Paul Henning Krogh

Dr. Paul Henning Krogh


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 April 2002 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LSLine E. Sverdrup
Line E. Sverdrup
TNTorben Nielsen
Torben Nielsen
PKPaul Henning Krogh
Paul Henning Krogh

1 March 2008 in Journal of Insect Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JOJohannes Overgaard
Johannes Overgaard
ATAleš Tomčala
Aleš Tomčala
JSJesper G. Sørensen
Jesper G. Sørensen
MHMartin Holmstrup
Martin Holmstrup
PKPaul Henning Krogh
Paul Henning Krogh
VKVladimír Košťál
Vladimír Košťál

1 August 2003 in Soil and Tillage Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPS.O Petersen
S.O Petersen
KHK Henriksen
K Henriksen
GMG.K Mortensen
G.K Mortensen
PKP.H Krogh
P.H Krogh
KBK.K Brandt
K.K Brandt
CGC Grøn
C Grøn

1 April 2000 in Chemosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAngel J Baguer
Angel J Baguer
JJJohn Jensen
John Jensen
PKPaul Henning Krogh
Paul Henning Krogh

1 January 2016 in Applied Soil Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMichiel Rutgers
Michiel Rutgers
AOAlberto Orgiazzi
Alberto Orgiazzi
CGCiro Gardi
Ciro Gardi
JRJörg Römbke
Jörg Römbke
SJStephan Jänsch
Stephan Jänsch
DZDick de Zwart
Dick de Zwart

21 June 2011 in BMC Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LHLars-Henrik Heckmann
Lars-Henrik Heckmann
PSPeter B Sørensen
Peter B Sørensen
PKPaul Henning Krogh
Paul Henning Krogh
Jesper Givskov SørensenJesper Givskov Sørensen
Jesper Givskov Sørensen
Background: Normalization of target gene expression, measured by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), is a requirement for reducing experimental bias and thereby improving data quality. The currently used normalization approach is based on using one or more reference genes. Yet, this approach extends the experimental work load and suffers from assumptions that may be difficult to meet and to validate. Results: We developed a data driven normalization algorithm (NORMA-Gene). An analysis of the performance of NORMA-Gene compared to reference gene normalization on artificially generated data-sets showed that the NORMA-Gene normalization yielded more precise results under a large range of parameters tested. Furthermore, when tested on three very different real qPCR data-sets NORMA-Gene was shown to be best at reducing variance due to experimental bias in all three data-sets compared to normalization based on the use of reference gene(s). Conclusions: Here we present the NORMA-Gene algorithm that is applicable to all biological and biomedical qPCR studies, especially those that are based on a limited number of assayed genes. The method is based on a data-driven normalization and is useful for as little as five target genes comprising the data-set. NORMA-Gene does not require the identification and validation of reference genes allowing researchers to focus their efforts on studying target genes of biological relevance.