Background/Objectives: Muscle tissues are a common source of symptoms related to low back pain (LBP), with myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) being a significant contributor. Since previous meta-analyses support interventions targeting MTrPs for reducing pain and improving functional disability in patients with LBP, this review aimed to synthesize current knowledge on the prevalence of MTrPs in LBP patients. Methods: To conduct this systematic review, data were collected from PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science. Published articles at any time up to February 2025 that comprised descriptive, observational, or experimental studies in English/Spanish language reporting the prevalence of active or latent MTrPs in patients with LBP were eligible. After assessing the methodological quality, a structured and qualitative synthesis was conducted using a standardized form that captured participant characteristics, evaluated muscles, the number or percentage of active and latent MTrPs in each group, clinical features, summarized results, and conclusions. Results: Nine articles with acceptable methodological quality were included. The prevalence of active MTrPs in patients with LBP was quadratus lumborum (ranging from 30% to 55%), gluteus medius (from 34% to 45%), piriformis (42%), psoas (from 5% to 10%), and lumbar iliocostalis (from 33% to 38%). Latent MTrPs were most common in the gluteus medius (74%) and quadratus lumborum (14–17%), with the piriformis, psoas, and lumbar iliocostalis also affected. Conclusions: Active and latent MTrPs are common in muscles such as the quadratus lumborum, gluteus medius, and iliocostalis in individuals with LBP, with prevalence varying by pain chronicity and etiology. MTrPs in the gluteal region are more frequent in lumbosacral radiculopathy, suggesting a neurogenic-like component. Since the subjectivity of manual palpation and study heterogeneity limit generalizability of the results, future research should standardize diagnostic criteria of MTrPs to ensure the consistency of results.

Background/Objectives: The quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle is a key structure involved in patients with low back pain (LBP). Since the discriminative capability of morphological descriptors is uncertain and considering the high prevalence of myofascial trigger points and the poor reliability of manual palpation in this condition, developing a reliable procedure for assessing the QL’s tenderness is needed for facilitating the diagnosis and monitoring changes over time. We aimed to analyze the intra- and inter-examiner reliability of SWE for calculating the QL tenderness in patients with LBP. Methods: Using a convex transducer, longitudinal shear wave elastography (SWE) images of the QL muscle were acquired bilaterally twice in 52 volunteers with moderate LBP and disability by one experienced examiner and one novel examiner to measure shear wave speed and Young’s modulus as stiffness metrics. Results: Intra-examiner reliability estimates demonstrated high consistency independently of the examiner’s experience (intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) > 0.930) for both metrics. However, experienced examiners showed smaller minimal detectable changes. Additionally, inter-examiner reliability was lower, with ICCs ranging from 0.57 to 0.68, and significant differences in mean values between examiners (p < 0.01) were found. Conclusions: This procedure exhibited excellent intra-examiner reliability for assessing QL muscle stiffness in patients suffering LBP, indicating high repeatability of measurements when performed by the same examiner. In addition, experienced examiners demonstrated greater sensitivity in detecting real changes not attributed to measurement errors. However, inter-examiner reliability was moderate, highlighting the need for consistent examiner use to avoid measurement variability and averaging multiple measurements to enhance the accuracy.

Background/Objectives: Cervical pain is defined as pain in the neck that may or may not radiate to one or both upper extremities and lasts at least one day. Headaches are within the spectrum of neck pain, defined as any painful sensation perceived in the head that can extend to the neck. They are classified as primary (migraines and tension headaches) or secondary (cervicogenic headaches) depending on their clinical presentation and associated symptoms. The objective of this review is to compare the effects of dry needling with and without spinal manipulative techniques versus the application of other physical therapy modalities. Methods: A systematic review was conducted searching articles compatible with the objectives of this study in PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases using the search terms spinal manipulation, cervical manipulation, dry needling, headache, headaches, and migraine over the last five years and combined with the Boolean operators AND and OR. After screening, all studies underwent methodological quality assessments using the PEDro scale and qualitative synthesis for study design, patients’ characteristics, interventions, comparators, outcomes assessed and main results data. Results: Thirteen randomized clinical trials were selected. The quality of the studies is varied, with PEDro scale values ranging from six to eight. Dry needling and cervical manipulations have proven to be effective tools, compared to other interventions, in reducing pain and improving functionality in patients with headaches. Conclusions: Dry needling techniques and manipulations have shown significant effects on parameters related to pain, sensitivity, functionality, and general health in patients with headaches. However, future studies are necessary to more deeply analyze the long-term effects of both techniques.

