Introduction: Intradural extramedullary and intramedullary spinal tumors are rare, complex to treat, and require advanced surgical techniques. Ultrasonic aspirators, commonly used for tumor removal, can cause sensory and motor deficits, including loss of motor evoked potentials (MEPs). This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasonic aspirators in intramedullary tumor surgery using a swine model, comparing different systems and techniques. Methods: Ten pigs underwent D1-D3 laminectomy and myelotomy, with adipose tissue simulating a tumor. The ultrasonic aspirators were tested under varying conditions (fragmentation power, suction, application time, and vibration mode). The primary endpoint is to evaluate the impact of the chosen variables on motor function damage. The secondary endpoints are histological evaluation of the type of damage caused by ultrasound aspirators and the effect of steroid drugs on MEPs’ impairment recovery. Results: Ultrasound aspirators can cause a significant MEP signal reduction when used in continuous mode, with fragmentation power >30 for more than 2 min (p < 0.001). Suction does not affect MEPs. When used in alternating/pulsatile mode, fragmentation power and application time do not affect MEPs. The two-way ANOVA analysis on the interaction between fragmentation power and application time in continuous mode did not demonstrate a significant interaction (p = 0.155). Time alone does not affect motor damage (p = 0.873). Betamethasone can restore MEPs’ signal after damage if administered immediately. Conclusions: Using ultrasonic aspirators in an animal model of intramedullary tumor surgery is safe. The main factor that resulted in the responsibility of motor function impairment is the fragmentation power.

Post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) complicates very frequently the clinical course of patients with moderate to severe head injury (up to 20% of these patients). Nowadays, the pathogenesis of PTH is still not clear. Pathological changes of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) resulting from trauma are the result of altered factors widely described in the literature, like CSF dinamics (secretion, absorption, circulation), osmotic pressure load of CSF, intracranial pressure changes (intracranial hemorrhages, cerebral contusions, brain edema), surgical treatments. The scope of this chapter is to clarify the state of the art of this topic, discussing pathogenesis, diagnostic criteria, treatment and possible prevention.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal meningiomas (SMs) are relatively rare primary spinal neoplasms, and the increasingly growing mean age and number of older patients presenting with spinal neoplasms raise questions concerning the costs and benefits of proposing surgical intervention. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes and complications of a large cohort of older patients with SMs to define the real benefit of surgery in these patients. METHODS: A total of 261 SMs were operated on between 1976 and December 2021, and 156 matched the inclusion criteria for the final cohort. Patients were divided into three groups according to age: < 50 years (group A), between 51 and 74 years (group B), and > 75 years (group C). Neurological and clinical outcomes, resection grade, complications, histology, and possible recurrences were evaluated. RESULTS: The final cohort comprised 156 patients (126 females, 30 males) with a mean ± SD age of 55.93 ± 14.80 years. The mean follow-up was 41.5 ± 11.4 months. Group A was found to have a significantly higher Frankel score at follow-up; there was no significant difference between mean scores for groups B and C. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference between the subgroups in patients who showed improvement from their preoperative neurological condition. Only 3 recurrences were recorded, all in group A. Axial topography, level of the lesions, and preoperative symptoms, including impairment of the sphincter functions, demonstrated no statistically significant interaction in the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study supports the concept that older age might not be a contraindication for surgical treatment in SMs because of the important improvements in functional status and quality of life achieved in this population subgroup. Older patients can benefit from prompt assessment and early surgery in cases of acute onset, with a complication rate not higher than that of younger patients.