The growing consumption of oil and gas resources and the increasing difficulty of extraction have created major challenges for traditional manufacturing and maintenance, particularly in the timely supply of critical components, customized production, and complex structure fabrication. Additive manufacturing (AM) technology, with its high design freedom, precision, and rapid prototyping, provides new approaches to address these issues. However, systematic reviews of related efforts are scarce. This paper reviews the applications and progress of metal and non-metal AM technologies in oil and gas extraction and gathering engineering, focusing on the just-in-time (JIT) manufacturing of failed components, the manufacturing and repair of specialized equipment and tools for oil and gas extraction and gathering, and artificial core and reservoir geological modeling fabrication. AM applications in this field remain exploratory and face challenges with regard to their standards, supply chains, materials, and processes. Future research should emphasize developing materials and processes for extreme conditions, optimizing process parameters, establishing standards and traceability systems, and integrating AM with digital design and reverse engineering to support efficient, safe, and sustainable industry development. This work aims to provide a reference for advancing AM research and engineering applications in the oil and gas sector.

The collision between solids in fluid is common in engineering, but the numerical simulation method is less studied. A direct numerical simulation method combining the sharp interface immersed boundary method and the finite element method based on penalty function was established for solid–solid collision and coupling with fluid. The lubrication model for cylinder structures with and without fluid flow was developed using the data regression method. The partitioned coupling algorithm was used to realize the coupling solution between the fluid and solid domains. Four numerical examples were presented to demonstrate the validity of the established method. The numerical simulation of the vortex-induced collisions between two side-by-side cylinders showed the capabilities of the proposed method.

In this study, two failure modes, yield buckling of the compression ring section and strength failure in the roof-to-shell of the tank, have been proposed for a vertical vaulted tank. The failure criteria of the two failure modes in the roof-to-shell of vault tanks are established via finite element analysis of three tanks of 640 m³, 3200 m³, and 6800 m³ in volume. The finite element models are built with axisymmetric elements and spatial multi-elements. Based on the strength failure criterion, the failure pressure formula in the vaulted tank roof-to-shell is derived. The maximum relative error between the theoretical calculation and numerical simulation is 9.7%. Finally, we verify the strength failure criterion through a tank failure test; the maximum relative error between the test and theoretical calculation is 9.6%. The failure pressure of both failure modes has been compared and analyzed. The failure pressure of the yield buckling in the compression ring section is about 1.65 times that of the strength failure in the roof-to-shell of the tank.