Richard Burman Smith

Dr. Richard Burman Smith

University of Nottingham
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2009 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CVC.A. Velis
C.A. Velis
Phil LonghurstPhil Longhurst
Phil Longhurst
GDGillian Drew
Gillian Drew
RSRichard Burman Smith
Richard Burman Smith
SPS.J.T. Pollard
S.J.T. Pollard

1 February 2006 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTM.P.M. Taha
M.P.M. Taha
GDGillian Drew
Gillian Drew
Phil LonghurstPhil Longhurst
Phil Longhurst
RSRichard Burman Smith
Richard Burman Smith
SPS.J.T Pollard
S.J.T Pollard

30 November 2010 in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CVC. A. Velis
C. A. Velis
Phil LonghurstPhil Longhurst
Phil Longhurst
GDGillian Drew
Gillian Drew
RSRichard Burman Smith
Richard Burman Smith
SPS. J. T. Pollard
S. J. T. Pollard
The move from disposal-led waste management to resource management demands an ability to map flows of the properties of waste. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of how mechanical–biological treatment (MBT) plants, and the unit processes that comprise them, perform in relation to management of material flows, while transforming inputs into output fractions. Focus is placed on the properties relating to the quality of MBT-derived fuels. Quality management initiatives for refuse-derived fuels (RDF) or solid recovered fuels (SRF) are reviewed and SRF quality from MBT plants is assessed through a statistical analysis of published data. This can provide a basis for a targeted reduction in pollution load from solid MBT outputs and subsequent end-user emissions. Our analysis, among else, (1) verifies the difficulty of chemical separation solely by mechanical means; (2) illustrates the trade-off between achieving a high quality of recoverable outputs and the quantity/properties of reject material; and (3) indicates that SRF quality could respond to legislative requirements and market needs, if specific improvements (reduction of Cl, Cu, and Pb content) are achieved. Further research could enhance the confidence in the ability of MBT plants to produce a quality-assured SRF suitable for specific end-users, without contradicting the wider requirement for an overall sustainable management of resources.

13 June 2007 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAnurag Garg
Anurag Garg
RSRichard Burman Smith
Richard Burman Smith
DHDaryl Hill
Daryl Hill
NSNigel Simms
Nigel Simms
SPSimon Pollard
Simon Pollard

1 June 2011 in Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Stuart WaglandStuart Wagland
Stuart Wagland
PKP. Kilgallon
P. Kilgallon
RCR. Coveney
R. Coveney
AGA. Garg
A. Garg
RSRichard Burman Smith
Richard Burman Smith
NSN. Simms
N. Simms

8 January 2009 in Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DTDavid John Lawrence Thomas
David John Lawrence Thomas
STSean Ferguson Tyrrel
Sean Ferguson Tyrrel
RSRichard Burman Smith
Richard Burman Smith
SFSteve Farrow
Steve Farrow
This article reviews the application of bioassays for assessing the toxicity hazard posed by landfill leachate discharged to an aquatic environment. Landfill leachate is a complex mixture of chemicals; thus it is difficult to assess the risk posed to aquatic wildlife using standard chemical identification techniques, such as gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy (GC-MS). From this review it is clear that toxicity testing, using species that represent the different trophic levels, is a superior way to predict the risk posed by discharge than chemical analysis. Previous studies assessed leachate toxicity using bacteria, algae, plants, invertebrates, fish, and genotoxicity. Studies showed that leachate exhibits a wide range of toxicities to the species tested. Ammonia, alkalinity, heavy metals, and recalcitrant organics were identified to be the cause of adverse responses from the test organisms. Concentrations of these chemicals were found to depend upon the types of waste landfilled. As part of this review, Slooff analysis was applied to published results to calculate the sensitivity of test species. It was concluded that Lemna minor and Thamnocephalus platyurus were the most sensitive tests and, Vibrio fischeri (Microtox) was the least sensitive test available. Little is known about the sensitivity of each species to the different types of waste that might have been landfilled. A battery of tests needed for a more accurate assessment of landfill leachate is proposed. Some of the more common tests have been replaced by more sensitive tests that produce more relevant results for the industry and regulators.