Background: Latent myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) are clinically relevant because they lower local pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), can perturb motor control, and may sustain shoulder symptoms even when overt pain is absent. However, even if previous studies assessed stiffness and mechanosensitivity differences between MTrPs and asymptomatic regions, objective patient-level cut-offs and diagnostic-accuracy metrics to distinguish latent MTrPs from adjacent asymptomatic tissue are lacking. Objective: To quantify the diagnostic accuracy of pressure algometry (PPT) and shear-wave elastography (SWE) for distinguishing latent MTrPs from adjacent asymptomatic tissue. Methods: A single-center cross-sectional study was conducted including 76 volunteers with ≥1 latent infraspinatus MTrP (assessed by following the current Delphi consensus criteria). The most sensitive latent MTrP and a control site 2 cm cranial was measured on the dominant side infraspinatus muscle in each participant. PPT and SWE were acquired with a standardized protocol (long-axis imaging, anisotropy control, minimal probe pressure; three captures per site; 1 cm rectangular ROI; operator blinded to site type). ROC analyses estimated areas under the curve (AUCs), Youden-optimal cut-offs, sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LR+/−). Results: Latent MTrPs showed lower PPTs than controls (p < 0.001) and higher stiffness (shear modulus: p = 0.009; shear-wave speed: p = 0.022). PPT yielded AUC = 0.704 with an optimal cut-off of 47.5 N (sensitivity 0.75; specificity 0.592; LR+ 1.84; LR− 0.42), outperforming SWE metrics (shear modulus AUC 0.611; cut-off 23.6 kPa; sensitivity 0.632; specificity 0.605; LR+ 1.60; LR− 0.61; shear-wave speed AUC 0.601; cut-off 2.55 m/s; sensitivity 0.592; specificity 0.632; LR+ 1.61; LR− 0.65). Conclusions: In the infraspinatus, PPT provides moderate discrimination between latent MTrPs and adjacent asymptomatic tissue, whereas resting SWE—despite small mean differences—exhibited lower accuracy. These findings support mechanosensitivity as a primary measurable signal and position SWE as an adjunct. External validation across devices and operators, and multivariable models integrating sensory, imaging, and clinical features, are warranted.

Background and Objectives: Sternocleidomastoid (SCM) dysfunction is commonly implicated in several musculoskeletal conditions. Accordingly, shear-wave elastography has been used to characterize SCM stiffness in asymptomatic and clinical cohorts. However, the only reproducibility study available reported limited reliability, so clinical interpretations should be made with caution. Therefore, this study revisits key methodological aspects of that protocol to assess intra-examiner reliability and includes two examiners with different levels of expertise to evaluate inter-examiner reliability. Materials and Methods: A longitudinal observational study was conducted, recruiting twenty-five asymptomatic participants. Two examiners with different experience levels participated in this study after following structured training. For each side, images were obtained in immediate succession in the sequence experienced–novice–experienced–novice (with side order randomized), using an ROI spanning full muscle thickness, stabilizing approximately 10 s before freezing to record Young’s modulus and shear-wave speed. Results: Inter-examiner agreement was good–excellent: single-measurement ICCs were 0.77–0.86, improving to 0.79–0.87 when averaging two trials, which also reduced the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable changes (MDCs). Between-examiner mean differences were small and nonsignificant (p ≥ 0.068). Intra-examiner reliability was excellent (ICC ≈ 0.93–0.94) with small absolute errors. Precision was high (SEM ~5–6 kPa; 0.22 m/s), and MDCs were ~15–16 kPa and ~0.60 m/s, with no trial-to-trial bias (all p ≥ 0.311). Conclusions: The revised protocol showed excellent intra-examiner repeatability and good–excellent inter-examiner reliability with minimal bias. Averaging two acquisitions improved precision, while a single operator optimized longitudinal stability.