Khaled Greish

Prof. Khaled Greish

Arabian Gulf University, Colleage of Medicine and Medical Sciences
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2006 in Drug Discovery Today
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Arun K. IyerArun K. Iyer
Arun K. Iyer
Khaled GreishKhaled Greish
Khaled Greish
JFJun Fang
Jun Fang
HMHiroshi Maeda
Hiroshi Maeda


1 January 2007 in Journal of Drug Targeting
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Khaled GreishKhaled Greish
Khaled Greish
Over the past two decades cancer has ascended the causes of human death to be number one or two in many nations world wide. A major limitation inherent to most conventional anticancer chemotherapeutic agents is their lack of tumor selectivity. One way to achieve selective drug targeting to solid tumors is to exploit abnormalities of tumor vasculature, namely, hypervascularisation; aberrant vascular architecture; extensive production of vascular permeability factors stimulating extravasation within tumor tissues; and lack of lymphatic drainage. Maeda and his colleagues have extensively studied tumor vascular abnormalities in terms of active and selective delivery of anticancer drugs to tumor tissues, notably defining the enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR effect) of macromolecular drugs in solid tumors. Due to their large molecular size, nanosized macromolecular anticancer drugs administered intravenously (i.v.) escape renal clearance. Often they can not penetrate the tight endothelial junctions of normal blood vessels, but they can extravasate in tumour vasculature and become trapped in the tumor vicinity. With time the tumor concentration will build up reaching several folds higher than that of the plasma due to lack of efficient lymphatic drainage in solid tumor; an ideal application for EPR-based selective anticancer drug delivery. Establishing this principle hastened development of various polymer conjugates and polymeric micelles as well as multifunctional nanoparticles for targeted cancer chemotherapy. Indeed this selective high local concentration of nanosized anticancer drugs in tumor tissues has proven superior in therapeutic effect with minimal side effects in both preclinical and clinical settings. In this review the mechanisms and factors involved in the EPR effect, as well as the uniqueness of nanoscale drugs for tumor targeting through EPR effect, will be discussed in detail.

1 October 2016 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLDuy Luong
Duy Luong
PKPrashant Kesharwani
Prashant Kesharwani
RDRahul Deshmukh
Rahul Deshmukh
MAMohd Cairul Iqbal Mohd Amin
Mohd Cairul Iqbal Mohd Amin
UGUmesh Gupta
Umesh Gupta
Arun K. IyerArun K. Iyer
Arun K. Iyer

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMaha Alghamdi
Maha Alghamdi
AFAntonino Nicolò Fallica
Antonino Nicolò Fallica
Nicola Filippo VirzìNicola Filippo Virzì
Nicola Filippo Virzì
PKPrashant Kesharwani
Prashant Kesharwani
Valeria PittalàValeria Pittalà
Valeria Pittalà
Khaled GreishKhaled Greish
Khaled Greish
Both personalized medicine and nanomedicine are new to medical practice. Nanomedicine is an application of the advances of nanotechnology in medicine and is being integrated into diagnostic and therapeutic tools to manage an array of medical conditions. On the other hand, personalized medicine, which is also referred to as precision medicine, is a novel concept that aims to individualize/customize therapeutic management based on the personal attributes of the patient to overcome blanket treatment that is only efficient in a subset of patients, leaving others with either ineffective treatment or treatment that results in significant toxicity. Novel nanomedicines have been employed in the treatment of several diseases, which can be adapted to each patient-specific case according to their genetic profiles. In this review, we discuss both areas and the intersection between the two emerging scientific domains. The review focuses on the current situation in personalized medicine, the advantages that can be offered by nanomedicine to personalized medicine, and the application of nanoconstructs in the diagnosis of genetic variability that can identify the right drug for the right patient. Finally, we touch upon the challenges in both fields towards the translation of nano-personalized medicine.

1 December 2012 in Journal of Controlled Release
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STSebastien Taurin
Sebastien Taurin
HNHayley Nehoff
Hayley Nehoff
Khaled GreishKhaled Greish
Khaled Greish