Gustaf Olsson

Prof. Dr. Gustaf Olsson

Lund University, Lund, Sweden (Emeritus)

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 December 2019 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Andrea G. CapodaglioAndrea G. Capodaglio
Andrea G. Capodaglio
GOGustaf Olsson
Gustaf Olsson
Urban water systems and, in particular, wastewater treatment facilities are among the major energy consumers at municipal level worldwide. Estimates indicate that on average these facilities alone may require about 1% to 3% of the total electric energy output of a country, representing a significant fraction of municipal energy bills. Specific power consumption of state-of-the-art facilities should range between 20 and 45 kWh per population-equivalent served, per year, even though older plants may have even higher demands. This figure does not include wastewater conveyance (pumping) and residues post-processing. On the other hand, wastewater and its byproducts contain energy in different forms: chemical, thermal and potential. Until very recently, the only form of energy recovery from most facilities consisted of anaerobic post-digestion of process residuals (waste sludge), by which chemical energy methane is obtained as biogas, in amounts generally sufficient to cover about half of plant requirements. Implementation of new technologies may allow more efficient strategies of energy savings and recovery from sewage treatment. Besides wastewater valorization by exploitation of its chemical and thermal energy contents, closure of the wastewater cycle by recovery of the energy content of process residuals could allow significant additional energy recovery and increased greenhouse emissions abatement.

1 April 2012 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GOGustaf Olsson
Gustaf Olsson

1 May 2019 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZYZhiguo Yuan
Zhiguo Yuan
GOGustaf Olsson
Gustaf Olsson
RCRachel Cardell-Oliver
Rachel Cardell-Oliver
KSKim van Schagen
Kim van Schagen
AMAngela Marchi
Angela Marchi
GJGuangming Jiang
Guangming Jiang

1 April 2018 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MYMin Yu
Min Yu
CWChaoran Wang
Chaoran Wang
YLYi Liu
Yi Liu
GOGustaf Olsson
Gustaf Olsson
CWChunyan Wang
Chunyan Wang

1 July 2005 in Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDalius Misiunas
Dalius Misiunas
JVJohn Vítkovský
John Vítkovský
GOGustaf Olsson
Gustaf Olsson
ASAngus Simpson
Angus Simpson
MLMartin Lambert
Martin Lambert
Sudden pipe breaks occur in water transmission pipelines and distribution mains. The consequences of these breaks can be very expensive because of the service interruption, the cost of repair, and damage to surrounding property and infrastructure. The costs associated with the pipeline breaks can be reduced by minimizing the break detection and location time. This paper presents a new continuous monitoring approach for detecting and locating breaks in pipelines. A sudden pipe break creates a negative pressure wave that travels in both directions away from the break point and is reflected at the pipeline boundaries. Using the pressure data measured at one location along the pipeline, the timing of the initial and reflected transient waves induced by the break determines the location of the break. The magnitude of the transient wave provides an estimate of the break size. The continuous monitoring technique uses a modified two-sided cumulative sum (CUSUM) algorithm to detect abrupt break-induced changes in ...

31 January 2014 in Water Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GOGustaf Olsson
Gustaf Olsson
BCB. Carlsson
B. Carlsson
Joaquim ComasJoaquim Comas
Joaquim Comas
JCJ. Copp
J. Copp
Krist V. GernaeyKrist V. Gernaey
Krist V. Gernaey
LÅL. Åmand
L. Åmand
Key developments of instrumentation, control and automation (ICA) applications in wastewater systems during the past 40 years are highlighted in this paper. From the first ICA conference in 1973 through to today there has been a tremendous increase in the understanding of the processes, instrumentation, computer systems and control theory. However, many developments have not been addressed here, such as sewer control, drinking water treatment and water distribution control. It is hoped that this review can stimulate new attempts to more effectively apply control and automation in water systems in the coming years.