Gillian Drew

Dr. Gillian Drew

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2009 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CVC.A. Velis
C.A. Velis
Phil LonghurstPhil Longhurst
Phil Longhurst
GDGillian Drew
Gillian Drew
RSRichard Burman Smith
Richard Burman Smith
SPS.J.T. Pollard
S.J.T. Pollard

1 February 2006 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTM.P.M. Taha
M.P.M. Taha
GDGillian Drew
Gillian Drew
Phil LonghurstPhil Longhurst
Phil Longhurst
RSRichard Burman Smith
Richard Burman Smith
SPS.J.T Pollard
S.J.T Pollard

30 November 2010 in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CVC. A. Velis
C. A. Velis
Phil LonghurstPhil Longhurst
Phil Longhurst
GDGillian Drew
Gillian Drew
RSRichard Burman Smith
Richard Burman Smith
SPS. J. T. Pollard
S. J. T. Pollard
The move from disposal-led waste management to resource management demands an ability to map flows of the properties of waste. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of how mechanical–biological treatment (MBT) plants, and the unit processes that comprise them, perform in relation to management of material flows, while transforming inputs into output fractions. Focus is placed on the properties relating to the quality of MBT-derived fuels. Quality management initiatives for refuse-derived fuels (RDF) or solid recovered fuels (SRF) are reviewed and SRF quality from MBT plants is assessed through a statistical analysis of published data. This can provide a basis for a targeted reduction in pollution load from solid MBT outputs and subsequent end-user emissions. Our analysis, among else, (1) verifies the difficulty of chemical separation solely by mechanical means; (2) illustrates the trade-off between achieving a high quality of recoverable outputs and the quantity/properties of reject material; and (3) indicates that SRF quality could respond to legislative requirements and market needs, if specific improvements (reduction of Cl, Cu, and Pb content) are achieved. Further research could enhance the confidence in the ability of MBT plants to produce a quality-assured SRF suitable for specific end-users, without contradicting the wider requirement for an overall sustainable management of resources.

26 September 2018 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CRCatherine Rolph
Catherine Rolph
CGCeri Gwyther
Ceri Gwyther
STSean F. Tyrrel
Sean F. Tyrrel
Zaheer  NasarZaheer Nasar
Zaheer Nasar
GDGillian Drew
Gillian Drew
TGToni Gladding
Toni Gladding
Endotoxin is a bioaerosol component that is known to cause respiratory effects in exposed populations. To date, most research focused on occupational exposure, whilst much less is known about the impact of emissions from industrial operations on downwind endotoxin concentrations. A review of the literature was undertaken, identifying studies that reported endotoxin concentrations in both ambient environments and around sources with high endotoxin emissions. Ambient endotoxin concentrations in both rural and urban areas are generally below 10 endotoxin units (EU) m−3; however, around significant sources such as compost facilities, farms, and wastewater treatment plants, endotoxin concentrations regularly exceeded 100 EU m−3. However, this is affected by a range of factors including sampling approach, equipment, and duration. Reported downwind measurements of endotoxin demonstrate that endotoxin concentrations can remain above upwind concentrations. The evaluation of reported data is complicated due to a wide range of different parameters including sampling approaches, temperature, and site activity, demonstrating the need for a standardised methodology and improved guidance. Thorough characterisation of ambient endotoxin levels and modelling of endotoxin from pollution sources is needed to help inform future policy and support a robust health-based risk assessment process.

1 July 2014 in Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AVA. Tamer Vestlund
A. Tamer Vestlund
RAR. Al-Ashaab
R. Al-Ashaab
STS.F. Tyrrel
S.F. Tyrrel
Phil LonghurstPhil Longhurst
Phil Longhurst
SPS.J.T. Pollard
S.J.T. Pollard
GDGillian Drew
Gillian Drew
This research classifies the physical morphology (form and structure) of bioaerosols emitted from open windrow composting. Aggregation state, shape and size of the particles captured are reported alongside the implications for bioaerosol dispersal after release. Bioaerosol sampling took place at a composting facility using personal air filter samplers. Samples were analysed using scanning electron microscopy. Particles were released mainly as small (1 μm) single cells, with aggregates occurring in smaller proportions. Most aggregates consisted of clusters of 2-3 particles as opposed to chains, and were <10 μm in size. No cells were attached to soil debris or wood particles. These small single cells or small aggregates are more likely to disperse further downwind from source, and cell viability may be reduced due to increased exposure to environmental factors.

17 October 2011 in FEMS Microbiology Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LPLouise J. Pankhurst
Louise J. Pankhurst
CWCorinne B. Whitby
Corinne B. Whitby
MPMark Pawlett
Mark Pawlett
LLLee D. Larcombe
Lee D. Larcombe
BMBoyd McKew
Boyd McKew
FCFrederic Coulon
Frederic Coulon
In this study, the microbial community within compost, emitted into the airstream, downwind and upwind from a composting facility was characterized a