radiomics methodology quality and supports a comprehensive evaluation of the radiomics approach before its incorporation into clinical practice.