Ebubekir Yuksel

Prof. Dr. Ebubekir Yuksel


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2016 in Desalination and Water Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Murat EyvazMurat Eyvaz
Murat Eyvaz
TATaha Aslan
Taha Aslan
SASerkan Arslan
Serkan Arslan
EYEbubekir Yuksel
Ebubekir Yuksel
İKİsmail Koyuncu
İsmail Koyuncu
Forward osmosis or osmotic membrane bioreactor (FOMBR) has attracted great attention for wastewater treatment and reuse since conceptually introduced as a process. It has been proposed to reduce the high energy consumption in the conventional MBR, has lower membrane fouling propensity, and produce higher quality water. Moreover, RO process can be used after FOMBR to reconcentrate the diluted DS to be used for FO again. Besides significant advantages, when compared to conventional MBRs; lower water flux, concentration polarization, and salt accumulation because of high retention of FO in the bioreactor still remains as major drawbacks and challenges of FOMBR systems that need to be solved. In the last few years, many advances in development of FOMBR are stated to overcome the drawbacks of the system. The researches focused on manufacturing of high performance FO membranes and orientation, utilizing various different draw solutions providing required osmotic pressure and minimum reverse salt flux, and recently hybrid systems to alleviate the salt accumulation in bioreactor. However, the main critical challenges of FOMBR have not been completely resolved yet. This paper reviews the design and applications of FOMBR process in wastewater treatment. Particular focus was given to reverse salt flux and effects of the system performance; recent developments in FOMBR applications from beginning till today are reported.

20 September 2017
Verified
Book Chapter
Open access
PDF file
Murat EyvazMurat Eyvaz
Murat Eyvaz
SASerkan Arslan
Serkan Arslan
EGErcan Gürbulak
Ercan Gürbulak
EYEbubekir Yuksel
Ebubekir Yuksel
Filtration is considered the keystone of water and wastewater treatment and is used for various purposes, such as sludge dewatering and concentrating any solution. Moreover, as an advanced filtration technology, membranes can remove materials ranging from large visible particles to molecular and ionic chemical species. Proper selection of filter media/membrane material in filtration processes is often the most important consideration for assuring efficient separation. Filter media can be classified by their materials of construction, such as cotton, wool, linen, glass fiber, porous carbon, metals, and rayons. Recently, new polymeric materials have been used both individually and/or blended in filtration processes for the treatment of waters and wastewaters. The purpose of this chapter is to bring an overview on the textile-originated filter materials in filtration applications from conventional filtration to advanced membrane processes. Although many researches on filter media are available, very few researches have been carried out on the cutting-edge technologies about using filter materials on filtration processes from classical to advanced membrane processes. Therefore, in this part of the book, following major and minor titles are stated truly on the aforementioned new technologies and linked with conventional methods in water and wastewater treatment applications.

28 March 2018
Verified
Book Chapter
Open access
PDF file
Murat EyvazMurat Eyvaz
Murat Eyvaz
SASerkan Arslan
Serkan Arslan
DIDerya İmEr
Derya İmEr
EYEbubekir Yuksel
Ebubekir Yuksel
İKİsmail Koyuncu
İsmail Koyuncu
Forward osmosis (FO) is a technical term describing the natural phenomenon of osmosis: the transport of water molecules across a semi-permeable membrane. The osmotic pressure difference is the driving force of water transport, as opposed to pressure-driven membrane processes. A concentrated draw solution (DS) with osmotic pressure draws water molecules from the feed solution (FS) through a semi-permeable membrane to the DS. The diluted DS is then reconcentrated to recycle the draw solutes as well as to produce purified water. As a major disadvantage, nature of FO membranes (asymmetrical structure) causes international concentration polarization (ICP) which promotes the decrease in water flux. Therefore, the number of studies related to improving both active and support layers of FO membranes is increasing in the applications. The purpose of the chapter is to bring an overview on the FO membrane manufacturing, characterizing and application area at laboratory or full scales. This chapter is published in two parts. In the first part, which appears here, the overview of membrane technologies and the definition of forward osmosis process are stated. The manufacturing methods of support and active layers forming FO membranes are described with common and/or new modification procedures.

7 June 2025 in Membranes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OTOruç Kaan Türk
Oruç Kaan Türk
MÇMEHMET ÇAKMAKCI
MEHMET ÇAKMAKCI
İZİsmail Hakkı Zengin
İsmail Hakkı Zengin
DKDogan Karadag
Dogan Karadag
EYEbubekir Yuksel
Ebubekir Yuksel
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), used since the 1940s, are persistent and carcinogenic pollutants. Water is a major exposure route; effective removal is essential. While nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) are effective but costly, ultrafiltration (UF) membranes offer advantages such as lower cost and higher flux, but their relatively large pore size makes them ineffective for PFAS compounds like perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). Since PFAS removal depends on both pore size and surface properties, this study investigates the effect of polyelectrolyte multilayer coatings using poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH) and poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) on the zeta potential of UF membranes. Pristine UF membranes showed limited performance (UP150: ~2% for both PFOS and PFOA; UP020: 34.4% PFOS, 24.1% PFOA), while coating significantly enhanced removal (coated UP150: 45.3% PFOS, 43.4% PFOA; coated UP020: 77.8% PFOS, 73.3% PFOA). The modified UF membranes achieved PFAS removal efficiencies significantly closer to NF membranes, though still below those of RO (e.g., BW30XLE: up to 91.0% PFOS, 88.3% PFOA; NP030: up to 81.0% PFOS, 79.3% PFOA). Findings emphasize the importance of membrane surface charge and suggest that modified UF membranes offer a promising, low-cost alternative for PFAS removal under low-pressure conditions.

7 August 2017 in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FYFatma Busra Yaman
Fatma Busra Yaman
MÇMEHMET ÇAKMAKCI
MEHMET ÇAKMAKCI
EYEbubekir Yuksel
Ebubekir Yuksel
İÖİsmail Özen
İsmail Özen
EGErhan Gengec
Erhan Gengec

15 March 2024
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
Ahmed AlbahnasaviAhmed Albahnasavi
Ahmed Albahnasavi
Murat EyvazMurat Eyvaz
Murat Eyvaz
Motasem AlazaizaMotasem Alazaiza
Motasem Alazaiza
NÖNurullah Özdoğan
Nurullah Özdoğan
EGErcan Gurbulak
Ercan Gurbulak
EYEbubekir Yuksel
Ebubekir Yuksel